Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Honoring our core values

by: Jim Himes

Fri May 28, 2010 at 12:26:25 PM EDT


( - promoted by ctblogger)

As we approach Memorial Day and honor those who have given their lives in devoted service to our country, I think it's worth thinking about what it means for someone to raise their hand and say, effectively, "I will die for you. I will die for the values and ideas that undergird this nation." Seems to me, there's no reply other than "Thank you". And even that feels inadequate.

Congress has been debating an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill that would initiate a clear process to repeal the unfair and outdated "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that bans gay men and women from serving in the military.  The amendment in the House of Representatives is offered by my colleague Rep. Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania, an Iraq War veteran.

I voted for and wholeheartedly support this amendment.  It passed the House last night 234 to 194.  It's time to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

In the seventeen years since this discriminatory policy was enacted, more than 13,500 dedicated, well-trained patriotic soldiers have been kicked out of the military just because they were gay or lesbian.  I would urge you to read some of their stories here.

Unfairly denying these men and women their rights in the military does a disservice to the nation's historic commitment to fundamental human rights.  It also undermines our military readiness capabilities at a time when the military is stretched thin and fighting two wars.  Many service members are on their third, fourth or fifth deployments.  Yet, in the last five years, the military has discharged almost 800 mission-critical troops and at least 59 Arabic and nine Farsi linguists under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Other countries that have fought with us, including Australia, Israel, Great Britain and Canada, have shown that their policies of non-discriminatory open service have had no adverse effect on enrollment or retention.

When the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was introduced as a separate measure last year I was proud to join with 192 House members as a co-sponsor.

This piece is cross posted on my campaign blog.

Jim Himes :: Honoring our core values
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Wish it didn't have to be an Amendment (0.00 / 0)
but that is the Game.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."

An overdue end to a ridiculous policy (0.00 / 0)
Why does it always seem to take forever to get common sense legislation passed?  Thanks Jim, for cosponsoring this bill and seeing it through.

Connecticut Bob

At a time that good intelligence is so critical to our national security (4.00 / 1)
the fact that we are letting Arabic and Farsi speakers go because they are gay is beyond stupidity. It's CRIMINAL stupidity. It's putting people's lives at risk because of some ridiculous prejudice that my most of my kids' generation can't even understand. They've grown up with an understanding and acceptance of their gay and lesbian peers that put their elders to shame.

Thank you, Jim, for voting for common sense and decency, not to mention the right thing for national security.  


Equal Rights (0.00 / 0)
Glad to hear you voted for this important piece of legislation. It's time, folks, to come into the 21st century.

Or at least (0.00 / 0)
the 20th Century

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."

[ Parent ]
Actually, I would like to make a statement here (0.00 / 0)
I don't like this kind of post from candidates. I would rather see (and am more likely to read) a post from a constituent with links back to the source.

I kind of resent it when politicians (even ones I support) cross post their op eds or website texts. It rings hollow to me, as it is more likely to have been written by an aide, or vetted by a PR/Communications person.  

When every word is measured, weighed, and finessed - even when I agree with it - we might as well post the press releases, which I do when appropriate.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


Interesting point, but I would suggest another viewpoint (0.00 / 0)
There is so little coverage of our politicians in the traditional press, and that which does make it into print is usually grotesquely disfigured by the of likes right-wing hacks like Ken Dixon and Neil Vigdor.

I don't mind a candidate or an elected Democratic politician using this forum to tell us his position on an issue, or to let us know about his vote.  We are free to discuss his statement or votes here, and that candidate receives feedback that he wouldn't ordinarily receive.

Daily Kos likewise includes several posts by Democratic politicians as well as Democratic pundits in the traditional media, like Keith Olbermann.  There, too, we are able to read extended columns from those politicians that we wouldn't otherwise see, unless we went to their individual websites.

I acknowledge Tessa's concern that this site could be used to propagate facile statements that obscure rather than illuminate.  But I don't think that has happened yet.  And given the level of critical thinking by the denizens of this blog, a politician will think twice before blithely spewing out PR.  Indeed, I would like to see Democratic politicians use this space even more to tell us about votes they've cast and why they voted for a particular bill.  That is even more important on the state level.  Apropos of the energy bill, I appreciate Tessa's linking to the text of the bill. But I admit to being flummoxed by the dense language, and I still don't really understand the real thrust of that bill, even after reading through about half of that tedious text.

Concerns acknowledged, but I don't see that happening yet.


[ Parent ]
Agreed, thomashooker but (as always, there is a but) (0.00 / 0)
It is too "dangerous" to post explanations of votes. Unfortunately. The deeper the politicians go inside the bubble (or beltway) the more difficult it is to be natural and real.

Luckily for the Republicans, Dan Debicella started out phony and slick so there will be no crowd of constituents asking for deeper explanations. He can dance and nuance all he wants without any pushback.

Jim Himes is not so lucky. He has a thinking constituency. I have always found him to be fair and forthright in his responses to questions, criticisms, and appeals. He doesn't necessarily vote as I want, but he can explain to me why he won't. And I am not even a real constituent (I live in Rosa's district).

I am sorry to say that Senator Dodd fell too far into the bubble/beltway. He was unable to negotiate the communications gap between Influencers (by which I mean those close to him on a regular basis) and constituents, in much the same manner that he seemed baffled by the difference between "bloggers" and "the press". The distance was enormous and unbridgeable.

Rosa DeLauro has a distinct advantage over all other politicians in her ability to engage at all levels. And engaging also includes disagreeing with you. Which she does. Often and forcefully. I don't mind. I like honesty.

Anyway, that's my but.

Though I wish this was:

you are beautiful butt...

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


[ Parent ]
Informative and amusing!!! (0.00 / 0)
As is any great essay.  Dodd most seriously disappointed me in his inexplicable adherence to that SOB Lieberman.  Let's hope that Barack Obama never- and I do mean never- lifts his little finger to assist Joe Lieberman.  

I agree with you that Jim Himes doesn't always vote the way I would like.  And, frankly, as a former Peace Corps volunteer, the attempt by our entire Democratic congressional delegation to install Chris Shays as director of the Peace Corps still rankles.  But Mr. Himes has stood up for the repeal of DADT, for the stimulus bill, for health care reform, he's built an excellent environmental record, he stood up for Ned Lamont when virtually no DTC chairmen and only one major elected state official (George Jensen) would do the right thing for Ned.  And he's taken on Wall Street and supported the financial reform bill that Wall Street and the Republicans hate.  So overall he's on our side.

I wish I knew more about Rosa.  I've never seen her speak in person.  But I'd like to some day.

But I don't mind a thinking political leader posting an explanation of a vote here for his thinking constituency.  Something is better than nothing, and for heaven's sake it's far better than the distorted snark that we get out of Hearst, or, for that matter, the slime we just got about Jim Himes from WNPR.  Might I remind everyone that John Dankosky refused to address a single question I brought up, nor any of my complaints?  Do you think he could at least explain why Bill Curry is the only progressive commentator he's permitted on his show in years?  Why his show on public broadcasting, which is supposed to be an alternative to the corporate media, relies so heavily for commentary on reporters from the corporate media?  Why he has never brought on any minority commentators?  And why, for that matter, while the controversy over Sarah Littman's firing by Greenwich Time/Stamford Advocate was raging here, John Dankosky never mentioned a single word about it, or brought Sarah onto his program to explain what happened?  It's part and parcel of the make-no-waves, right-wing bias of John Dankosky's WNPR (and as the news director, that's not a distortion).  

So I have no problem with more info from our congressmen, while I do have a problem with the bias and arrogance of WNPR, which should be responsive to progressive voters and thinking residents of this state.

The more information, the better.  But we'll keep an eye on it.  And BTW, hasn't Rosa DeLauro also posted here?  Think I recall some things from her...no?

Take care, and keep up the amusing angles, so to speak!


[ Parent ]
NPR (4.00 / 1)
Mostly I don't listen to it, since they are too busy "balancing" the information to the point that the seesaw is always bumping the sand on the right side of the playground.

I just enjoy the way Chion Wolf ways "Double-U" and how I don't have to fiddle with the dial when driving to Hartford.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


[ Parent ]
Great work on DADT (0.00 / 0)
okay, not great, but good. Great would have been to drop it immediately.

But, I would like to point out that there is another couple of problems within our current military that must also be addressed.

The first is the rise in neo-nazi enrollment. As the war has dragged on the neo-nazi (and patriot) movements ave used the US Armed Forces as a place to get "training" for their shock troops. Old policies that were in place to ensure that these people did not join the military were dropped in the desire to maintain an all volunteer military while also maintaining two wars. In doing this we have bolstered the fighting abilities of those that seek to harm the domestic tranquility of our nation. The old standards for enlistment must be brought back and rigorously enforced. If we can not maintain the military capability we need to run two wars with those tat want to fight for their country, and support their country and our Constitution, then either end the foreign adventures OR reinstate the draft.

The second has to do with the rising tide of fundamentalism that is taking place in our armed forces.

http://crooksandliars.com/jon-...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/i...
http://www.informationclearing...
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/a...
http://harpers.org/archive/200...

and lest we forget
http://www.commondreams.org/he...

Our military is not about "onward Christian soldiers". It's about supporting and defending our Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. When someone in the military puts personal faith before duty to the Constitution, then they have failed in their pledge and to their countrymen and should be removed from our military. Period. G-d and guns do not mix in our armed forces.

The question is not what you are, we already determined that, we are now negotiating price.
electrealdemocrats.com Online since 3/07 -- TimetogoJoe.com Online s


Kudos - but... (0.00 / 0)
Kudos to Congressman Himes for speaking out against homophobia in this way....

But the patriotic blather ("Gotta touch THAT base") obscures and diminishes his message.  "I will die for the values and ideas that undergird this nation."  Really??  Assuming he is talking about the two massive wars we are now involved in, I'd challenge Mr. Himes to explain which specific values/ideas are so dangerously at stake.

Non-discrimination within our military is good.

But an end to bloody, unjust wars is VITAL, Mr. Himes.


 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- Jon Kantrowitz
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox