Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Dodd's Feeble "Consumer Protection" Bill

by: Jon Kantrowitz

Fri Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46:15 PM EST


Chris Dodd has decided to move forward w/o any Republican support. The Washington Post has the story:

Senate banking committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) said Thursday that he will move forward next week with sweeping legislation to revamp the nation's financial regulatory system, despite failing to resolve key differences with Republicans.

Although Dodd said he will continue bipartisan talks, by unveiling the measure Monday, he is placing pressure on GOP senators to reach a compromise by creating a sense of urgency and by forcing the closed-door debate into the open. Republicans opposed to key elements of the bill, such as new protections for consumers, would have to make their case publicly.

After months of talks, the two sides have been unable to reach agreement over the enforcement powers of a new consumer watchdog, the scope of the Federal Reserve's regulation over banks and the financing of a new authority that would allow the government to wind down large, troubled financial firms without cost to taxpayers. But with the process dragging, Dodd is introducing the bill so his committee could begin discussing the measure before the Easter recess in early April.

And yet, and yet, and yet - he's still putting consumer protection in the worst possible place, the Federal Reserve, instead of in the hands of an independent agency, which is where all consumer advocates want it:

One of the major sticking points between Dodd and Corker has been the enforcement powers of the consumer watchdog, which is likely to be housed at the Federal Reserve in the forthcoming bill. While Corker said he thought the two sides had reached a deal on the matter, other government sources disagreed. Republicans wanted an elaborate appeals process to resolve conflicts between the consumer agency and regulators charged with keeping banks in good health. Dodd expressed openness to the idea but never agreed to it.

So the Republicans, having succeeded in defanging consumer protection, now are fighting to make sure not only the teeth but the gums are removed as well. And Dodd is open to the idea!

Jon Kantrowitz :: Dodd's Feeble "Consumer Protection" Bill
It gets worse. Dodd is also likely to refuse to include language the White House wants limiting trading activity of big bans. Politico has the story:

The Merkley-Levin legislation also embraces President Barack Obama's call for curbing the size of the nation's financial behemoths, requiring large, interconnected nonbank financial firms to keep more capital on hand and place a firm ceiling on the amount of proprietary trading they can do...

Joining Merkley and Levin in supporting the Obama administration's push for these rules are Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), another member of the banking committee; Ted Kaufman (D-Del.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).

The Obama administration proposal is widely expected to be left out of the bill Dodd hopes to unveil in the coming days.

Merkley and Brown were among those Democrats who expressed strong concerns about another concession Dodd is making to Republicans: housing a new consumer watchdog in the Federal Reserve, which has been widely criticized for failing to use its existing consumer protection powers to curb predatory lending practices - especially out-of-control subprime mortgage lending - in the lead up to the financial crisis.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Wall Street gets what it paid for (0.00 / 0)
and they've paid for Dodd for many years now.  Even on his way out, Senator Wall Street can't resist helping his moneyed backers, instead of consumers.

Anyone willing to take bets on how long it will take Dodd to start "officially" lobbying for Wall Street?


The Senate is a broken institution (0.00 / 0)
and I doubt it will pass anything worthy of becoming law on this issue(or any other) but if your interested in where Dodds coming fron read the Days Ted Manns take.

http://www.theday.com/section/...  


Whether the Senate... (4.00 / 1)

is a broken institution is a matter of perspective. For the vast majority of citizens, the Senate is where progressive legislation goes to die. However if you are the Health Insurance industry, big Pharma, a giant financial institution or a multi-national corporation; the U.S. Senate is working just fine thank you.

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a

[ Parent ]
Thanks for ... (4.00 / 3)

 including the link to the Day article Keith.  Dodd says that the Senate only has 30 or 40 working days left to correct a regulatory system on financial institutions, that in his words hasn't been touched since 1934. Incredible!... I guess he has forgotten about the repeal of the Glass - Steagall Act in 1999, that tore down walls of separation between commercial and investment banks.

 Another nugget from Dodd, is his assertion that we must not aim to take punitive measures against Wall Street. Apparently, ( at least in the mind of Dodd ), creating an independent financial consumer protection agency to safeguard the public from unscrupulous and deceitful practices, is punitive.  

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a


[ Parent ]
It would be nice if..... (4.00 / 1)
the wealth creation that Dodd is so worried about would actually extend beyond those working on Wall Street.

[ Parent ]
What would be nice (4.00 / 1)
 if Dodd ad the rest of the Senate finally realized that Wall Streeet doesn't create one drop of wealth.What they do is facilitate finance which is an expense to those who create wealth.
t
Wall Street,Just like insurance Co,skim off of the true creators of wealth and the fact their percentage has become so enormous and so concentrated is whats killing economic growth.

[ Parent ]
Not ONE (4.00 / 3)
Not ONE member of the GOP is going to vote for this, so why is Dodd watering it down with GOP proposals?

What is it that makes a Democrat so spineless?

What I want to hear tomorrow is...

"I have here two bills. The first is the one I presented a few months ago. It was all Democratic ideas. The second one I have here is one that incorporates ideas from the other side of the isle, it is a compromise bill. Today I asked the members of the other party if they were going to be bi-partisan and vote for the bill that included their ideas. This is something that they never did when we were the minority party. They have all indicated that they wouldn't vote for the Democratic bill that had been compromised with their ideas and suggestions. Well, if they aren't going to be bi-partisan with their votes I see no reason to offer up a bi-partisan bill. So I am trashing the bill that watered down what we wanted to get their support since they won't support it, and will offer a bill that Democrats can be proud to vote for."

It's really simple. We invite you to the table and include your ideas so you will vote for it, and if you don't we will RAM IT DOWN YOUR THROATS the way we want it.

What has Dodd got to lose? It's not like he will be a Senator again. So go out showing the world you have the balls to do the job you were hired to do.


The question is not what you are, we already determined that, we are now negotiating price.
electrealdemocrats.com Online since 3/07 -- TimetogoJoe.com Online s


What has Dodd got to lose? (4.00 / 1)
He can't risk offending his future employer - Wall Street.

[ Parent ]
This Looks to me (0.00 / 0)
more like Dodd presenting his resume to Goldman Sachs rather than a serious attempt at reigning in the monumental Fraud that has become our "TOO BIG TO FAIL" theft of our treasury.

If "investment Banking"(Gambling) isn't seperated from Commercial Banking(Boring lendind that makes money on the spread) the BUBBLE ECONOMY Grenspan created will just create bigger bubbles to burst.


[ Parent ]
I Don't Always Agree (4.00 / 1)
.
With your positions, but you hit that one right out of the park!
.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
Rudy Marconi (0.00 / 0)
Heard Rudy Marconi on WNPR's "Where We Live".  Sounded fairly reasonable but he really has no shot at the nomination.  Is he just getting his name out or is he hoping for something else down the road?

By the way, my favorite part of the interview was when a caller told him he sounds like a Republican with his proposals so why doesn't he just join that party.  Rudy came back with, "We shouldn't be labeling ideas Republican or Democrat, we should just ask if it works or not".


Whoops (0.00 / 0)
Meant to post this on the "open thread"

[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox