Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

CT Post Scooped on Whitnum Story

by: CaptCT

Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 10:20:20 AM EDT


UPDATE Both CTBob and Sue add to the scoopfest -- highlighting Lee's wacky foreign policy statements about Afghanistan -- which the CT Post seemed to just gloss over, the same way it ignores her lack of qualifications:

The Editorial Board at the CT Post had a sit-down with Lee Whitnum on Monday. Oddly, the article made no mention of Whitnum's experience or qualifications -- or lack thereof -- but just printed a bunch of Whitnum's comments (no matter how little sense some of them made). The most revealing bit of information about her candidacy came in the last paragraph:

Whitnum said she hasn't raised any money for her run against outsiders[?] and has put in about $9,500 of her own, which she hopes to eventually recoup somehow. She said she knows she is waging an uphill fight. "I'm doing the best I can with what I have," she said.

Emphasis and question mark added.

Not sure who Whitnum meant by these "outsiders" or from whom she expects to be reimbursed for campaign expenditures.

Fortunately, there's Google News, where I saw a link to Bob Gardener's diary at Weston Policy, which gives a much better look at Whitnum's candidacy:

Her qualifications seem to be that she ... hates immigrants - both legal and illegal, wrote two novels and published them herself (with sales allegedly hovering around zero), had a defense software engineering career but is now a substitute teacher in Stamford, has no discernible town, county or district political  experience, has appeared at only two Democratic Town Committees meetings in Fairfield county, had a self-publicized romance with John Kerry (before he married Teresa), and somehow got the required number of signatures on petitions to earn a line on the ballot for the Democratic primary on August 12th.

"Why you should care" below the fold...

CaptCT :: CT Post Scooped on Whitnum Story
Gardner's diary asks the obvious question:

Why should you care? Why should you vote? For starters, you're paying for it. Obviously, it will cost every town in the district to conduct an election that would have been avoided if not for Lee's successful petition in an otherwise pointless campaign. The estimate for the Weston election: about $5,000. It's not the end of the world. It's just that Lee did almost nothing to work for the nomination. She admits she has raised no campaign funds. But it is certain she will end up wasting our time and money.

I'm one of those who thinks primaries are good, but perhaps we need to raise the bar a little and make the candidates work a little harder to get on the ballot. Maybe collecting 2,500 signatures is too easy. In any case, none of these points were raised by the CT Post. Kudos to the Weston Policy blog.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Cancel elections to save money?? (0.00 / 0)
perhaps we need to raise the bar a little and make the candidates work a little harder to get on the ballot. Maybe collecting 2,500 signatures is too easy.

Have you ever tried to collect 2,500 signatures?  The whole system of petitioning as a measure of eligibility is ridiculous and arbitrarily exclusive on its face because it does not demonstrate a person's qualifications for the office, nor do most people sign because they know and like the candidate; it is merely a tedious task which tests the petitioner's endurance.  We might as well require that the candidate write sentences 2,500 times on a chalkboard, "I will be a good candidate."

Your proposal to increase the signature requirement is just as likely to deter good candidates as bad ones; it would put a damper on democracy and ensure that incumbents stay entrenched even longer than they currently do.  

I'd rather see mandatory primaries in every district (they could be combined with the presidential primaries) so that voters can weigh in, not just party insiders.  Let anyone put their name on the ballot who wants to contend, and let the voters decide.

Canada, by contrast, requires only 50-100 signatures for a candidate to run for the House of Commons.  Australia requires 50 to run for parliament.  The UK requires 10.


If a candidate has a base of support (0.00 / 0)
... built up over many years of service to the community, and has established a reputation for doing good work and making a difference,  then getting 2,500 signatures or more shouldn't be so hard.

If a person just decides one day that he or she is going to run for office because he or she is unemployed and has nothing better to do, then that person is wasting our time and money.

Right now, anyone can "run" for office, and by running I mean declaring that you're going to run for office, giving speeches, asking for signatures, and asking for donations. Anyone can do that. Lee Whitnum has proven that. My point is that maybe there should be some other qualifications to justify a spot on the ballot and the expense of a primary.

Maybe it's lowering the signature totals and requiring that the person go to every district, where they must give a speech and rattle off their qualifications. Wait, that already does happen -- at Town Committee meetings, which is just one important function these committees serve.  

It is naive to think that you can change the world by standing a million miles outside "the system" and hurling rocks or insults at it. If you want to make a difference in the world, go do something. Join a school board, serve on a town commission, join a nonprofit group, or just go out and do good work. When you are out there actually trying to make a difference in your community, and maybe even changing it for the better, you realize how HARD THAT IS -- how much work it is.

You also realize that you can't do it alone. And all the people who worked with you to make real change happen, and all the people whose lives you touched, well I'm sure they will be glad to sign your petition sheet.


[ Parent ]
Lee Whitnum wrote a check.... (0.00 / 0)
For the bulk of her signatures. She admits as much in a newspaper article I read.

Her volunteers weren't "volunteers". They got paid.

Maybe the law should be amended to say that's it is illegal to get paid for collecting signatures?

And look, I've collected signatures too. It is tough work. But someone should have to show a modicum of support before causing a primary, and of course, as we all know, Ms. Whitnum is a one-woman show.


[ Parent ]
Saramerica gives her thoughts on Lee (0.00 / 0)
in the Greenwich Times:

I planned to ignore Ms. Whitnum until I received her recent press release about Mr. Himes' trip to Israel. At that point I knew I could no longer remain silent.

Readers of this column will know that I have never supported the war in Iraq. I am about as far from a NeoCon as you could possibly find. Friends of mine will know that I've had my disagreements with AIPAC. But I know that Israel is the one true democracy in the Middle East, and is our greatest ally there.

So it incensed me to read the following drivel from Ms. Whitnum's campaign. Here's just a sample from Sara's article:

"(Israeli Prime Minister Ariel) Sharon walked into the Vatican of mosques and declared 'I am a Jew I am here to pray' for the sole purpose of inciting a riot. He did it to get himself elected prime minister. His action marked the beginning of an eight-year wave of violence. A wave of violence that resulted in our own 9-11 losses."

First of all, Sharon didn't go to into the Dome of the Rock mosque, he went to the Temple Mount, what Ms. Whitnum might call "the Vatican of Jewish temples" located nearby. Secondly, to say that this action caused 9-11 is outrageous hate speak. Being outrageous is nothing new to Lee Whitnum, who first gained notoriety when she exploited her brief relationship with U.S. Sen. John Kerry to promote her self-published book "Hedge Fund Mistress." A police officer was on hand when she accosted noted Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz at Temple Sholom in May. She has conducted a vitriolic war of words in the blogosphere, a real lesson in how not to win friends and influence people.



I swear, I'm not looking for this stuff (0.00 / 0)
but I just picked up the Fairfield Weekly and saw this:

Contenders for the 4th Congressional District's Democratic nomination, Jim Himes and Lee Whitnum, will appear on a Cablevision News 12 debate July 28 (for the Aug. 12 primary). Himes will address foreign policy and economic relief; Whitnum will focus on acting crazy.


OK It's Enough (4.00 / 1)
Now I really feel sorry for her.

[ Parent ]
I've always felt (0.00 / 0)
sorry for her.

girl's just not right in the head :(

.Adding Another Dimension of Vituperation Toxicity to Blogging since 1999!.


[ Parent ]
 
1 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox