Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Lieberman Puts His Own Security Over National Security

by: CaptCT

Thu Aug 09, 2007 at 12:42:12 PM EDT


In today's Hartford Courant, the article "Lieberman: Alone in the Center" implies that Joe Lieberman is essentially a "man of conscience" who votes with Democrats 88% of the time but is isolated by his party because of his stance on the war. To me, this piece merely drives home one simple point: People still don't understand how Lieberman's lack of honest, intelligent leadership continues to hurt our country.

We all know that Senator Joe Lieberman is capable of saturating the media on the issues he cares most strongly about, specifically bombing Iran and "surging" in Iraq.

However, on one issue vitally important to our nation's security -- protecting America's chemical facilities from terrorist attacks -- Joe has been far less vocal; in fact, sort of docile. Why?

Based on a story in the March issue of Washington Monthly about Republican attempts to kill chemical security legislation, and Joe's silence on the issue, it appears that Joe cares more about his strong "friendships" with Republicans Dick Cheney and Senator Susan Collins than he does about national security.

CaptCT :: Lieberman Puts His Own Security Over National Security
In the summer and fall of 2006, at about the same time that Joe Lieberman and Dick Cheney were calling Democratic Senate Candidate Ned Lamont weak on terror, Republican Senators such as Collins and James Inhofe (R-Okla), with the support of the Michael Chertoff, the White House and Dick Cheney's lobbyist/bureaucrat son-in-law, were working relentlessly to defang any sort of meaningful chemical security legislation -- legislation that had the potential to protect millions of Americans from the threat of a chemical catastrophe -- and which Lieberman himself sponsored and strongly supported!

Why wouldn't Lieberman call out the dogs on Cheney, Collins, Inhofe and the Bush Administration for risking American lives? Why not send Op-Ed pieces to the Hartford Courant or Wall Street Journal slamming Republican Party leaders for playing "partisan politics" rather than protecting our national security? Why, during the heat of the 2006 midterm elections when the Republican Party was at its most vulnerable, did Joe Lieberman suddenly go soft?

One look at the source of Joe's funding for his 2006 Senate campaign provides all the answers. Joe's campaign was bought and paid for by friends of Dick Cheney and the Republican Party.   Rather than speak out on the real danger of an attack on our chemical facilities and how to prevent it, Lieberman chose to scare Americans with false threats from Iraqis fighting a civil war, all with Cheney's blessing.

The bottom line is this: When Lieberman had to choose between fighting for national security or fighting to protect his own security, Joe opted for the unprincipled, cowardly way out. And America suffers for it.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This is David Lightman propagandizing for another conservative (4.00 / 2)
This is simply another horribly slanted article from Hartford Courant's David Lightman in support of yet another Connecticut conservative.  His emphasis on the percentage of votes on which Lieberman votes with Democrats blatantly overlooks the fact that all votes are not created equal. 

It's incredible that Lightman emphasizes the percentage vote while overlooking Lieberman's shocking actions of refusing to back the Democratic candidate for president, of actually campaigning for a Republican when the Democrats' majority is (however you treat Lieberman's seat) one vote or none, of reversing himself and refusing to investigate George Bush's incompetent handling of Katrina, and of violating his own agreement with the "group of 14" to filibuster only in extraordinary situations.  Lieberman not only didn't vote with the Democrats on Iraq legislation, he participated in Republican filibusters that kept that legislation from even coming to a vote.  Of course, those actions are entirely in keeping with turncoat Lieberman who, when asked last autumn whether he preferred the Democrats or Republicans to control Congress, said it didn't matter to him.

Lightman also deceptively mentions Lieberman's no-show at the JJB dinner, but neglects to mention that Ned Lamont when introduced received a thunderous and sustained standing ovation from virtually everyone in attendance.  Of course, had Lightman honestly reported that fact, his contention that Lieberman remained a Democrat and that his future as a Democrat was iffy would be seen as complete bunk.

It is because our press corps is composed of conservative propagandists who see their job as propping up the status quo that citizens are turning to the internet in droves.

It's not just Lightman, though.  On the anniversary of Ned's primary victory does anyone remember NYT's Jennifer Medina's horribly twisted reporting in which every article started off with "Joe Lieberman is widely considered to be a centrist, while Ned Lamont is a liberal."  Do you recall her snotty comments about Ned being a liberal and the little jokes about it?

And have you seen the drivel out of Connecticut Post's Peter Urban recently?  In one article he wrote that Lieberman "was independently elected as a Democrat."  No kidding.  He actually wrote that.

What Ned's movement showed all of us was that not only is the Washington press corps useless, but that we need to clean the journalistic house back here in Connecticut, too.


excellent comment (0.00 / 0)
I recommend you transform this into a letter to the editor and send (just try to keep it under 200 words).

"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."--James Madison

[ Parent ]
Joe's made much of his "51st vote" status (0.00 / 0)
But can anyone name a SINGLE vote this year that came to a one-vote margin for a Democratic bill passing with Joe voting with the Dems? 

I sure can't.  Maybe somebody can point that out to our Majority Leader and get him to quit coddling that monomaniacal Bush spear-carrier.

Connecticut Bob


"Alone at the center"? Only a CT journalist! (0.00 / 0)
Only a Connecticut propagandist, er, I mean journalist (or was I right the first time) would still suggest that Lieberman is a centrist.  Is Lightman completely oblivious to the fact that Neocons like Lieberman occupy the far right fringe of American foreign policy opinion?  And how in the world can you term a guy who suggested supporting Bush's Social Security privatization program as a centrist?  And how could one possibly support the nomination of right wing judges as has Lieberman and still call him a centrist? 

How much credibility do journalists like this guy really have when they put out preposterous propaganda like this?  Zero.

That's why there's the internet and we are all turning to it in increasing numbers, while newspaper subscriptions continue to shrink.


It's too bad Ct doesn't have a recall option. (0.00 / 0)
I'm willing to bet that the 1/3 of the Dems who voted for Joe would like to have their vote back.

BTW (0.00 / 0)
Welcome to the front page, CaptCT!

thanks, tparty (0.00 / 0)
I'll do my best to pull my weight and measure up to the high MLN standards you and the others have set.

[ Parent ]
"High Standards" and "MLN" (4.00 / 1)
those are two terms you rarely see in the same sentence. ;)

Thanks, though. You're already exceeding them!


[ Parent ]
I noticed that too! (0.00 / 0)
Hello! Hello! I was actually thinking of CaptCT as one of the MLN'ers who could easily share the mantle of front-pagerhood. There are others--but I wouldn't name names since I don't work by pressuring people into something they may not want to do.

But, I'm glad you rose up to the challenge CaptCT. I think you'll do just fine.

Still, why is ctblogger no longer on the roll call of frontpagers?

The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice. --Martin Luther King, Jr.


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox