Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Most candidates will choose clean elections

by: mikect

Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 08:00:19 AM EST


About four out of five likely candidates in the 2008 state legislative elections say they intend to participate in the Citizens' Election Program, according to a new survey conducted for the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC).  The telephone survey, implemented by the UCONN Center for Survey Research and Analysis, indicates that 86% of incumbents and 76% of unsuccessful 2006 candidates who plan to run again say they will definitely participate or are inclined to participate in Connecticut's public campaign financing program.  More than three-quarters believe that too much campaign time is spent raising money.

Some likely candidates say they might not participate (9%), definitely won't (3%), or don't know (6%).  Please speak to potential candidates in your area to ask them for a commitment to participating in the Citizens' Election Program.

Tomorrow, January 3rd, the SEEC will unveil and demonstrate a new Electronic Campaign Reporting Information System (eCRIS) for candidates, PACs and party committees.  I hope that public reports from the new system will be easier to view and interpret than the old electronic "reports," which were painfully difficult to access and interpret and impossible to export.  This event will take place at the Legislative Office Building at 11 am (event flier).  It will be broadcast on the CT Network and may later appear in their online video archive.

Additional results from the survey below.

mikect :: Most candidates will choose clean elections
Almost all current state legislators (95%) say they'll run for office again in 2008.  Less than half of candidates (39%) who were unsuccessful in 2006 will also run again.

Among those who said they would definitely not participate in the clean elections program (3%) or those who were unsure (6%), half disagreed with the idea of public campaign financing.  The Program's spending limits are not seen as a problem - very few (9%) wanted to spend more money than these limits.

Of interest to political race-trackers:

  • Three current Representatives plan to seek office in the Senate, two say they will run for a non-General Assembly office, and one is undecided.
  • One Senator is interested in seeking an office outside the General Assembly.

Of course, those who are interested in running for other offices are not identified.  One could be Senator Cappiello.  Given that the Congressional races are the only other game in town in 2008, I'm not sure what the other non-General Assembly offices would be (early municipal or statewide campaign committees?).

Resources:

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great diary Mike! (0.00 / 0)
I am going to be starting with Common Cause on Jan 10th, and part of my mission will be to raise awareness for Clean Elections Funding and recruit candidates.  I will likely be looking to all of you guys to help me spread the word!

I don't think they get it (0.00 / 0)
The Public Financing of Campaigns Law was crafted so as to make it almost silly not to participate. I have two theories as to why someone would not use the system (outside of having philosophical disagreements).
1) They don't fully understand the law, or
2) They don't expect a challenger.

On the folks who want to spend more...huh? I hope no incumbents want to spend more...and if they do, they better be doing so to boost name recognition for a higher office run. Lower, matched sending limits favor incumbents. Why would an incumbent want to give his/her opponent more money, thereby allowing them to spend a smaller percentage of their campaign budget on catching up on name recognition? It just does not make sense.


I wonder... (4.00 / 1)
how many of that 9% that want to spend more are challengers and how many are incumbents?  I bet that the majority are state rep challengers who think they need more $ to play name ID catch up...

[ Parent ]
spending more (4.00 / 1)
The 9% was a percentage of those who said they they would definitely not participate or did not know, and the answers aren't broken out by incumbent vs. challenger.  In any case, the number would be small so I don't think we can reach firm conclusions.  

I think that the handful who want to spend more don't understand the program.  If a non-participating candidate spends more than a clean elections candidate, the clean elections candidate gets additional matching money up to 100% of the clean elections spending limit.  There were only a handful of races in the state last year in which candidates spent more than 200% of the clean elections spending limit.  Someone who wanted to spend that much would lose the public relations battle badly.  And a challenger who thinks they could outraise an incumbent would have to be pretty gutsy.


[ Parent ]
let's not forget (0.00 / 0)
all the time it would take away from campaigning and the costs associated with fundraising. I couldn't imagine a sate house race (except for Amann or Cafero)raising $60k without spending at least $10k to do so and raising $200k in the senate would cost at least $20k.
As mikect said, the biggest ball-buster will be the pr nightmare a big fundriasing, "dirty" candidate will have to endure.  

[ Parent ]
CEP Still Requires Fundraising (0.00 / 0)
There are minimum requirements that must be met before a candidate qualifies - these may not be so easy for a some challengers.

qualifying contributions (0.00 / 0)
Yes, the qualifying contributions could be a challenge and are not necessarily easy to reach.  It is among the reasons that some people gave for why they would not participate or were not sure.

That might discourage some people from running, but it does NOT make sense to run and NOT participate in the clean elections program - ie, to get only private contributions.  They can always participate and raise and spend the qualifying contributions as they go.  The worse that can happen is that they don't raise enough to get the state grant.  But one can still run a respectable campaign - as many candidates now do - with less money than even the qualifying contributions.


[ Parent ]
That's good news (0.00 / 0)
It's good to see so many candidates ready to sign up for the program.  

Congrats to the people at Common Cause for working so hard to bring Clean Elections to CT, and thanks to all the legislators who got this law passed.  


 
2 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox