Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

Resources
2007 Legislative "Heroes and Zeroes"
2007 "Worst Republicans In The State"
2007 "Worst Democrats In The State"
CT Congressional Delegation and the Progressive Agenda
CT Clean Elections Funding Explained
Federal Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
State Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
 
 
My Left Nutmeg

National Guard Readiness - A Guest Post from Senator Chris Dodd

by: Senator Chris Dodd

Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 12:25:51 PM EST


(Welcome Senator Dodd! I hope this will be the first diary of many. - promoted by Matt Browner Hamlin)

  First, I’d like to thank the people of My Left Nutmeg for this opportunity to write to all of you.
 
  I wanted to take a moment to tell you about some legislation I introduced this week in the Senate. Last Thursday, the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves released a report revealing that 88 percent of Army National Guard units are not adequately equipped for combat and unprepared for domestic emergencies. According to them, the National Guard is lacking the trucks, Humvees, generators, radios, night-vision goggles and other gear that is critical for responding to a major disaster, terrorist attack or other major crisis.  I was outraged by these findings, and subsequently introduced a bill to allocate $38 billion to the National Guard over the next five years to address this serious problem.

  According to the report, our National Guard faces significant equipment shortages because of – you guessed it -- their heavy deployment in the ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Under orders by the Administration, National Guard troops have been forced to leave their state’s equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan for other troops rotating into combat zones.  Many of their military vehicles and aircraft are being worn down and destroyed in battle.  Any critical gear that may have survived is being transferred to other units coming into Iraq or Afghanistan. You can click here if you would like to read the report yourself.

  First of all, this highlights the perpetual issue of our troops being deployed without being adequately prepared and protected for combat. Second, when National Guard troops do come home, they are finding their stock of equipment cleaned out. So we are faced with a frightening series of questions—what will happen when the next natural disaster like Hurricane Katrina strikes?  Who will help restore order?  Who will provide critical emergency response services?  And what equipment will they use?

  I’ve always felt that it is our duty to ensure that our troops have the equipment and support they need to successfully carry out their missions.  Unfortunately, this is not the first time that Congress has had to intervene to support our troops when the Bush Administration came up short.  In fact, since the very beginning of the war in Iraq, I have fought to provide critical equipment for our troops over the White House’s objections.  In 2003, I offered legislation to address a $322 million shortfall in critical military equipment identified by the Army.  But the Administration opposed my amendment and it failed along party lines. Click here to see the vote.

  In 2004 and 2005, my amendments were finally enacted, requiring the Department of Defense (DoD) to reimburse military personnel for critical gear purchases they made for their combat missions when the Rumsfeld Pentagon failed to provide necessary equipment. And last year, I authored legislation to restock our Army’s fleets of tanks, trucks, and aircraft.   The Army recently reported that two-thirds of its forces in the U.S. are not ready for duty – no doubt due in part to its war-battered equipment. (For a timeline detailing my struggle to equip the troops, please visit my site here)

  More attention must be paid to our National Guard’s equipment needs.  We rely on our citizen soldiers to perform important missions here at home and abroad. From providing critical support during national disasters like the tornadoes that swept through the South, to fighting on the battlefields of Iraq, these brave men and women work tirelessly for our nation. The very least we owe them is the necessary funding and equipment to complete their mission as safely and effectively as possible.

  I hope you will join me in supporting this legislation and I look forward to reading your thoughts and comments. Members of my staff will also address any questions and concerns you might have. Thanks again to the people of My Left Nutmeg for allowing me reach out to their readers and my constituents.
Senator Chris Dodd :: National Guard Readiness - A Guest Post from Senator Chris Dodd
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thank You (0.00 / 0)
Thank you for joining our community here today Senator Dodd. I hope that this is just the first of many visits to the site.

http://holdfastblog.com

Thanks for participating! (4.00 / 1)
Hi everybody. I am Senator Dodd's Media Technology Director. I will be working with you to get any of your questions or concerns answered. I ask that you please keep the comments limited to this topic. Also due to Senate ethics and FEC rules, I will not be able to comment on the presidential campaign. Thanks for participating!

Adam (0.00 / 0)
Might I suggest that Sen. Dodd announce quickly that he will NOT participate in the Nevada Presidential Debate that will be sponsored by Fox News.

  Decisions on things like this should be easy and done quickly.


[ Parent ]
Even if (4.00 / 2)
Even if he can't comment as to the presidential race, Keith's right that it would garner a lot of quality netroots attention. And how many debates does one need to attend in Nevada, anyway?

The unknown variable is how much Reid is whipping sitting Senators to stay in the Fox News debate. Would the ramifications of such a move include diminished prospects for the Habeas bill, for example?

–7.25 / –7.28

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
Unlike Obama and Edwards (0.00 / 0)
..Chris Dodd has appeared on Fox News with some regularity, both in studio and on the campaign trail.

I don't see it happening.


[ Parent ]
Hey, every Democrat, including Senator Dodd, (0.00 / 0)
needs to start pushing for media balance. Their side has Hannity, O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Joe Scarborough, etc, etc, etc. All we get is Olbermann?

I'm so sick of watching panels consisting of three Republicans and one paid Democratic hack.... And we wonder how Kerry lost to Bush??


[ Parent ]
Readiness and Deployment (0.00 / 0)
It's clear that the National Guard - and to a lesser extent the Reserves - have been shortchanged by the Bush administration. I support Senator Dodd's efforts to get them the gear that they need, but does he have any plans to tie this legislation to troop deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan? Does he support Rep. Murtha's proposal to place readiment requirements on troop deployments?

http://holdfastblog.com

Thank you Senator Dodd for taking the time to participate at MLN (0.00 / 0)
Since many in Congress state that they "support the troops," what are the main objections towards this proposal from your critics?


From Senator Dodd: (0.00 / 0)
"I have been asking that very same question for four years now.  When I initially proposed legislation to add $322 million to the budget in 2003 to address equipment shortfalls identified by the Army, the Administration's allies actually rejected the Army's own statements, and said that the shortfalls didn't exist. In my view, there appeared to be a shocking level of incompetence or neglect.  I'm sure you remember Secretary Rumsfeld's comments that "you have to go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want." That kind of notion was unacceptable then, and it certainly is unacceptable now.  Our troops need our support now more than ever.  And I believe it is essential that when they are sent into battle they are given the tools required to operate safely and effectively."

[ Parent ]
Dragonskin Armor v. Interceptor (4.00 / 1)
Senator - can you explain why the US Secret Service, the CIA and 9 Generals in Iraq use Dragonskin armor, but our troops are stuck with the inferior Interceptor armor?

http://en.wikipedia....

Would you kindly look into whose constituency is served by the Interceptor contract? And why that constituency should benefit to the detriment of our troop?

I hope this is on-point enough - I'm assuming that this is a discussion of how the administration has failed our troops, contrasted with how you wish to show your commitment to the troops...

Thanks you.


From Senator Dodd: (0.00 / 0)
"This issue has been brought to the attention of several members of Congress over the years.  Officially, the Army says that only personal body armor that meets their current specifications satisfies current operational requirements.  Soldiers should be outfitted with the most protective armor possible that allows them to move with appropriate agility."

[ Parent ]
Dragon Skin (0.00 / 0)
For a time, at least, soldiers were told that using Dragon Skin armor would prevent their widows or next of kin from receiving military-issued benefits should they die in the field.

Independent studies (as well as studies by the Air Force) have shown Dragon Skin armor to beat the current Army system in both anti-ballistics and flexibility tests.

Hopefully the Dem-controlled Senate will break the logjam of military suppliers/donors that occurred under Republican leadership, which has had the effect of decreasing survival rates of soldiers in the field. That's a challenging issue here in Connecticut, with so many defense manufacturers, but it's important to decouple in-district domestic concerns from decisions about military requirements.

The body-armor issue has become iconic for many across the political spectrum who are concerned about our government - the legislative and executive branches - wasting money on inferior equipment for political reasons. This tendency costs us dearly, both in lives and in domestic programs, and I hope the Dodd bill can make higher standards the norm.

–7.25 / –7.28

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
Chris Dodd on "Road to the White House" (0.00 / 0)

From C-Span and upped by CJDTV (aka Tim), an official staff member. 24 min in length.

Senator Dodd's YouTube channel is located here, if anyone was looking for it.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=SenatorDodd

We now return you your regularly scheduled programming...


Thank you, Senator Dodd (0.00 / 0)
For coming to MLN. Thanks for representing me in the US Senate. I would have preferred two people, as the Constitution told me I'm entitled to. But, I guess, one is better than none.

The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice. --Martin Luther King, Jr.

Traditional role of Guard... (0.00 / 0)
The traditional role of the National Guard has been for domestic purposes such as disasters, etc. and to supplement the military (but not replace the regular military). The Bush administration has to some extent redefined this role to put the National Guard on the front lines in Iraq which some believe was never the original intent of Congress. How do we get back on track on this?

BlueSunbelt.Com Netroots for the Sunbelt states robwire.com My personal blog

From Senator Dodd: (0.00 / 0)
"The National Guard has performed their missions with great skill both overseas and at home.  Unfortunately, as you said, both our Guard and reserves have been called on at unprecedented levels.  They have stopped being in effect "reserve forces," with such frequent call-ups causing disruptions both for their families and their employers.  We need to continue to find ways to relieve the personnel strains caused by current defense policies and expand the active Army force dramatically as advised by former Army Chief of Staff and current president of the Association of the United States Army, General Gordon Sullivan.  The President and new Secretary of Defense have indicated that they are pursuing this new strategy after initially opposing expanding our forces.  Some of us in Congress have been calling on this change for some time. [http://dodd.senate.g...] In addition, I continue to support tax and other incentives to those patriotic employers who hire Guard and reserve members."

[ Parent ]
Great Questions So Far (0.00 / 0)
Just wanted to let you know I have forwarded your comments to the appropriate staff, and will continue to do so. I will post answers as I receive them. Thanks!

$38 billion now, what later? (4.00 / 2)
Senator Dodd: The $38 billion in funding for the National Guard is a good first step, but if the money is used for the Iraq War, we'll need another $38 billion very soon.

These "weekend warriors" didn't join the National Guard to spend months in the desert as targets for snipers. They are meant to Guard the Nation in the event of emergencies. The most important thing you, and Congress, can do is to bring them home, stop funding the war, or at least cut off funding for any additional troops.

We elected Democrats in the 2006 election to end this war and to end the corruptive influence of lobbyists. So far neither has happened (see link). What do you plan to do to end the war, and to work toward real lobbyist reform?


Easy solution: Defund War, Fully fund National Guard (4.00 / 1)
President Bush is going to ask you for tens of billions of dollars for war. Why not cut out some wartime Halliburton profiteering and use that for the National Guard?

Adequately funding the Guard, Walter Reed, and the VA, will actually support the troops as they deploy and return from Iraq. But what we need now, as a previous commenter has also noted, is to save the troops from being forced to referee a civil war.

I admire your courage in taking one of the most aggressive positions on Iraq. I hope you stay in the race and force the others to realize that they need to emulate you.

[Thanks for posting here, Senator Dodd, etc, etc.]


Thank you (4.00 / 1)
Senator Dodd, thanks for reaching out to us in the MLN community and for your continued leadership, especially in the area of restoring habeus corpus.

I applaud your efforts to make sure that National Guard units are properly equipped. 

I hope you will also stress concerns shared here that the misuse of the National Guard in long-term deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan is threatening our security here at home.


Who does the forecasting? Who is ignoring it? (0.00 / 0)
Thank you Senator Dodd, for making yourself and your staff available.  This feels much more civilized and less happenstance than trying to call in on radio show!

I remember the Q&A where the young man asked Rumsfeld about armor for his Humvee.  I remember reading that we were going to use Israeli bullets on Muslims because we ran out of ammo.  I believe I've heard that the Walter Reed situation was made worse by bad forecasting for such a long engagement. 

Who does the forecasting for suppilies and equipment during this kind of conflict?  Is there a separate govt agency that audits these numbers before you get to see them?  Did you have to conduct a separate study in order how to arrive at your numbers?  What can you propose to keep this from happening again?

It is distubing that is legal to send our troops into a theater unprepared.  I'm very glad you are looking out for them.


Separate domestic resupply from overseas needs (0.00 / 0)
Senator Dodd, the only question I have about this legislation at the moment is that, given the National Guard has been inappropriately deployed for a war in the Middle East, how do you propose to keep the new equipment from ending up in the Middle East as the old equipment that is being destroyed did?

I am not in favor of calling the equipment "national guard" equipment and then having it appropriated for a war.  I support having proper supplies and equipment for domestic use, of course. 

Is there a way that you can prevent use of the funds or the equipment for  more of same?

And, a practical question:  if the government sends in a purchase order today, what is the lead time until equipment ordered could be in our states for use in natural disasters?

I suspect your answer in many cases will be in the years, not months variety.

Next piece of legislation:  how does the US government propose to prepare itself for the next few  natural disasters?  Clearly funding replacement supplies and equipment may not take care of those situations.

Thanks for coming by.


Biggest Hawk in Charge of These Funds? (0.00 / 0)
By the way, when funding is appropriated for the National Guard's equipment and supplies for domestic emergencies, does that  come under armed services funding or homeland security or what? 

I have the impression that it's not a minor point, since one of the biggest hawks and war supporters in our Congress is heading the Senate's Homeland Security Committee, and I have read general statements saying that appropriations have been misdirected from other intended purposes to fund this war to date.

It's a valuable proposal AND Congress has a credibility problem right now.


 
10 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- DanMalloy.com
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Jonathan Harris (SD5)
- John Hartwell (SD26)
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100) - Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Di Masters (HD111)
- Michelle Mount (HD112)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox