| Cross post from Jon Pelto's Wait What?
A new Connecticut-oriented pro-corporate education reform blog has appeared.
The stated reason?
"Unfortunately, the naysayers and protectors of the status quo seem to be the only ones being heard. There needs to be an informational voice to even the playing field, to hold the obstructionists accountable and most of all, put the kids first!"
This rationale comes from the blog's owner, Pat Scully, a political operative, apologist for Governor Dan Malloy and former press aide to the Connecticut Senate Democrats. Scully also worked for a brief period of time for Sullivan & LeShane, a Republican serving lobby company. In addition, Scully served as the campaign manager for former gubernatorial candidate Jim Amann.
Scully's press release claims that his blog, "is intended to be a balancing and informational source for readers to get objective information about education reform in the state."
Scully's press release implies that the new blog is not affiliated, in any way, with ConnCAN, 50CAN, StudentsFirst, Achievement First, Council for Education Reform or any of the other corporate education reform groups.
However, in a rather funny side note, the graphic of the graduation cap on his blog is virtually identical to the one used on the ConnCAN, 50CAN, RI-CAN, MINNCAN, PENNCAN, NYCAN and MarylandCAN blog sites. [Interestingly, Scully's new website also shares the same internet server as 50CAN, MINNCAN, MarylandCAN AND GNEPSA.ORG (the front group for Michelle Rhee's StudentsFirst organization).
Scully has devoted his first post to the task of rebuilding Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch's image, by revising the facts associated with Finch's failed attempt to do away with a democratically elected board of education and replace it with one appointed by the mayor.
According to Scully, Finch is saying that his effort to prevent Bridgeport voters from choosing their own board of education was completely misunderstood. Finch explains, "I'm a father first and a mayor second...The coalition that supported the change was made up of more than 14,000 parents, some of whom I see when I put my kids on the bus."
According to Scully, the problems were all associated with the elected board of education. He writes, "It was an elected school board that threw up its hands in July of 2011 and asked for a state takeover. Fast forward past a lawsuit and a special election, the city has new board. However, with the required minority representation, there is no evidence the board will be able to do what it's supposed to do, particularly pass a budget. Again, no consideration of what's best for the kids."
I guess Scully missed about 99% of the facts surrounding the events leading up to the Malloy Administration's illegal attempt to take over the Bridgeport Schools, nor has he actually been to a board meeting or he'd realize that his comments about a "failing" board are completely untrue.
Scully, like the rest of the Finch operatives, never manages to explain why he thinks minority representation is destroying Bridgeport when it works perfectly fine in more than 150 of Connecticut's elected school boards.
Apparently winning controversial votes by a margin of 6-3 rather than 9-0 is just not sufficient for politicians who want to make sure there are no questions or opposition to their proposals.