Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

Ads on My Left Nutmeg

Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Lamont in WSJ: The Democrats mean business

by: PsiFighter37

Wed Aug 16, 2006 at 07:05:46 AM EDT

( - promoted by BranfordBoy)

(cross-posted at Deny My Freedom and Daily Kos)

There are many more cars on the streets, satellite television dishes on the roofs, and literally millions more cell phones in Iraqi hands than before. All of that says the Iraqi economy is growing. And Sunni candidates are actively campaigning for seats in the National Assembly. People are working their way toward a functioning society and economy in the midst of a very brutal, inhumane, sustained terrorist war against the civilian population and the Iraqi and American military there to protect it.


I am disappointed by Democrats who are more focused on how President Bush took America into the war in Iraq almost three years ago, and by Republicans who are more worried about whether the war will bring them down in next November's elections, than they are concerned about how we continue the progress in Iraq in the months and years ahead.

Many Democrats were understandably infuriated when they read those words by Senator Joe Lieberman in a November 2005 editorial in the Wall Street Journal. The newspaper, which has an extremely good news staff but an editorial board straight from the depths of right-wing hell, has been a staunch cheerleader of just about any Republican effort due to its editorial board members. Lieberman's piece echoed Republican talking points, undermined Democrats once again (compared to a relatively tepid criticism of the GOP), and foreshadowed his eventual fall in the Connecticut Democratic primary on August 8.

So it was to my surprise when I was reading the online version of today's WSJ that there was an editorial written by Ned Lamont - something of a surprise for a newspaper that only a week ago was saying how Lamont Democrats were dangerously wrong.

PsiFighter37 :: Lamont in WSJ: The Democrats mean business
The editorial is aptly titled - it's called The Democrats Mean Business, which is a good way of framing the content of Lamont's article, which fits his positions into the context of his business experience. He describes how he started his own business, but perhaps most importantly (and maybe it's the new theme in his campaign), Lamont pulls out the following four points to explain his stances on particular issues:

First, entrepreneurs are frugal beasts, because the bottom line means everything. In Connecticut, voters are convinced that Washington has utterly lost touch with fiscal reality. We talked about irresponsible budget policies that have driven the annual federal deficit above $300 billion and the debt ceiling to $9 trillion. Meanwhile, the government is spending $250 million a day on an unprovoked war in Iraq while starving needed social investment at home. I am a fiscal conservative and our people want their government to be sparing and sensible with their tax dollars.

One of the time-honored maxims of business, even though its application at times may be questionable, is that profit should be maximized. Applied to our government, it means that we should have fiscal responsibility and should be allocating our scarce resources - income tax revenue - to the programs that people need the most. Look at the cost of war in Iraq, and one can only wonder how many uninsured people could have had health insurance, or how many kids who couldn't afford college could have gone with more federal aid to students. Lamont calls himself a 'fiscal conservative', and that's nothing to be ashamed of. The notion of a 'tax-and-spend liberal' is largely a dead one; it's only a boogeyman that the GOP raises in an effort to scare people. Bill Clinton's legacy is one of fiscal responsibility, and with the out-of-control spending policies that the GOP has instituted the last 6 years, it is the Democratic Party that are fiscally conservative - as opposed to fiscally clueless.

Second, entrepreneurs invest in human resources. Our business strives to pay good wages and provide good health benefits so that we can attract employees that give us an edge in a competitive marketplace. Well-trained and well-cared-for people are essential for every business these days, particularly in a global economy. It's getting harder and harder for American businesses to compete on price, but we innovate and change better than any economy on the planet. The quality of our work force is one of America's competitive advantages -- if our education system fails our children and our employers, we'll lose the future.

That's why I talked about my work as a volunteer teacher in the Bridgeport public schools, which can't afford to be open later than 2:30 p.m., schools that send children home to an empty house. That's why my campaign offered a strong alternative to standardized tests and No Child Left Behind. That's why I believe in an employer-based health-care system that covers everyone, and providing tax benefits to small businesses so they can provide insurance without risking bankruptcy.

Lamont does something that the Democratic Party should talk more about - the link between education and the outflow of jobs from America. Kids in middle and high school have not made gains in science, one area in particular where America has long been the leader in innovation. Nowadays, much of the exciting new progress made in science is coming from overseas. We need to have a well-educated workforce in order to compete in today's world. To do so, we need to make sure that we also have benefits for our existing workers that ensure they will remain employed. Universal health care and tax benefits to small businesses - not corporations - are important in helping the true engine of America's economy stay strong.

Third, in a market-driven economy, entrepreneurs can never lose touch with what customers, suppliers and workers are saying. A great strength of our campaign is that we embraced the grassroots and netroots, suburbs and inner cities, and used the most advanced technology to empower our door-knockers and activists. We listened hard and respectfully to what voters told us, and gave them the confidence to trust someone new.

There's been plenty of chatter about the role that the netroots played in Lamont's primary victory. While we did help Lamont get off the ground, it's important to note that the people of Connecticut - the grassroots and the ordinary citizens - played an even more important part. They were the disaffected residents who realized that Joe Lieberman no longer represented what they believed in. When you have an executive who no longer has the health of their company on the top of their list, they get fired. On August 8, that's exactly what Nutmeggers did - they fired an out-of-touch representative.

Finally, entrepreneurs are pragmatic. Unlike some politicians, we don't draw a false strength from closed minds, and we don't step on the accelerator when the car is headed off the cliff.

Much was said about how Lamont's campaign is only about Iraq. It's not, but the root cause of our continuing struggles there - blindness to reality - is something that has been evident in any action the Bush administration takes. Whether it's the inability to fund potentially life-saving stem cell research to a point where it's feasible and not just a pipe dream, or it's ignoring the awful realities that existed in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit, there's been a close-minded atmosphere in Washington, particularly with the current occupants of the White House. Iraq is devolving into civil war, and yet we're sending more troops into harm's way. This is not a winning policy in Iraq; it will only serve to drive up American casualties. Joe Lieberman has been an enabler of our failures in Iraq, but Ned Lamont supports true change in our policy. Sometimes, you need to hit the breaks.

Lamont does a good job of posing himself as a sensible businessman who felt the duty to step up and defy an entrenched senator who no longer represented his interests. Anyone who reads the editorial won't see a left-winger foaming at the mouth. Instead, they'll see a moderate who is well aware of what's wrong with the country - and what needs to be done to fix it.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

This is the frame that Lamont needs to peddle.. (0.00 / 0)
Lamont, successful and pragmatic businessman who listens to his clients, versus an entrenched senator, who is detached from reality and from his constituents concerns.

From what you excerpted, this op ed by Lamont sounds great.  He needs to keep peddling those points and he needs to show Lieberman as out-of-touch with reality.

And it will reach out to Independents n/t (0.00 / 0)

Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget your perfect offering. - L. Cohen

[ Parent ]
The Lamont Campaign... (0.00 / 0)
...is definitely going to push the businessman aspect for the general election it seems.  And they should.

--- Connecticut Local Politics

[ Parent ]
This is why I voted for Lamont (4.00 / 3)
As an executive for small, entrepreneurial high-tech firms for the last 10 years, I have seen upclose what Ned Lamont speaks of in his WSJ article.

When I first caught wind of Lamont and read his bio, it made me curious.  Once I heard more, the comparison between this unknown candidate who had meeting payroll and dealing with issues of day to day importance and the incumbent, a career politician who has never had to close a deal or choose a health plan, were made very clear.

The Ned Lamont that we know is not the candidate of Al Qa'ida.  The Ned Lamont we know is the kind of person who has the experience and the ear to the ground that our disengaged career politicians lack.

If you are on the fence between Sore Loserman and Ned Lamont and read this WSJ article and it does not sway you to the Ned Lamont side, then you are lost beyond all recovery.

entrepreneur mentality vs CEO mentality (0.00 / 0)
Good stuff, but remember W has a Harvard MBA!  The difference might live in the fact that notwithstanding  the silliness of the netboom years, entrepreneurs really have to make things work.  I'm not sure what CEOs do!

Ned went to business school, too! (0.00 / 0)
Ned went to Yale School of Management for a business degree.  I know you didn't mean to, but don't use Republican talking points about being elitist!  This just goes even further to show that both liberals and conservatives went to ivy league schools and have careers in business.  That isn't what defines your politics!

Excellent point about the difference between an entrepreneur and a CEO.  That is one of the major differences.

[ Parent ]
Link to the full piece (4.00 / 1)
Ned's article is the featured article on the WSJ's opinionjournal site:


But in the final analysis, the results of this election say less about me, and more about the people of Connecticut. They turned out in record numbers; they spoke every day with a simple eloquence and urgency about the country we love. They oppose the war and the fiscal nightmare crafted by President Bush and his allies. But their vote, finally, was one based on pragmatism and reality, on optimism and hope. And it is to these ideals and values that we plan to address my campaign in the months until November.

Thank you for posting this... (4.00 / 1)
I already pay to read NYT op-eds (Times Select), there's no way I'm going to give the WSJ $79 to read theirs!

It seems to be getting more obvious each passing day that Ned's campaign has been about issues that appeal to moderates, liberals and conservatives alike, and his win is about much more than the bloggers. He sounds like the voice of reason, which is what the Democrats need more than anything this fall.

Another big plus is Ned has taken the high road the whole way, whereas Pal Joey's behavior & words have been shamefully loaded with personal attacks and disdain for members of his own party who disagree with him. Now that Joe's fired his campaign staff, I look forward to seeing how low he'll go from this point on. My gut feeling tells me Joe will not be pulling out of the race unless the polls show him 15 pts behind. As far as Joe's strategy, Pat Buchanan predicted it's going to be the LOW ROAD all the way down on McGlaughlin this weekend.

Bravo/Barva/Fantasico/Mucho beuno (0.00 / 0)
'Nuff said.

The question is not what you are, we already determined that, we are now negotiating price.
electrealdemocrats.com Online since 3/07 -- TimetogoJoe.com Online s

Wow (0.00 / 0)
A democrat who tells you where he stands on issues and backs it up.

What epithets will Joe Lieberman use to describe this?

Joe Lieberman and George Bush believe that our govt should cut and run on capturing Osama Bin Laden so that Bush and the neocons could invade Iraq. Despite no Wmds and no links to 9/11, Lieberman supports that decision.

0 user(s) logged on.

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?


Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


My Left Nutmeg Feeds


Connecticut's War Dead

Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- Jon Kantrowitz
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
Powered by: SoapBlox