| Cross post from Jon Pelto's Wait What?
The CTMirror has a "must read" follow up story about Governor Malloy's "request" to interview and select a finalist for the position of President of the Connecticut Board of Regents.
In the article, the CTMirror reports that, "The governor's spokesman, Andrew Doba, said the interviews aren't unusual. He noted that the University of Connecticut trustees in late 2010 allowed then-Governor-elect Malloy to interview finalists for the president's post that went to Susan Herbst."
File that one under somewhere between "misleading spin" and "out-right lie."
In fact, in 2010, Governor Rell and Governor-elect Malloy meet with Susan Herbst, as did dozens of other individuals, PRIOR to the UConn Board of Education's vote.
Then, according to press reports, including the Associated Press' national story, "UConn's Board of Trustees unanimously selected Susan Herbst at a special meeting Monday, calling her an exceptional leader in higher education who will use her enthusiasm and experience to help UConn push ahead academically and in research."
The situation that played out yesterday was very different. In this case, "the regents voted Thursday to recommend three finalists to Malloy for the president's position..." and Lewis Robinson, the chairman of the Board of Regents, who was appointed by Governor Malloy, explained their decision to the CTMirror by saying, "the governor had requested three. And I thought as a courtesy or respect to his office, it would be appropriate to accede to that wish."
This approach despite the fact that Connecticut law clearly states that it is the Board of Regents who is responsible for selecting the name of the President of the Board.
So just to be clear...
Despite what the Governor's spokesman says, there is actually a very big difference between Malloy meeting with Susan Herbst before the UConn Board of Trustees voted to make her president and the Board of Regents inappropriately voting to forward three names to Governor Malloy so that he can interview and pick one.
In one scenario, the UConn Board of Trustees was acting legally.
In the other scenario, the Connecticut Board of Regents was acting illegally.
You can read the latest CTMirror story at: http://www.ctmirror.org/story/...