Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Democratic Jobs Bill and Mr. Himes

by: Jon Kantrowitz

Thu Dec 17, 2009 at 10:25:38 AM EST


H.R. 2847: Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010

Nancy Pelosi:


This legislation brings jobs to Main Street by increasing credit for small businesses, rebuilding the infrastructure of America, and keeping police and fireman and teachers on the job.  

As we create jobs for Americans, we are doing so in a fiscally responsible way.  These investments are fully paid for by redirecting TARP funds from Wall Street to Main Street.

And for those hit hardest by the deep recession, this bill provides emergency relief: extending unemployment benefits, help with health benefits for those out of work, and protecting health coverage for millions through Medicaid.  

In short, this legislation creates jobs, helps meet the needs of those who are unemployed, and puts us America back on a path to prosperity.  

CT Votes:

Courtney, DeLauro, Larson, Murphy: Yes
Himes: NO

Update: Just (4:36 p.m.) got the Himes release promised much earlier this morning - it' s posted below the break.

Jon Kantrowitz :: Democratic Jobs Bill and Mr. Himes
Himes Balances Economic Relief, Fiscal Responsibility
Congressman votes against Democratic spending plan, in support of armed forces, unemployment insurance, COBRA help

WASHINGTON, DC- Congressman Jim Himes (CT-4) took a series of votes yesterday to balance the urgent needs of the jobless with the increasing need to focus on the government's fiscal health. The Congressman voted in favor of the Defense Appropriations Act, which makes critical investments in the readiness and capabilities of our armed forces, including giving our men and women in uniform a 3.4% pay raise. The bill also provides desperately needed relief to those Americans struggling with unemployment.

"Far too many Americans have lost their jobs and fear for their home and health care," said Congressman Himes. "These temporary programs will allow people basic peace-of-mind while the economy recovers and job growth returns."

The Defense Appropriations Act includes a number of provisions to help those Americans hit hardest by the recession. It extends unemployment benefits through February 28, 2010 and extends from nine to 15 months the 65% COBRA health insurance subsidy for individuals who have lost their jobs. The bill also allows the Small Business Administration to continue several enhancements to its loan guarantee programs so that small businesses can access credit more easily. The bill passed the House with overwhelming bipartisan support by a vote of 395 to 34.

The Congressman voted against a $75 billion Democratic spending plan which largely expanded programs in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. While the Congressman shares many of the priorities contained in the legislation, he was unwilling to authorize additional spending when over $545 billion, or more than two thirds, of Recovery Act funds are still being spent. This bill uses remaining funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to pay for this expansion. The Congressman believes that TARP funding, which was regrettably requested by President Bush, Treasury Secretary Paulsen, and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke as critical to averting financial meltdown, should not be used for anything other than debt reduction unless the money is distributed through the full appropriations process.

"As many sectors of the economy begin to show clear signs of recovery, we need to get our fiscal house in order," said Congressman Himes. "The simple facts are that we have to pay our bills, and the only long-term path to continued improvement is to replace public spending with private-sector job growth."

According to the Treasury, the United States will reach the legal limit on the national debt on December 31, 2009.  Legislation the Congressman helped pass yesterday will increase the limit on the debt by an amount sufficient to cover obligations through February 11, 2010.

"As it has been for decades, this vote will be demagogued. But not raising the debt ceiling would mean a stop to Social Security checks to our seniors, paychecks to our military, and interest payments on Treasury bonds," said Congressman Himes. "That would be the height of irresponsibility."

In 2001, the previous Administration inherited a projected ten-year budget surplus of $5.6 trillion. The country was posting annual surpluses and paying down the debt.  But years of deficit spending squandered those surpluses, and now the U.S. faces trillions of dollars of deficits. Increasing the debt limit is part of cleaning up the mess we inherited from the Bush Administration. Failure to increase the debt ceiling and the resulting inability of the government to meet its obligations could shake global financial markets and drive up the future cost of government borrowing or risk hurting the U.S. credit rating.  

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Jon (0.00 / 0)
O please call Himes office for a comment on this one. I can't wait to hear his response...

I Contacted His Press Secretary (0.00 / 0)
She promised a response, but I gave up waiting for it.

[ Parent ]
More info on the bill and vote (0.00 / 0)
The New York Times writes this about the bill:
"In what House members hope was their last significant vote of an eventful year, a $174 billion measure intended to create jobs was approved on a surprisingly close party-line vote of 217 to 212. The measure would redirect $75 billion from the Wall Street bailout fund to a variety of construction and employment programs, but no similar measure is expected to be considered in the Senate until next year."

Congressman Himes was one of two New England congressman to vote against the bill.  The other was New Hampshire's Paul Hodes.

Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman has been calling for far more funds for job creation, and supported President Obama's call to shift funds from the bank bailout into jobs creation.


I called his office (0.00 / 0)
... about 30 minutes ago. They definitely didn't have their talking points ready, so I'll try again in the afternoon.

my man (0.00 / 0)
What are you up to these days?

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...

[ Parent ]
This Isn't Job Creation (0.00 / 1)
Bills that continue to allow the government to feed itself do no one any good.  All this does is prolong the important business of bringing government schools, and law-enforcement into fiscally responsible sustainability.

To continue to borrow money to feed an insatiable appetite of government to recklessly spend money is not a job creation program.  This is a maliciously disingenuous way for legislators to continue to ignore their obligations to reign in spending and eliminate pointless government agencies.  This allows government to become a self-serving welfare queen that eventually will starve the country or spark an ugly revolution.

If we are looking to create jobs then we need to start rebuilding the city infrastructures to become friendly to the elderly and consumers in ways that begin to create a critical mass of elder-care services, cultural opportunity, and consumer friendly mass-transit.

There are dozens of ways to create jobs without federal hand-outs.  But that requires legislation outside the scope of our brain-dead legislators whose perpetual get-tougher act has worn thin.

- krasicki
http://region19.blogspot.com


Nobel prize winning economists disagree with you (4.00 / 4)
Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Krugman and others point out that the way to get the economy moving again is through government spending -- ideally on infrastructure. Build a new energy grid, fix our roads, create rail lines.

This puts people to work. Those workers spend their paychecks on homes, cars, appliances, etc., spurring more business growth, and more jobs. GDP grows, tax revenues grow, and the deficit goes down.

To deal with deficits specifically, they also suggest a tax on the people best able to afford it -- the wealthy. So increasing the marginal tax rate on those earning more than, say, $350,000 would be a good move. Another good move would be to reduce spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

To sum up: Spending money to create jobs is smart. But spending money on wars and refusing to make the wealthiest Americans share in the sacrifice during this crisis is what's truly reckless.  


[ Parent ]
Absolutely Capt (4.00 / 1)
 Capt is right here...Keynes  developed  this in the 30's  and it was used effectively then and should be now.Krugman and Stiglitz are modern day deciples of Keynes.

[ Parent ]
Jobs Jobs Jobs (0.00 / 0)
 Any bill that diverts money and influence away from wall street towards main street  will help us recover from this recession and is a good idea.It is an especialy good idea  toward  building an egaliterian society and away  from one in which 5% of americans control or own about 60% of the wealth.Practical Keynesian economics  stands for the principal of the government priming the pump during times like this...it  worked  for us only 70-80 years ago and could work again.

Yes and no, respectfully (0.00 / 0)
No economy can recover and grow without a healthy banking system.  I think the Geithner/Obama plan on the banks was stupid, and that they haven't been smart.  We should have nationalized the banks, taken all the equity, reinjected capital to a sufficient amount to put them back in health, written off all of the bad assets in one fell swoop, then relisted the banks on the stockmarket and kept all of the capital gains for the American taxpayers.

Now, however, we're watching the banks pay themselves a fortune in bonuses, while they simultaneously starve the economy of liquidity.  Once again, President Obama hasn't displayed the guts to take strong action against the banks, preferring instead to just ask them pretty please from the White House.  

He needs to wise up- and fast.


[ Parent ]
yes and no (0.00 / 0)
 we already have taken over alot of banks and should have nationalized the rest of them as you suggest.The White House AND Congress lack the intestinal fortitude to nationalize the Banks...and lack the intestinal fortitude  to  push for a  "public option  or a medicare buy in" and seem to run scared in the face of the Republican noise machine.I was hoping for a more agressive Executive Branch and I am disappointed.

[ Parent ]
Umm...yes and no (0.00 / 0)
Not to be facetious, but we've taken majority stakes in some banks, and taken preferred equity in others.  But instead of insisting that they write off all of their bad assets, which would have resulted in their declaring insolvency and necessitating their delisting from the stock exchange, the Obama administration pretended that they're solvent, and let the previous minority shareholders retain their stakes, while simultaneously bailing them out.  Wiping out the previous shareholders, then taking all of the equity for one penny, should have been the precondition for injecting new funds into them.  What we've done has massively benefited the old shareholders who should have lost everything, and handed them taxpayer funded windfalls.

What we should have done is what we told Asian governments to do- and they did- during their financial crises of the late '90's.  


[ Parent ]
ummmmmm partly yes and partly no.... (0.00 / 0)
 by doing it their way the Obama  White House  gave the stockholders Socialism....guaranteed bailout  while  the common person gets rugged  free enterprise.....we both essentially agree in nationalization....

[ Parent ]
Himes Press Release could well have been Written by Shays (4.00 / 1)
I would bet money he and Hodes were released by Polosi because their votes weren't needed but that just proves they're both gutless wimps not bright enough to fight the right wing noise they're scared of being beat by in 2010.



Easy, Keith. Easy (0.00 / 0)
That's over the top.

[ Parent ]
What's over the top (0.00 / 0)
I deal in reality.Himes was released from this vote and will be from any future votes that could be used to attack him from the right because he's is a very vulnerable freshman in the most conservative and wealthy district in the state.That's the way politics has been played for decades.



[ Parent ]
"Gutless wimp"? "Not bright enough"? (0.00 / 0)
Sorry.  I don't think that fits, and I don't think that's appropriate.

And I remember Chris Shays all too well.  He was the one who sent other people's kids to fight in that stupid war in Iraq while his kid remained safe and sound here.  Jim Himes opposed that war.  Jim Himes has not signed on to the stupid  war in Afghanistan, at least not yet, though the public appears to be in favor of escalation.  That is a point in Jim Himes' favor.

In 2006, Jim Himes came out early and enthusiastically in favor of Ned Lamont's candidacy, even when the party heirarchy was solidly behind LIEberman.  Jim Himes led a delegation (including me) from the Greenwich DTC to the state convention that gave Ned Lamont (including Jim Himes' vote) 19 of 22 Greenwich votes. The state overall gave Ned just 35% of the vote.  So let's keep things in perspective.

Last, we don't know if Jim Himes was "released" by Nancy Pelosi.  And let's recall that another Goldman Sachs alumnus was the former governor of New Jersey.  Are you saying that you prefer the right-wing nutjob who took over  there?

Are you saying that you want another right-wing nutjob to represent you in Congress?  That you want another slimeball like Both Ways Shays in there?

I have plenty of disagreements with Jim Himes, as I do, increasingly, with Barack Obama.  But I clearly understand that the alternative is the party of the teabaggers and Glen Beck?  Is that what you want?  No.  Then let's keep perspective.


[ Parent ]
Keith doesn't seem to be lacking for perspective (0.00 / 0)
He's not being very charitable to the Congressman in his comments, but the 40% of the district that'll never vote for Jim anyway (and will never give two shits about the chart that he'll be toting around with his National Journal ranking on it) will be even more unsparing.

Maybe you guys differ on whether Himes' bad votes are coming from flawed principles or political calculation -- I lean towards the latter, as who the hell is against extending COBRA and whatnot? -- but you both (as well as Jon) seem to be trying to find a way to convey how seriously you take this stuff directly to Jim.  

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
Keith is probably right (0.00 / 0)
 what do  you expect  from an ex  wall street type?  He is proabbly only minimumly better  then Shays.....as many of us said last year.

[ Parent ]
Don't worry, Jon (0.00 / 0)
It just speaks to the bipartisan nature of the bill.  

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...

' bipartisan nature '? (0.00 / 0)
is that what the kids are calling it these days?

.Adding Another Dimension of Vituperation Toxicity to Blogging since 1999!.

[ Parent ]
mine was a joke to (0.00 / 0)
although it wasn't a very good one

I've heard all the congressmen are bi(partisan) curious

LOL

.Adding Another Dimension of Vituperation Toxicity to Blogging since 1999!.


[ Parent ]
 
5 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Dan Malloy (CT GOV)
- Kevin Lembo (Comptroller).
- Richard Blumenthal (US SEN)
- George Jepsen (CT A.G)
- Denise Merrill (CT Sec. of State)
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100)
- Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)
- Michele Mount (HD112)

Other State Blogs
-
Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox