Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Dodd Pursues Sweeping Financial Regulatory Changes

by: catchlightning

Wed Nov 18, 2009 at 17:18:27 PM EST


cross-posted from Working America's 'Main Street' blog

A year ago Wall Street's financial rupture sent the economy hurtling into a massive crisis, crushing tens of millions of Americans in an avalanche of unemployment, underemployment, home foreclosures, reduced incomes and lost benefits.  That financial rupture was caused by a combination of rapacious, mindless greed on Wall Street, the then-bloated housing bubble, and the failure of both regulators and of the financial regulatory structure.

Tomorrow the Senate Banking Committee will begin to take up Senator Chris Dodd's (D-CT) proposals for sweeping financial regulatory changes.  In a statement announcing the proposed legislation last week, committee chairman Dodd said:

catchlightning :: Dodd Pursues Sweeping Financial Regulatory Changes

"Over the past year, Americans have faced the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Millions of Americans have lost their homes, their jobs, and their savings - and yet, they've watched some of the people and institutions that caused this mess collect million dollar bonuses and receive billion dollar bailouts."

"Those hard working Americans are asking, what is the government doing to ensure their economic security?"

"It is the job of this Congress to restore responsibility and accountability in our financial system to give Americans confidence that there is a system in place that works for and protects them."

"We must create a sound foundation to grow the economy and create jobs."


"The financial crisis exposed a financial regulatory structure that was the product of historic accident, created piece by piece over decades with little thought given to how it would function as a whole, and unable to prevent threats to our economic security."


"For decades, Washington has failed to deliver the substantial reform we need. If we fail again this time, our economy will be vulnerable to another crisis."

Both the Obama Administration and the House Financial Services Committee have developed separate regulatory reform plans.  But in the view of most observers, Dodd's proposals would go much further in establishing a fundamentally new regulatory structure and in imposing tighter controls on financial institutions, investment instruments and trading practices -- particularly for derivatives.

In a statement released by the Senate Banking Committee, and at his press conference, Dodd marked his determination to succeed with this major regulatory overhaul:


"I will not stand for attempts to protect a broken status quo, particularly when those attempts are made by some of the same special interests who caused this mess in the first place."

"The American people have been through a lot over the past year.  I hear from them every day.  They are business owners forced to shutter their doors and lay off workers because their credit dried up.  They are senior citizens who have delayed their retirement because their 401(k) vanished.  They are ordinary Americans who did nothing wrong, but are paying a steep price.  They deserve an economy in which Americans can find jobs, manage their money, and build better futures for their families. They deserve the real and meaningful change in this bill."

Discussing two of the most critical components of his plan, Dodd continued:


"Our plan will stop abusive practices by creating an independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency with one mission: standing up for consumers. Whether taking out a mortgage, getting a credit card, or investing for retirement, Americans deserve to receive clear and accurate information, to be protected from hidden fees and abusive terms, and to know that the financial products they're being offered are safe."

"We will end "too big to fail." We cannot allow the collapse of a few firms to threaten our entire economy. Our plan will create an independent council of regulators to identify risks, so that government can act to prevent a crisis. We will have a mechanism in place to safely shut down large failing companies without destabilizing the financial system. No longer will the Federal Reserve's emergency lending authority be used to prop up a failed institution."

Other key provisions would create a single federal banking regulator; eliminate regulatory gaps for over-the-counter derivatives, hedge funds, asset-backed securities, and payday lending; require companies that sell  mortgage-backed securities to keep "skin in the game" so investors won't be sold worthless securities; and give shareholders a greater say in how executives are compensated.

Not surprisingly, the two biggest defenders of the financial status quo are not at all happy with Dodd's regulatory reform plan.  The American Bankers Association immediately attacked the Dodd plan saying it "would tear apart the existing regulatory structure only to create a new one".  And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has launched an effort to kill the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA).  These and other powerful special interests and financial industry lobbyists will no doubt be working feverishly to kill Dodd's reform plan outright, or slice and dice it until its substantative provisions are eliminated or fundamentally weakened.

From the Senate Banking Committee's summary (pdf) of those key provisions:


Consumer Financial Protection Agency: Creates an independent watchdog to ensure American consumers get the clear, accurate information they need to shop for mortgages, credit cards, and other financial products, while prohibiting hidden fees, abusive terms, and deceptive practices.

Ends Too Big to Fail: Prevents excessively large or complex financial companies from bringing down the economy by: creating a safe way to shut them down if they fail; imposing tough new capital and leverage requirements and requiring they write their own "funeral plans"; requiring industry to provide their own capital injections; updating the Fed's lender of last resort authority to allow system-wide support but not prop up individual institutions; and establishing rigorous standards and supervision to protect the economy and American consumers, investors and businesses.

Protects Against Systemic Risks: Creates an independent agency with a board of regulators to identify and address systemic risks posed by large, complex companies, products, and activities before they threaten the stability of the financial system. The agency could require companies that threaten the economy to divest some of their holdings.

Single Federal Bank Regulator: Eliminates the convoluted system of multiple federal bank regulators to increase accountability and end unnecessary overlap, conflicting regulation, and "charter shopping;" keeps in place the healthy dual banking system that governs community banks.

Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance: Provides shareholders with a say on pay and corporate affairs with a non-binding vote on executive compensation and director nominations.

Closes Loopholes in Regulation: Eliminates loopholes that allow risky and abusive practices to go on unnoticed and unregulated - including loopholes for over-the-counter derivatives, asset-backed securities, hedge funds, mortgage brokers and payday lenders.

Protects Investors: Provides tough new rules for transparency and accountability from investment advisors, financial brokers and credit rating agencies to protect investors and businesses.

Enforces Regulations on the Books: Strengthens oversight and empowers regulators to aggressively pursue financial fraud, conflicts of interest and manipulation of the system that benefit special interests at the expense of American families and businesses.

The Senate Banking Committee website has links to the newly-released official summary of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He's #4 (0.00 / 0)
.
The 15 Biggest Congressional Recipients Of Wall Street Campaign Cash

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


Too Little Too late (4.00 / 2)
Am I missing something here?  When there is absolute highway robbery by the financial industry (a major contributor to Dodd's campaign) which the average American is going to have to subsidize, all of a sudden Dodd comes to the rescue.  Like the little boy who gets his hand caught in the cookie jar, Dodd is now going to make amends.  Pretty transparent to me and I hope to others.  We need a Democratic senator, but come on folks we can do better.  Re-electing him is an insult to all.


A Couple More Links To Prove Your Point (0.00 / 0)
.
6 Congressmembers Demand Complete Audit Of Fed In Light Of AIG Counterparty Fiasco

http://www.washingtonsblog.com...

Guess what folks, he ain't one of 'em...

or this-

http://www.examiner.com/x-1842...
.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Beware of loopholes ... (4.00 / 1)
Here's one loophole in the derivatives legislation:

The four major proposals tackling derivatives -- offered by the White House, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), respectively -- specifically provide an exemption for these types of derivatives contracts whereby two parties exchange agreed-upon amounts of two currencies, either doing this over time or at a later date.

Gary Gensler, the head of the federal agency responsible for regulating derivatives -- the Commodity Futures Trading Commission -- specifically asked Congress to not add in this loophole to the various proposals.

"The concern is that these broad exclusions could enable swap dealers and participants to structure swap transactions to come within these foreign exchange exclusions and thereby avoid regulation," Gensler warned in an August letter to members of Congress. Those who drafted the bills didn't listen.

It would be worth it to scan the bill for other loopholes.

So, here is Dodd's problem -- and it's one shared by Barney Frank, Jim Himes, Chris Murphy and all other Democrats: Being the party in power, they will be blamed or credited for whatever Congress does. By watering down reforms, Democrats come across as incompetent, crooks, or liars. If nothing changes as a result of the new laws, consumers suffer, people get pissed, and either don't vote or vote them out of office.  

The watered down bills are going to rile up the banks and insurance companies anyway. (Look at what the insurance companies are doing to Chris Murphy -- running ridiculous ads against him for his vote on the watered-down health care reform bill). So, considering these attacks by the insurance companies, Murphy and the House might have well passed a much stronger health care bill, one that could have ultimately lowered the skyrocketing costs of health care by giving ALL consumers the choice of a ROBUST public option.  


You're forgetting the Democrats are not a single, march-in-lockstep (0.00 / 0)
..party, unlike the other guys.

To pass something which will likely get no republican support they still have to convince a major portion of their own party members. So it's all well and fine to say something more robust, not watered-down should be presented. But what is the point if that fails?


[ Parent ]
Democrats aren't trying hard enough (0.00 / 0)
Who did the whip count for the public option? House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson? No. Democratic Majority Whip James Clyburn? No.

The people who did the whip count for the public option were bloggers Jane Hamsher at FDL and Chris Bowers at Open Left.

Democrats can put a lot more pressure on their caucus to fall in line, but they don't.  


[ Parent ]
Considering 64 of them voted for Stupak-Pitts (0.00 / 0)
..the hateful and stupid amendment which tries to outlaw abortion, I think you're giving the Democrats far to much credit in being able to herd these cats.

[ Parent ]
possibly, but I don't think so (0.00 / 0)
The health care bill could have been stronger, especially with the Stupak-Pitts amendment in it.

Stupak-Pitts was a bargaining chip, and the Democrats seem to give away all their chips, or at least the ones that can help them get stronger legislation. For instance, single-payer was taken off the table from the get-go. It was not included in the House bill, and it never got to the floor as an amendment. But Stupak did -- it was Pelosi's call on that.

That said, I'll be happy to see 30+ million Americans get access to health care who otherwise couldn't afford it. Unfortunately, I think it may come at a high cost -- I haven't seen anything in either bill that will prevent insurers from raising rates astronomically on existing customers to make up for the money lost by things like no longer being able to deny people with pre-existing conditions.

I'm hopeful that even this weak public option will open the door to better legislation later. If the bill works, it will be a big plus for Democrats. If not, it could really hurt them.


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox