Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

CT-05: From Sam Caligiuri's world of make-believe

by: ctblogger

Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 17:17:19 PM EDT


Be prepared to laugh out loud!

The Republican candidate for the 5th Congressional seat (who apparently thinks that the state's motor vehicle cell phone law doesn't apply to him) peddled this piece of nonsense to reporters today.

Just-released poll numbers show that Sam Caligiuri is well positioned to win in November.

Today the Caligiuri Campaign released poll results showing that Sam Caligiuri, the Republican Nominee for Congress (CT-5), is a single point behind Chris Murphy.  This amounts to a statistical tie.  In a head-to-head matchup, 39% of respondents favored Caligiuri while 40% favored Murphy. This represents a huge gain for Caligiuri and a significant loss for Murphy, as Murphy was leading Caligiuri 49% to 28% in an October 2009 poll conducted by the same firm.

Adam Geller, the nationally recognized pollster whose company, National Research, Inc., conducted the poll notes that polling under 50% "bodes poorly" for an incumbent, and Murphy is under 45%.  "All of the evidence points to an incumbent who is losing steam, and a challenger who has essentially closed the gap," said Geller.  He added that Caligiuri "tied the score at the end of the 3rd quarter" and has "all the momentum heading into the fourth quarter."

"This is proof that Chris Murphy's support for Nancy Pelosi's far-left policies is catching up with him, and that my message and record of fiscal conservatism is resonating.  Voters in our District did not want Obamacare, but Chris Murphy wants to take that legislation even further and create a public option.  Voters did not want the Wall Street bailouts or the so-called 'stimulus' package Murphy voted for, and they do not want the Cap and Trade bill he co-sponsored.  He is out of touch with his constituents, leaving them desperate for better, more responsive leadership in Washington," said Caligiuri.  "I am thrilled that the fiscally responsible policies I am promoting are giving them hope that we can reverse this course and get our economy growing again."

Other key data points from the poll show that:

In the hard re-elect question, only 36% believe Chris Murphy has performed his job in Congress well enough to deserve re-election, while 45% think it's time for a new person.

In an ominous sign for the party in power, only 29% of voters believe the county is heading in the right direction, while 63% believe things are off on the wrong track.  This number has gotten worse over the past 10 months: In October, 2009, the right direction/wrong track number was 35%-54%.

The generic ballot favors Republicans, 41%-38%.  Among unaffiliated voters, the generic Republican leads 38%-32%.

In the "gas pedal/brake pedal" question, 54% prefer a Republican who will oppose Obama and Pelosi, and 36% prefer a Democrat who will support Obama and Pelosi.  This represents a stunning shift from October, 2009, when 41% preferred a Republican and 40% preferred a Democrat.  Among unaffiliated voters, 57% prefer a Republican and 31% prefer a Democrat.

The August 30-31 poll surveyed 400 likely voters in Connecticut's Fifth District. National Research, Inc.'s clients include the National Republican Congressional Committee, Governor Chris Christie, and Republican elected officials throughout the country.


Notwithstanding the fact that National Research Inc is a conservative outfit that's recently been accused of push polling, the fact that Caligiuri's camp didn't provide the poll's methodology or party affiliation of the laughable 400 residents polled should sound a journalist's alarm bells.

Unfortunately, some news outlets in the state took the bait without asking any questions... as in the in the case of the Danbury News-Times reporter Robert Miller, who just filed this embarrassingly one-sided article...

ctblogger :: CT-05: From Sam Caligiuri's world of make-believe
A poll conducted by a firm that works with Republican politicians found that U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy and his Republican challenger, state Sen. Sam Caligiuri, R-Waterbury, are in a statistical dead heat in their 5th District race.

The poll, conducted by Adam Geller of National Research Inc. of Holmdel, N.J., surveyed about 400 voters in the 5th Congressional District.

The poll showed those questioned favored Murphy over Caligiuri by 40 percent to 39 percent , a statistical tie.

[...]

Romero Grossman said they attribute the change to voters learning about Caligiuri and liking his message of fiscal conservatism.

At the same time, she said, voters are finding fault with Murphy for his alliance with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"He's promised to be an independent voice in the House, but he's voted with Pelosi something like 90 percent of the time,'' Romero Grossman said. "That's not independence.''


Here's what Congressman Murphy's campaign had to say about this nonsense.
With the clock ticking and Waterbury State Senator Sam Caligiuri falling further and further behind in fundraising and grassroots support, Caligiuri has revealed that he was behind a desperately slanted, negative poll recently commissioned in the Fifth District.  Last week, Murphy for Congress heard from constituents who were on the receiving end of a biased, anti-Murphy poll in the field, and so it's no surprise that the results are just as slanted as the poll.

Surveying a miniscule sample of 400 voters (for comparison, the Quinnipiac Poll surveys 1,000 voters), asking biased questions, and hiding methodology, response rate, and the party affiliation of the sample, Caligiuri released phony numbers today as a way to build support for a campaign to which very few people are paying attention.

"Caligiuri has a broke campaign treasury, no statewide or national buzz, and a fractured Republican party that only gave him 39% of the primary vote.  Frankly, the only way for him to generate any attention to this race is to manufacture phony results with a slanted poll.  Our campaign's internal polling has always shown us with a solid double digit lead, so we know this slapdash poll doesn't add up.  We got several calls from furious constituents last week after they received this poll, so we knew there was one in the field trying to create a manufactured head-to-head number.  Now we know it was Caligiuri," said Kenny Curran, Murphy's campaign manager.

Meanwhile, all the major political prognosticators agree that Murphy is in a great position to be re-elected to Congress. Congressional Quarterly ranks the race as a "safe Democrat," Stuart Rothenberg rates the race as "Democrat favored," Larry Sabato puts it in the "likely Democrat" category, and Charlie Cook rates it as "likely Democrat."  As of the last filing with the Federal Elections Commission, Murphy had $1.49 million in the bank; Caligiuri had $95,000.

"As proof of his real motivation behind these manufactured numbers, Caligiuri couldn't wait more than fifteen minutes to send a fundraising plea based off of his cooked poll," said Curran.


Maybe Bob Miller of the News-Times could extend the courtesy of grabbing a comment from Congresman Murphy's campaign before his online slanted article goes to print later tonight.

UPDATE: Apparently, Miller woke up to reality and updated his write-up...

A poll conducted by a firm that works with Republican politicians found that U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy and his Republican challenger, state Sen. Sam Caligiuri, R-Waterbury, are in a statistical dead heat in their 5th District race.

However, Murphy's campaign director, Ken Curran, called the poll "desperately slanted" and "negative.''

"We heard about it from voters in the district,'' Curran said Tuesday. "We heard there was a pollster calling people up, saying negative things about Chris."

[...]

in a press release Tuesday, Curran said Geller's poll results are at odds with respected national organizations tracking the race, all who call the race safely in Murphy's favor.

"Our campaign's internal polling has always shown us with a solid double-digit lead, so we know this slapdash poll doesn't add up,'' Curran said in the press statement.

He also pointed out that in last month's three-way Republican primary, Caligiuri only got 39 percent of the Republican votes.

Curran also said Caligiuri has "a broke campaign treasury'' and "no statewide or national buzz.''

According to reports filed to the Federal Elections Commission, Caligiuri has $80,285 cash on hand, while Murphy has nearly $1.5 million cash on hand.

"This (poll) is no surprise,'' Curran said. "I guess it's what you do when you're running out of money and only have 39 percent of Republican support.''

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
National Research had Nancy Johnson beating Murphy in 06 (0.00 / 0)
..right down to their last "poll", at least the one for public view. Murphy trounced the godawful Nancy Johnson by 12%...

To add (4.00 / 1)
Not only did Murphy crush Johnson in 06, in Danbury, Murphy beat Johnson on every single voting machine in the city.

[ Parent ]
GOP rebound (0.00 / 0)
My personal theory is that the news media in general, and of course Fox in specific, are pushing the GOP as the favorites this Fall to maintain the status quo.  If they covered the rift between every Tea Party candidate and their GOP primary opponent, if they pointed out how many of them want to eliminate not only "Obama-care" but also Social Security and Medicare, if they cared to show that the GOP really is "the party of NO" by opposing EVERYTHING that Obama does even when he is now advocating business-friendly tax cuts even bigger than the ones they proposed, if they showed that the Bush tax cuts and costs of the "War of Choice" dwarf all the spending on social programs, if they reminded the electorate that "Obama-care" hasn't even started yet so it can't be blamed for the current economy, if they also reminded people that it was the GOP that trashed our economy and began the first "bailouts" - if they even covered ANY of the above, the Democrats should overwhelm the GOP at the polls this fall.  But they shirk their responsibilities and cave in to GOP candidates who threaten or actually do remove their advertising in a direct assault on the concept of a "Free Press".  And they're lazy, taking "news" from anyone who will hand it to them, which in too many cases like the example you cite above, are from wealthy Republicans who want to buy the election (and are quite likely to do so with the help of a complicit and/or incompetent press).

Caligiuri Accomplished... (0.00 / 0)
What he set out to achieve.  By slowly leaking the results and the questions, he's generating a several day story -- one that would likely be ignored by a majority of the press (and this site entirely) if he had released everything at once.  To wit, he will generate some meaningful attention (how much is yet to be determined) and may warrant a careful reexamination by the RNCC.

If generic polling is correct (i.e. that there is an electoral excitement advantage and a generic ballot advantage for Republicans) than Murphy will have a competitive race.  The 5th may be trending moderate, but a wave opposite Murphy -- and a competitive Caligiuri in Waterbury -- will make this race close.


The problem with this theory (0.00 / 0)
..is that we haven't yet seen any tangible support by the RNC for either CT-05 or CT-04. Caliguiri and Debicella are basically on their own, woefully underfunded in comparison with Murphy and Himes, and as such both are expected to lose. There simply isn't enough money to go round for these races when there are easier targets elsewhere.

[ Parent ]
Regarding the Money Argument... (0.00 / 0)
We just witnessed a seriously underfunded Dan Malloy demolish Ned Lamont.  I realize the caliber of candidates is different, but your argument alone hinges on money.  That said, in this environment, with so much uncertainty, anything is possible.

Additionally, if you examine the Himes/Shays results from 2008, turnout in Bridgeport was historically high and I just don't see a scenario that allows Himes to duplicate same in 2010.  If he fails in this regard, then Debicella wins -- if for no other reason that he's got an R next to his name and a tidal wave behind him (note: this assumes that the polling I linked to above is -- and continues to be -- a sound reflection of reality).


[ Parent ]
In what alternative universe? (0.00 / 0)
I outlined more reasons than just money.

For Caligiuri and Debicella a good showing (within 5% or so) would probably be the best either can hope for at this point.

Without any substantial reasons to turf either Chris Murphy or Jim Himes based on their own job performance it's reasonable to assume both are quite safe at this point, teabagger protestations notwithstanding.


[ Parent ]
Academic Arguments Aside.... (0.00 / 0)
I'm sure you recognize that political elections aren't quite so sterile.  Job performance means nothing in the face of tidal wave or a shifting hostility in the electorate.  

Moreover, I think this is just the start of the "support" you referenced in a previous comment.


[ Parent ]
If it were close the checks would already have been written (0.00 / 0)
They haven't been, and likely won't be.

Early money is also much more valuable than late money.


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox