Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Lamont Talks Transportation

by: spazeboy

Wed Jun 30, 2010 at 17:13:44 PM EDT


( - promoted by ctblogger)

(Cross-posted from Spazeboy.net)


Yesterday, Ned Lamont released his plan to get Connecticut moving again. To mark the occasion, he took a ride on Metro North from Stamford to New Haven, accompanied by his running mate Mary Glassman and State Rep. Brendan Sharkey. Together, they walked through the train, stopping to chat with commuters and also taking time to discuss Lamont's transportation plan with reporters (and blogger) in attendance. The New Haven Independent, New Haven Register, and the Stamford Advocate all published good articles about yesterday's train ride.

I had a chance to read through the plan myself, and it is full of ideas that are hard to disagree with. Increase the frequency of rail service from Hartford to Springfield, prioritize transportation infrastructure (like bridges!) repairs and maintenance, and to boost the number of flights to and from Bradley Airport. Dan Malloy touches on a lot of these themes in the transportation section of his own website. Ned and Dan are not the first gubernatorial candidates to talk about the importance of improving transportation in Connecticut, making it next to impossible for either candidate to reinvent the transportation wheel. And in my opinion, it's the regional perspective that he would bring to solving our transportation problems as governor that makes the Lamont plan shine. Here's an excerpt:

We can't address transportation in pieces. We have to look at the big picture: people and products move around the entire region, not just within our borders. Yes, Ms. Johnson works in New York, but how does she get to New Brunswick for those Friday morning meetings? Does she have to switch from Grand Central to Penn Station? Yes, those manufacturing parts rode on trains from Upstate New York, but didn't they come off ships in Newark? Why did they have to loop upstate and then down to Waterbury?

* I will work with other governors to create a Northeast Transportation Authority, stretching from Washington to Maine, with responsibility for road, rail, ports, and airports.

The Authority will improve existing routes, streamline transfers, and clear chokepoints. In the shorter term, it will help make our network seamless-why can't CT Transit, MTA, PATH, NJ Transit, and others share a single "smart card"? In the longer term, the Authority will be a magnet for federal funds and allow states to pool resources, so we can achieve great things-why can't the train go New York to New Haven in an hour?

In speaking with Rep. Sharkey on the train, I learned that when many people think and talk about transportation in our small state, they carve it up into chunks. Folks in Fairfield County want to see less congestion on 95, people in Waterbury and Danbury want more transportation options, and those of us in the I-91 corridor want to high speed rail to connect New Haven, Hartford and Springfield. Those regions of the state (and their transportation concerns) are interrelated, and addressing any of them would have a positive impact on the others. Taking a wide view on the transportation problems that the state faces as a whole would go a long way toward alleviating them. Lamont's plan does one better, and not only looks at what can and should be done within Connecticut's borders, but proposes thinking of our state in its regional context. What if we could work with neighboring states on streamlining travel between Washington, D.C. and Portland, ME? It would probably mean more federal funding for transportation infrastructure improvements in Connecticut.

spazeboy :: Lamont Talks Transportation

Ned Lamont talks about the regional aspect of his transportation plan

Transportation is a tough nut to crack, but I think that the regional approach is the best way to crack it. Connecticut is a small state, but it sure doesn't feel like if when you need to get from Hartford to New Haven or Bridgeport.

The regional aspect of the plan, while most interesting to me, is not the only highlight. For instance, Jay Dockendorf asked Ned what he'd like to see the future of commuter transit look like in Connecticut:

"I want to see people using their iPads or PDAs to check train times, able to access every single rail line with an electronic pass they'll be able to electronically bill," [Lamont] said of the scene to come in New Haven's Union Station lobby.

"And it'll be busier, and you'll be able to bring your bike," added Mary Glassman, his running mate for lieutenant governor. Glassman, who's been campaigning on two wheels this year, joined Lamont on the train ride Tuesday.

Mary O'Leary's report in the New Haven Register touches on how improving transit in the state will bring people to Connecticut:

State [Rep.] Brendan Sharkey, D-Hamden, joined Lamont and Glassman for the ride and said he is backing the team because of its transportation plan. He is a big supporter of upgrading the state's ports by connecting them to rail lines to move goods.

"People don't want to move to this part of the state because it's too hard to get around," Sharkey said, but taking traffic off the roads will change that.

All in all, Lamont's transportation plan is a good one, that dovetails nicely with his business plan for Connecticut. Check out the transportation plan here, and the business plan here.

Poll
What do you think of Ned Lamont's transportation plan?
I like it.
I don't like it.
I haven't read it.

Results

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Impressed (4.00 / 1)
I was very impressed with the scope and thought that went into Lamont's transportation plan.  What is particularly impressive is not only that it takes the needs of the whole state (and bordering states) into account, but that he looked at ALL our transportation issues AND our assets -- highways, rail lines, ports and airports -- and considered where issues might be solved by expanding and developing under-utilized assets.  It isn't more of the same old hand-wringing we've heard for so many years, but a fresh look and innovative ideas that, if implemented, will make CT a much more attractive place for residents and businesses.  



Those of us along the I-395 cooridor would like rail service from New London to Worcester, MA (4.00 / 1)
and beyond and with a link to Providence, RI.  Also would be nice if Worcester, MA had more frequent commuter rail service to Boston during the rush hour.

I'm glad that Ned included a rail plan from Maine to NJ.  I would extend it to Washington DC.  Building a regional train service is one of my ideas I gave to Ned in person and on MLN during his live blog session.  There's no reason why New England can't have a dependable and frequently run rail service like Europe does.  One big selling point, especially for skiers in winter, is saying public rail promotes quality family time.  Instead of fighting car traffic and falling asleep during long distance driving, families can let the trains do that work while they, the family, socializes together, play games together, have dinner together, etc..  Also the building of this network creates jobs.  


Spoken like a true politico (0.00 / 0)
Classic Lamont: mixed signals, going from Yellow to Green to Red.

I am pressed for time, but I'll pick out the highlights/lowlights:

Any transportation plan that does not include the lowest-hanging fruit - educating travellers about alternatives - is not good. I bicycle almost every day. If I had a nickel for every time I have been honked at or told to get on the sidewalk, I could stripe every road in Connecticut with bike lanes.

As with many cycling/pedestrian and alt-trans advocates, I have grown tired of hitting my head against the wall with ConnDOT.

Any transportation plan that misses administrative agency reform is not a plan. With Joe Marie gone, this gives an opportunity to dream large.  ConnDOT has only had a half-time bike/ped coordinator for more than a decade.  ConnDOT ranks as one of the worst DOT's nationally, alongside Mississipi and Alabama for bike/ped funding. Exploring the transformation of the CT Department of Tar to the CT Department of Transit would give me confidence.

Instead, Ned gives mixed signals. In February of this year he said he would pause the New Britain to Hartford busway, but he failed to offer an alternative. Considering that ConnDOT has already spent millions in taking properties along the busway by eminent domain, disrupted businesses and so on, I am not confident in his leadership on this issue. How to replace it? What do we do with the former thriving businesses that are now massive empty lots on New Park Avenue in Hartford while we wait for a decision?

Ned's plan has no mention of streetcars. Listen to Toni Gold here. Let's see a resurgence in street cars (Farmington Avenue all the way from Downtown Hartford to Plainville), and help grow the economy by inviting foreign companies that manufacture streetcars to Connecticut. Or, let's just build our own streetcar companies.  A Nutmegger used to be able to take streetcars all the way from Hartford to Meriden to Lake Compounce back to Hartford. Saying "Let's get cars off the road" is so obvious as to be obsolete. Maybe Ned is taking baby steps.

Any transportation plan that does not set hard numbers for moving people back into cities and set goals for how many cars we will take off the road, and set goals for reduction in carbon emissions is neither progressive nor of value in the current transportation debate.

People won't move into the cities until they are perceived as safe. Ned - if you win, forget the Governor's mansion. Move within walking distance of the state capital, like Lawrence Street or Babcock Street in Hartford. Think Corey Booker here. Be an urban pioneer and live in a walkable neighborhood.  Fight for the neighborhood to be safe if you think its not (this may entail approaching other policies like drug war that Ned is uncomfortable addressing). Cities are to be used 24 hours a day, not 9-5.

I see no solid numbers for budget, either. Ned wants to pay for his visions with federal grants and not raiding special transportation funds. Great. With $2 billion in pending cuts, exactly where are infrastructure funds going to come from? How much is it going to cost to implement your "plan" and where is the money going to come from?

this is an opportunity to show Weicker-like brass ones and promise a $5 a gallon gas tax.  Let's invite the 30,000 people protests on the front lawn of the Capital.  There is a direct correlation between the oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico and our inability to divorce the car.  Make people pay for their cars and building a streetcar network. Freedom to travel ain't free. And it is costing future generations the ability to survive as a species.

The trick here is to create parallel infrastructures, building one, while tearing down another, and paying for both simultaneously.  It can be done, and will be done.  But we need leadership, not blinking traffic lights, to do it.

   


Transit (0.00 / 0)
It seems that most of the issues you have with Lamont's plan are the ideas that aren't included.  You have written about these ideas in your comment, and they're all good ones.

I think it's worth noting though, that they are not incompatible with Lamont's transportation plan as it is.  Just because some of the things you mentioned are not included in the plan does not mean that they can't/won't be included in an implementation of it.

The resignation of the current DOT commissioner creates a good opportunity, and I hope that the next governor seizes it.  I've heard from people who know transit far better than I do that the DOT would be better described as the DAT:  Department of Auto Transportation.  New leadership will hopefully change that impression.

|Spazeboy.net|Spazeboy's Guide to Political Videoblogging|


[ Parent ]
Regional Transportation (0.00 / 0)
A number of groups have been advocating the regional approach to public transportation.

Both the "Knowledge Corridor" (New Haven to Springfield) and the Central Corridor (New London to Amherst) have seen renewed interest in expanded freight and passenger service. Massachusetts recently purchased the CSX line from Worcester to Boston and will be turning it into high-speed commuter service:

The New England Regional Rail Coalition

http://www.springfieldrail.org...

Tiger Grant application

http://www.ct.gov/recovery/lib...

Rail advocates work to give 'Central Corridor' plan locomotion

http://www.gazettenet.com/2010...

These are all initiatives that benefit the region and the more attention they get the better.


 
1 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- Jon Kantrowitz
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox