| Time on Task:
Considering the particular sensitivity to your outside consulting activities, why did you stop posting your schedule in June 2012?
In calendar year 2012, how many days did you work for the Bridgeport Board of Education?
How many of those days took place on weekends and holidays when school staff was not present?
How many Bridgeport school work days were you away from Bridgeport?
What percentage of your salary did you forgo as a result of your outside consulting?
How has the $1 million contract with the State of Illinois impacted your schedule?
How has the $18 million contract with the City of Indianapolis impacted your schedule?
What other outside paid consulting projects are you doing at this time?
Violation of Bridgeport and State Bidding and Contracting Laws and Ordinances
Within the first few months here in Bridgeport, you signed more than $12 million in no-bid contracts. How many of those contracts go through the sole source process in order to get permission to sign?
Since you knew that sole source permission was needed to get around standard bidding requirements, why did you approve contracts that you did not have legal authority to sign?
Of the no-bid contracts, how many were for personnel?
Which of those contracts are related to the present 1099/W-2 controversy?
In at least one case, a no-bid contract worth over $100,000 was signed with a company you have had a close relationship with in the past. As part of that contract, the company was to bring new special education software on line starting July 1, 2012. Despite payments being made, that Easy IEP software remains unused and Bridgeport teachers continue to use the old Clarity software. Why hasn't the new software been brought on line and what is the City paying for the right to continue to use the old software, which you had claimed was outdated and ineffective?
When hired, your lack of state certification and appropriate credentials prohibited you from serving more than one year. As a result of statutory changes that were added to Governor Malloy's education reform bill, the Commission of Education has the power to waive certification requirements and allow you to stay. Have you had any conversations with Commissioner Pryor about this issue?
Media, including the blog Only in Bridgeport, has made reference to your "tolerance for dissent." On two recent occasions you left Board of Education meetings despite the fact that there were agenda items that required your participation or that of your senior staff. A review of minutes from other towns hasn't found a single instance in which a superintendent walked out on the democratically elected members of the Board of Education, who, under Connecticut statute are your employers. This action would traditionally be referred to as insubordination and dereliction of duty. Can you explain why you walked out of those meetings and how such action can be deemed appropriate?
Despite the failure of the Board of Education to adopt a budget, the original proposed budget for outside legal services in FY12 was $480,000, although the final cost was significantly higher. This year the proposed budget for outside legal fees was nearly $800,000 and your most recent Financial Update projected that spending on outside legal fees will be in excess of $1,000,000. There is not another school district in the state, including those in the major cities that spend anything close to that amount. Can you explain the excessive use of outside legal services?
You have repeatedly referenced your decision to decentralize the purchase of supplies and directed disgruntled teachers to take the matter up with their principals. However, you've never referenced the fact that you reduced the supply line item by 50% before you shifted responsibility to the school leadership. Since it is widely known that there weren't sufficient supplies to start with, why did you make such a drastic cut to expenditures for supplies and why haven't you informed teachers and principals that they are expected to meet expectations with far fewer resources?
You have made school safety a priority for your tenure and yet staff was not properly informed about a recent case in which a student's threats were so serious that they led to the student's arrest. In this hyper-sensitive environment about school safety, how is it possible that there was such a complete breakdown of communication within the school community?