Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Lieberman Endorses Collins

by: Matt Browner Hamlin

Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:50:51 AM EDT


Joe Lieberman has told CongressDaily (subscription required) that he will support Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine in her 2008 reelection campaign. Collins had endorsed Lieberman last year when he was running for reelection. Moreover, Lieberman affirmed his previous statements that he might endorse a Republican for president and would not rule out a switch to the GOP.

"I'm going to support Sen. Collins' re-election," he said in an interview with CongressDaily reporters. Lieberman, who was re-elected last year as an independent but continues to caucus with Democrats, added that his leadership PAC has already made the maximum contribution of $5,000 to Collins' campaign.

"This is without regard to who the Democratic nominee would be," he said. "I would just feel that I was not being honest to myself and everything I've said about what our politics should be like now if, for partisan reasons, I didn't support somebody who I think is a great senator."
...
Lieberman also reserved the option of endorsing a Republican for president in 2008 and repeated statements that he has not ruled out a future -- albeit unlikely -- switch to the Republican Party.

During the wide-ranging interview, Lieberman said he had not discussed his decision with Senate Majority Leader Reid. His staff did inform Reid's office of the plan Thursday; a spokesman for Reid declined to comment.

Lieberman acknowledged his support for Collins could shape the balance of power in the Senate, which Democrats control by a single vote. But he said his decision was ultimately driven by "the wonderful productive working relationship" the two have and the fact that she campaigned for his re-election last year. [Emphasis added]

There is no question that Lieberman shares no allegiance to the Democratic Party. I don't begrudge him that--he's no longer a Democrat because he failed to live up to the expectations of Connecticut's Democrats. We all know how angry he's been the last year, so this shouldn't strike us as a surprise.

But yet again the political miscalculations by Bill Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and Harry Reid about the possible fallout of Lieberman winning the general election on his own ticket are coming back to burn the Democratic Party. Clearly Lieberman pulled the wool over the eyes of big name Democratic leaders -- people who may have been able to force him out of the race by publicly condemning his decision to ignore the will of CT's voters -- and now Joe is operating with no regard to the Democratic Party's needs.  Lieberman has done everything but join the GOP in name. He is an independent-in-name-only (IINO). He endorsed someone outside of his caucus without consideration of who the Democratic challenger would be and he's giving money to her reelection campaign--$5000, the exact same amount Ned Lamont received from Hillary Clinton and a handful of other Democratic senators.

Worse still, Lieberman understands the importance of Collins seat for the control of the Senate. He knows that her reelection will limit the Democrats' progress towards a filibuster-proof majority. He's making decisions that could dramatically affect the future chances for a Democratic president to pass Democratic legislation while cutting Harry Reid out of the loop of his decision. How exactly is Lieberman caucusing with the Democrats? What do Democrats gain by having him as a member of their caucus? Someone tell me, I do not know.

Matt Browner Hamlin :: Lieberman Endorses Collins
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Lieberman Endorses Collins (0.00 / 0)
No surprise here.  Those two have been "tight" for some time.  Frankly, if the Democrats can win a few more seats in 2008 -- which should be a cakewalk unless (a) they fail to stand firm against the president and (b) Karl Rove remains in charge of voting fraud -- it would be a blessing if Lieberman jumped to the Republicans. 

Lieberman Endorses Collins (0.00 / 0)
No surprise here.  Those two have been "tight" for some time.  Frankly, if the Democrats can win a few more seats in 2008 -- which should be a cakewalk unless (a) they fail to stand firm against the president and (b) Karl Rove remains in charge of voting fraud -- it would be a blessing if Lieberman jumped to the Republicans. 

Americans United for Change (0.00 / 0)
They've put out this ad (left) against Collins. It's been effective, so much so Collins has had to reply in an ad of her own (right). Hint: it's never a good idea to repeat verbatim an opponent's attack.

My take.



Is she really paying for... (4.00 / 1)
a 90 second ad that's that bad?

Jesus, media in Maine must be cheap.

Seriously, no voiceover whatsoever? I specifically clicked to watch it and almost fell asleep in the middle. I wonder how it'd go over to a TV-watching audience.

The only good thing about the original ad is the explosion at the start (catches your attention), and it's the only .5 second clip they removed in the process of re-airing the ad. It's incredible that her media team could make the most generic attack ad ever actually look clever by comparison.

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
I love that when this ad is talking about "lies" (0.00 / 0)
it's dominated by the color red (Republican) and the last few seconds when the word TRUTH is on the screen the color blue (Democratic) dominates.


[ Parent ]
Please note the hypocrisies in that add (4.00 / 1)
by Collins:

"In this 2004 picture,
President bush is signing
The Intelligence Reform &
Terrorism Prevention Act

(cut screen)

Susan wrote this law.
This photo has nothing to do with Iraq."

Now, in 2007, That photo-op for the the signing of that law has nothing to do with Iraq because Iraq has nothing to do with Terrorism according to the right-wingnuts.

I wonder what Collins was saying in 2004?

"We are so proud that the President signed into law today the Collins-Lieberman Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. It took a lot of hard work to get to this day and to deliver real and comprehensive reform legislation to the American people," said Senators Collins and Lieberman in a joint statement. "We are pleased that we were able to work together with the President and our colleagues to enact the monumental reform that our intelligence community needs to deal with global terrorism. This law will help to make our country safer and will improve the intelligence provided to our troops."

I guess those republican Collins supporters still haven't figured out that alot of our troops are in Iraq?

Even back then they were tying this bill to "supporting the troops in the GWOT"...

Well? If it wasn't really to support the troops in Iraq (and elsehwere) like they were saying when they were pushing this bill, then what was this bill really for?

Perhaps Lieberman would like to explain his parrallel hypocrisies here as well?


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
Also: (0.00 / 0)
Just how many of those MoveOn.org supporters are from Maine? And how many of those "Democratic groups" have members that are in Maine?

Somehow I think they may just be lying a little when they say the add was funded by "100% out-of-state money"...



Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
Good catch (0.00 / 0)
You should forward your comments to the DSCC.

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...

[ Parent ]
You have better contacts than I do! (0.00 / 0)
At least, in the Democratic party... lol I am just a "little i no party affiliation indie". heh :)


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
Lieberman is trying to delay being sent into political oblivion (0.00 / 0)
Collins campaigned for Lieberman during the general election last year, so I'm not surprised by this, but I look forward to seeing Lieberworm's face when Democrats win more seats and Lieberman becomes irrelevant.  That look will be priceless.

Good point. (0.00 / 0)
The Lieberman/McCain/Collins club is failing.  Part of this, especially the 'without regard' BS, might be an olive branch to Collins as his rush to the right of her isn't doing it for him.

I reblogged this to turnmaineblue.com, where they are steaming over Collins.  And the biggest 'tell' as far as they are concerned, in terms of how foolish she is, is her rock-ribbed support of McCain for president in the state of Maine.


[ Parent ]
About Collins (4.00 / 2)
More about Collins and the Democrat likely to oppose her.

Allen as a serious threat (0.00 / 0)
Although Collins has nearly as high approval ratings in Maine as Olympia Snowe she's not as well regarded, nor can she raise the money Snowe can with her longer Senate tenure. Case in point, at the end of last year Collins had less money than Allen, who raised over a million in a small state. Collins had only about $400,000 on hand as of 12/31/06.

http://herndon1.sdrd...

It'll be interesting to watch how she tries to keep the conservatives happy by remaining close enough to BushCorp while not offending Democrats and Independents. We're seeing minor slippage there, while she enjoys an 84% Rep/79% Con ratings (last Nov).

http://www.surveyusa...

This is a real pickup opportunity.


[ Parent ]
Track Record? (0.00 / 0)
Lieberman supports Bush/Cheney.

Lieberman supports Rummy.

Lieberman supports Rowland.

Lieberman supports Nancy Johnson.

Lieberman supports Imus.



With 21 Republican Senators up for re-election, (0.00 / 0)
we shall have to make sure that a Collins loss is another slap in the face of Lieberman!  That he loses one of his little playmates in DC. 

This election for Senate in 19 months is SO important.  Not only to cement more of a majority, but to make Lieberman totally ineffective.  I want to see him brushed to the side by both parties, as the Nothing that he really is.  His grasp on the short hairs of both parties must be cut off. 


Joe hearts Susan... (0.00 / 0)
and it won't be long before he's in Harry Reid's face with his new Collin's campaign button that states:  "She's hot, you're not!"

No suprises here!!!!!!!!!!


Will Lieberman be kissing Collins in that button? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
 
2 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox