Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Ned Lamont: Diehard Democrat or GOP Patsy?

by: mikect

Wed Jul 26, 2006 at 08:00:57 AM EDT


(This is great! - promoted by spazeboy)

By now, you've been bombarded dozens of times with Joe Lieberman's message that Ned Lamont is a faux Democrat because he purportedly agreed with Republicans on the Greenwich Board of Selectmen 80% of the time.  "Poppycock!" said Ned.  Those were "pothole" votes.  But was he really a principled progressive or a paleoconservative patsy?

How does his record compare to other Democratic selectmen in minority seats?  And what the heck do those people vote on, anyway?  I was determined to crack this case wide open.

mikect :: Ned Lamont: Diehard Democrat or GOP Patsy?
Ned's voting record from his political heyday of 1987-89 is likely buried under dust bunnies in the town hall basement.  But fortunately, Greenwich posts many, though not all, of its more recent minutes of the Board of Selectmen meetings online. So I reviewed the available minutes for the last two years.

Has the lone Democrat currently on the three-member Board taken a more independent stance than Ned?  The bottom line: among 84 Board decisions, Democratic Selectman Penny Monahan sided with the Republican majority at least 99% of the time!  (It may well have been 100%, but the minutes did not indicate who parted ways on the only non-unanimous vote concerning a "no turn on red restriction.")  Ned's mere 80% concordance would seem to place him on the liberal end of the Greenwich political spectrum, just as his Republican colleagues have insisted.

These are just some of the hot-button issues on which Selectman Monahan tragically caved to the vast right-wing conspiracy:

  • Proposal to establish an off-leash dog park
  • Request to hang promotional banner for the Scarecrow Festival
  • Charles Street – request for handicapped parking space
  • Replacement of the Loughlin Park restroom

Capitulation on public park porta-potties?  Is this the best that local Connecticut partisans can hope for?  Have we witnessed the end of municipal ideology and the ascendancy of Kumbaya town hall bipartisanship?

To find out, I looked across the state to Simsbury, where Republicans also outnumber Democrats on the Board of Selectmen.  Reviewing their minutes for this year, I found that the Democrats unanimously agreed with their colleagues on at least 97% of the 118 Board motions.  There were only three motions resulting in dissenting votes, and the minutes did not record the names of the malcontents.  (Perhaps it's considered impolite to dwell on such differences.)

But both Greenwich and Simsbury are well-to-do communities with ample resources.  Are these comfy suburbs peculiar outliers, happy havens for hand-holding honchos?

For an answer, I turned to a less tony town with a Democratic minority — Groton, where the median family income falls substantially below the state average.  On Groton's nine-member Council, the three Democrats voted unanimously with the Republicans 94% of the time on the 49 Council motions this year.  None of the dissenting votes were along strictly party lines.

But surely such amicable unanimity is confined to leafy suburbs and small- to mid-sized towns primarily concerned with mundane administrative minutiae.  The many controversial and complex issues faced by a larger city with an ethnically diverse population must inevitably spark conflicts that are ultimately reflected in more partisan vote tallies.

Certainly, Danbury's 21-member Common Council must represent a diversity of opinions and personalities.  Councilor Lynn Taborsak is a noted feminist and progressive who had a 100% voting record with the CT Citizen Action Group as a state representative.  Yet among 164 Common Council motions this year, all seven Democrats voted unanimously with the Republican majority 90% of the time.

Having combed every corner of the state in search of examples of bitter, partisan, town hall discord, I came up short.  By Connecticut standards, it seems that Ned's purported 80% agreement with his Republican colleagues would rank him as a  bold Democratic maverick.  Case closed.

Methodological notes for picky people:

  • Greenwich: Counted references to "approved," "unanimous," and "the Board agreed" as unamimous agreement.  Excluded procedural actions, such as acceptance of minutes, motions to go into executive session, or deferral of action.  Summarized available minutes from July 2004 to June 2006.
    Summarized 2006 motions from towns below, excluding motions to adjourn, enter executive session, or accept minutes.  Ignored abstentions.
  • Simsbury: January through June 2006
  • Groton: January through June 2006
  • Danbury: January to July 2006

To witness Joe Lieberman's obsessive use of the 80% statistic, see his flip-flop TV attack ad, his his distortion attack ad, the elephant mailer, and the 80% mailer, among others.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Wow. (0.00 / 0)
Great work!

I knew that voting on local issues is generally not partisan, but i had no idea how not-partisan these local issues are.

Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget your perfect offering. - L. Cohen


Great work but.. (0.00 / 0)
I don't think it will change any minds. Those of us with brains know it was all BS. For the rest, they will keep repeating the mantra, "Ned voted with the Republicans in 1989..." much like the "We are in Iraq to get revenge for 9/11" myth.

Ct for Joe (0.00 / 0)
Shows how little Joe knows about CT.

Another shocker... (0.00 / 0)
Democratic board, commission and committee members vote for Republicans to fill vacancies and Republican board, commission and committee members vote for Democrats to fill vacancies.

Board, commission and committee vacancies are even filled with people who are registered as Unaffiliated!

Unlike boards and committees, we now know via Senator Liberman that pot-holes are very particular about what they are filled with, and who does the filling.


This is an excellent diary entry! (0.00 / 0)
Well researched, lots of excellent facts, plenty of helpful links. Easily one of the best I've seen on the front page.

Social libertarian.

Nice work, Mike! (0.00 / 0)
Some enterprising reporter ought to go dig those reports up at the Greenwich town hall.

Greenwich Town Hall (0.00 / 0)
My favorite thing about "Ned Voted With Republicans" is that it was as a city councilman. As far as I know - there's a fair amount of Republicans in Greenwich and it's likely that there's a fair amount on the town council.

Town Councils are not partisan circuses, they're committees of citizens who come together to address the issues of their community. They do it not for power, but to find practical solutions that helps everyone in their town. I'm sure that the Republicans on the Greenwich City Council were not involved in starting wars for oil or curtailing civil liberties. They were working on potholes and education funding. Ned's "voting with Republicans in Greenwich line" is not damning - it's a sign of civic engagement.

Looking up at my post. . . I think everyone probably assumes I'm a city councilman. Haha.


[ Parent ]
Repubs make up 40% of Greenwich Voters (0.00 / 0)
The breakdown is 20% Democrats, 40% independents, and 40% Republicans.  But as of last October, the number of Republican voters in town had declined by 11% since George Bush took office, while the number of Democrats and independents rose.  Although most town Republicans are relatively moderate (John McCain won the 2000 Republican primary in Greenwich, even though it was home to three generations of the Bush family), there are some exceptions among its elected officials.  Dolly Powers, the state representative from the 151st district in Cos Cob, a part of Greenwich, possesses one of the very worst environmental voting records in the entire state house of representatives.  As measured by the CT League of Conservation Voters, she is often rated dead last among the 150 representatives.

This year she is being challenged by Ed Krumeich, a member of the Board of Estimates and Taxation (BET), the same position that Ned Lamont held for six years.  A successful lawyer in town, DTC and BET member, he could just be the guy to win the Democrats their first seat in the state house of representatives from Greenwich since 1917.

And by the way, that is why Ned's political career didn't develop.  There was just no way that a Democrat at that time was going to get elected to first selectman or higher.  In fact, he lost a race to state senator Bill Nickerson, who is still there.

But I think that Greenwich voters are beginning to see the light.  I'll bet you that a large number will come out for Ned, both Republican and independent, in November.  We Greenwich Democrats are proud as hell of Ned.  And I think our enthusiasm will prove contageous!


[ Parent ]
impressive diary (0.00 / 0)
Great work, mikect! The best investigative journalists in CT write here on My Left Nutmeg.

This is why I mostly rely on the CT blogs to get the real scoop on CT politics. Most mainstream media reporters cannot tough do tough investigative work because they need to be able to rub shoulders with powerful politicians to be able to use them as direct sources for their articles. Politicians wouldn't be as willing to serve as sources for reporters they felt were too critical of them.

Ted Koppel once said, "People shouldn't expect the mass media to do investigative stories. That job belongs to the 'fringe' media.”

He was right...although blogs are becoming less and less "fringe" every day. :)

"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."--James Madison


Poppycock !! (0.00 / 0)
Joementum's attack on Lamont for what anyone can see is pothole and dogleash issues is just...POPPYCOCK..

 


Excellent work (0.00 / 0)
Have you considered forwarding this to members of the local press?  Or, perhaps, turning it into an op ed?  This is really core to the Lieberman camp's central charge against Lamont, and you have really hit it out of the park.  It would be great to seet this in print.

I have one question (0.00 / 0)
And I hope it is legitimate.  Where did Joe and Ned fall on the issue of easing FCC restrictions?  I don't think it really matters, but if Ned sided against the republicans, I think that would more than disrepute Lieberman's absurd claim.  I believe that Joe was on the wrong side of that issue too.

Penny Monahan is in bed with Repubs in Greenwich (4.00 / 1)
Selectman Penny Monahan has been severely criticized by Greenwich Democrats for siding with Republicans on those issues in which there is serious disagreement.  And aside from votes, she has worked with the two Republicans on the board of selectmen to kick out registered Democrats from volunteer positions on town agencies, positions that serve as launching pads for elective office in Greenwich.  As a result, Ms. Monahan last year came within one vote of losing the party's endorsement for another term as Greenwich selectman, and she failed to be selected as one of the 22 delegates to the state Democratic convention in May.

If Penny were to run for statewide office, it is an absolute certainty that Greenwich Democrats would scream about what a turncoat she is.  But we remember Ned Lamont, and there is absolutely no feeling among Greenwich Democrats that he ever betrayed or deserted the party here.  And the local party's institutional memory is as keen as ever.

Let's also not forget that Joe Lieberman grew up just minutes away from us in Stamford, so we should be pretty favorably disposed toward him.  But we know both men well and we know which is the Democrat and which is the crypto-Republican.  That's why 19 of our 22 votes in May went to Ned.


thanks (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for all the kind words!  I doubt it will shut Joe up, but at least we can provide some perspective.

I should mention that I'm still not quite sure who actually came up with the 80% figure.  Here's the Courant's cite:
....an estimate based upon a front-page article in the Greenwich Time newspaper on May 30, 1989, in which Lamont defended a series of votes he took in opposition to the board majority

So it could have been anything from an actual vote tally to Ned saying, "hey, I agree with them about dog leashes 80% of the time but I have some differences."  If anyone can find the May 30, 1989 Greenwich Time, it may give us a better idea.

In any case, as I've argued, the number itself doesn't mean much.


 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox