Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

Resources
2007 Legislative "Heroes and Zeroes"
2007 "Worst Republicans In The State"
2007 "Worst Democrats In The State"
CT Congressional Delegation and the Progressive Agenda
CT Clean Elections Funding Explained
Federal Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
State Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
 
 
My Left Nutmeg

NY Times Article On Lamont Blogging

by: PeterB

Fri Aug 04, 2006 at 00:54:38 AM EDT


(Comments anyone? Edited slightly for style. - promoted by BranfordBoy)

Would there have been this article if there wasn't the opportunity to publicize the blackface brouhaha?  Doubt it.

Despite that being the reason this made the paper, my sense is this is an OK article covering Lamont bloggers with a bit of lazy reporting thrown in.

First, the title:

In Connecticut Race, Bloggers Are Throwing Curves and Spitballs
Spitballs? Ah yes, we're all immature kids.  I get it.

more

PeterB :: NY Times Article On Lamont Blogging
The bloggers are mostly amplifying grievances that threatened Mr. Lieberman long before the appearance of online detractors with names like Spazeboy and Nedheads.

Glad to see they understand that Joe's problems were longstanding.

...shortly before Mr. Lieberman was scheduled to appear at a protest against Wal-Mart, a local blogger reported that the retail chain’s political action committee had sent a $1,000 campaign contribution to Mr. Lieberman. Mr. Lieberman’s campaign said he did not accept the money.
Don't take this the wrong way, but you are reporters, not stenographers, right?  Could you at least make a little attempt to get at the truth?

Lastly, the writers let Dan Gerstein, described as "a former Lieberman aide now volunteering for the campaign", paint most of the Lamont supporting bloggers as crazies who resort to crude humor and angry diatribes, but they don't require him to actually substantiate the charge.  It would have been pretty darn easy for them to check for themselves -- the archives of the blogs are there for them to look at.  Couldn't they have been bothered to check if Gerstein was lying?  
*I edited again slightly for clarity.  Thanks for doing the h-link BranfordBoy

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We would be winning (4.00 / 1)
the war in Vietnam if it wasn't for the damn hippie war protesters.

Dan Gerstein (0.00 / 0)
Why they give this bozo time is beyond me.  He was on MSNBC last night and AL Sharpton eviscerated him.  Even the always on prozac Barnacle called him on a lie when he tred to say Jane Hamsher was part of Ned staff.

Simple (0.00 / 0)
Gerstein illustrates how out of touch the Lieberman campaign is, completely underestimating the dynamics of the race, how the blogosphere played a role in promoting Ned Lamont while challenging the Lieberman campaign at every turn. If you cannot compete on that front, and have no visible prescence, of cource you will lose that battle.

[ Parent ]
It's a good article (0.00 / 0)
...not a 'hit piece' at all.

Medina covered the minor issue in decent enough detail for people to understand the pro's and cons of having unaffiliated bloggers close to your campaign. And she has full explanatory quotes from those involved.

In an interview, she said national bloggers like her acted independently of the Lamont campaign and were merely augmenting, and giving a wider audience to, what the Connecticut bloggers were already doing.

“The local bloggers are longtime political activists in the state, some of them local committee people,” Ms. Hamsher said. “They blog as a way to express what they’ve been doing for a long time, anyway. For them, it’s like a cafe. It brings them together.”

Also, note that Hillary Clinton has hired Peter Daou as a “blog adviser to facilitate and expand her relationship” with the blogging community. This is a sign that Hillary Clinton appreciates the opportunity bloggers provide to spread a message or instantly report on the issues of the day. More pragmatically it also shows she understands what can happen if you alienate that community and are openly hostile to the emerging new media. Something the Lieberman campaign may pay dearly for.


I agree (0.00 / 0)
I think the article was fair

[ Parent ]
MSM missing a point (0.00 / 0)
The "Kiss Float" is theater. Street theater, literally, of the sort that has not been seen in decades, outside of gay pride parades.

Though I did not see the "blackface" image on firedoglake, I would suspect that this was also a form of theater, considering Jane's background in film and her intelligence and wit. I cannot say if it was offensive, but I suspect it was funny.

Blogging is theater. Even the silly collage diary format of myspace sites is a type of self-portrait and characature considered art/performance/poetry in other eras.

This is the dawning of the age of internet theater. Hurrah!

(and it does not cost $50 a seat to attend)


"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


[ Parent ]
It was not funny (4.00 / 2)
It was offensive.

[ Parent ]
Believe me (4.00 / 2)
It was offensive.

[ Parent ]
ok - I totally trust Maura (0.00 / 0)
so, perhaps Jane is slipping.

