Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

Ads on My Left Nutmeg

Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Should Connecticut Officials Audit Themselves - SB1311

by: BlastFromGlast

Mon May 14, 2007 at 09:15:26 AM EDT

(For your consideration regarding the change in how we all will vote in CT with the new optical-scan machines - what steps do we need to take to protect the vote? - promoted by Maura)

This year SB1311 is intended to increase integrity and confidence in CT's new optical scan voting machines.  It has several flaws that need to be corrected before it becomes law.  http://www.cga.ct.go...

In Sunday's Hartford Courant two members of TrueVoteCT, Michael Fisher Professor of Computer Science at Yale, and Christina Spiesel outlined its worst flaws: http://www.courant.c...

The biggest defect is that responsibility for conducting the audits and acting on the results is given to the secretary of the state - the same person who attests to the  accuracy of the machines, who controls the contracts for programming the machines, and who has a political and partisan interest in the outcome of the races to be counted by the machines.

This concentration of power in the secretary of the state creates a classic conflict of interest, where the person with the power to corrupt the process also has an incentive to do so.

The purpose of any audit is to provide an independent check. Without independence, an audit is nothing more than window dressing. The first change that is needed to the proposed legislation is to put responsibility for the audits in the hands of an independent, nonpartisan board of trustees.

We have one person responsible for selecting the equipment, certifying the equipment, contracting with an outside vendor to program elections, training election staff, and conducting the election.  With pressure to show that there were no problems with the equipment, the programming, and the conduct of the election, how can that same individual be responsible for auditing that same election and making audit decisions?

There are other significant problems with the law as now written:

BlastFromGlast :: Should Connecticut Officials Audit Themselves - SB1311
- Mandatory recounts/recanvasses such as that held in the Nov  for U.S. Representative in the 2nd CD need to be manual hand counts, not simply rerunning ballots through the machines.

- All races should be subject to random audit.  An intentional loophole in the law exempts all polling places where any race is recounted or contested from an audit.  This is undesirable for two reasons 1) If one statewide race is recounted or contested then there will be no audit in the entire election. 2) In close races that are recounted, the audit would be that much more important to insure election integrity.

- Now only a maximum of three races are audited.  All races should be audited since the most likely error is a miss programming of a single race.

- The deadline for contesting any race should be several days after the detailed audit results are made publicly available.

Should SB1311 be amended?
Yes - audits should be independent
Yes - audits and all the changes listed are needed
No - We can trust any Secretary of the State


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Logical (0.00 / 0)
Especially since the SOTS office doesn't view themselves as a repository of precinct-by-precinct (much less machine-by-machine) voting data. Even though the Sec. State claims ownership of that information, it refuses to take responsibility for the physical maintenance of the records (just like with voter reg. forms).

Mark Crispin Miller (4.00 / 1)
Look about 4 minutes into this for why he believes in 2006 Democrats should have 50 House seats and taken the Senate.  Then how the Web was used to win the Presidency in 2004. 

because Connecticut voters count: http://www.CTVotersCount.org

[ Parent ]
0 user(s) logged on.

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?


Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


My Left Nutmeg Feeds


Connecticut's War Dead

Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- Jon Kantrowitz
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
Powered by: SoapBlox