I repeat that I didn't see it, though I have many friends who collect artifacts that are of their own background or others (not just racial) that I consider offensive.

I still believe this is all Theatre.

And, of course, I consider Lieberman deeply offensive as well.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


[ Parent ]
A man I met at the Jackson/Sharpton rally (0.00 / 0)
...who was African-American and was asked about the blackface image by a reporter who had a printout of it, said, "I think pictures of dead kids in Iraq are a lot more offensive."

I don't mean to diminish the recognition that the image was offensive.  It was.  But the point this man made was quite powerful, I thought, as far as putting these things in perspective are concerned.


[ Parent ]
Overall, a positive article (0.00 / 0)
I'm not crazy about the spitball headline, either, but overall the article is very fair, I think.

Jennifer Medina did what most MSM reporters on blogging rarely do - she talked about the positive impact that blogging has had.

Given the firestorm of (well deserved) indignation over Jane Hamsher's use of a really offensive image, what Jennifer Medina did is even more powerful -- she included a lengthy example of one really positive effect that Jane's blogging has had on the campaign.  It is easy to demonize Jane and do nothing but write a hit piece including examples of her  expressing anger about Lieberman (and frankly, most of us have plenty of those available for any reporter to selectively cherry-pick in order to "prove" us to be nothing but irrationally angry) but Medina did not do that - she cut through the usual MSM BS about angry bloggers to get closer to what's really going on here, the positive and the negative.  And there has been negative.  So I think overall it is quite fair.


Star gazing back and forth (0.00 / 0)
I love Jane Hamsher but for Jennie(yes I've spoken with her a few times and like her) to portray her like the mother Hen of the Ct Bloggers in this article was a disservice to her readers.Jane showed up last month not last year when the local Bloggers got this buzz going.

The preperation for trhis race was laid long before Jane had even heard of Ned Lamont and I'll say before there even was a candidate Lamont.


agreed (0.00 / 0)
Reporters are desperate to put a face to represent the blogs.  They could try to understand it is just a conversation with no one holding more weight than anyone else.  Kos, Jane Hamsher and the like certainly don't represent me. 

[ Parent ]
"When the people lead, the leaders follow." (0.00 / 0)
and ctkeith is a good example of that saying.

[ Parent ]
Jane is prettier than we are (0.00 / 0)
ya gotta admit it, keith.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."

[ Parent ]
I remember our first "contact" (0.00 / 0)
Over a year before Lamont existed you were running dumpjoe and I was running timetogojoe. There was no "candidate", just a need for people that wanted a change to look for one.

We lucked into Lamont (there was another "candidate" before him, and if he had actually run we wouldn't be where we are today). There was a movement, but no head. We got a good head, and we are lucky, or we would still be a movement stuck with 25% at the polls.

And, for the record, I believe that one of the key reasons that Lieberman didn't take Lamont seriously was because of the noise we had made for over a year. He didn't take what we were doing as serious, and he saw Lamont as part of that.

Big mistake.


The question is not what you are, we already determined that, we are now negotiating price.
electrealdemocrats.com Online since 3/07 -- TimetogoJoe.com Online s


[ Parent ]
if you give it (0.00 / 0)
you must be ready to take it

Thanks, ctkeith (0.00 / 0)
I think ctkeith had an extraordinary point, that this started long before the formal Lamont Campaign for many, many people.  Though six year terms for Senators is arguably too long (a history to that, all in itself) we have "terms" for a reason.  It is NOT an apppointment for life.  The voters assess their candidates near the end of each term, and vote accordingly.  The role is meant to change in accordance with the will of the constituents; we may vote to retain the incumbent as well.

Mr. Lamont has scored higher, for me, on ALL major issues.  One does NOT have to be “anti-Lieberman”  to vote comfortably and enthusiastically for Ned Lamont.  Lieberman has done many things necessary for him to do as a Senator.  My robo-call from Chris Dodd yesterday reminded me so.  I give Joe a “C-” with a strong caution under “Plays well with others?” category: “NEEDS IMPROVEMENT”.  The past several weeks of the Lieberman campaign have been so disorganized and negative, I could NOT vote for him now in good conscience, regardless.  Lieberman's behavior during the single public debate was embarrassing.

Humor has a long history of crossing the line into the repugnant/offensive. The “Aristocrats” comes to mind.

Clean humor?  Go to http://forevermarxis... and
scroll down to the first photo, to see our Senator’s doppleganger giving a “hug”. :)


 
11 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- DanMalloy.com
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Jonathan Harris (SD5)
- John Hartwell (SD26)
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100) - Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Di Masters (HD111)
- Michelle Mount (HD112)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox