Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

Whipping the Public Option in CT

by: tparty

Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 11:28:23 AM EDT



("The CT #healthcare09 delegation arrives in @jahimes office." by CCAG via TwitPic)

Today, Beau from CCAG is twittering the huge Health Care '09 rally and lobby day live from DC. You can follow CCAG's twitter feed all day here,  photo updates here, and video updates here. This is by all accounts the largest national healthcare reform lobby day in history, and it comes at a crucial time. You can follow CCAG on twitter throughout the day for updates on meetings between Connecticut voters lobbying for meaningful health care reform - including a robust public option - and their representatives.

While most recent attention - and pressure - on healthcare legislation has been focused on the opaque workings of Senate committees and the huge egos and twisted priorities at work therein, this week Firedoglake and nyceve from Daily Kos launched a public whip count of progressive Representatives asking them for a firm commitment to vote against any health care "reform" legislation that does not include a public option that is "1. Available nationwide, 2. From day one," and "3. Answerable to Congress and the voters."

As Ben Smith from Politico points out, public whip counts like this are one of the most powerful tools available to online activists who want to influence legislation:

Legislative vote counts are one of those things that the Web can transform. They're typically closely held - counting is an insider's art - and deliberate ambiguity is a key negotiating tactic. Legislators who would prefer to vote no, for instance, might be willing to be the last vote, for a price. So while this has the effect of pushing members toward Obama's position, it also shines a spotlight on members who might prefer to stay uncommitted, or to wait for details and compromises.

Getting only 40 progressive Representatives to commit to voting against meaningless "reform" legislation without a public option may be the best way to force the Senate's - and White House's - hand on the public option. The Firedoglake whip count tool is here, but it only targets 100 progressive Representatives who they believe to be the lowest hanging fruit. Only one Rep from Connecticut - DeLauro - is on the list, and she has yet to respond. Yet Connecticut has 5 Democratic representatives who are all signatories to the Health Care for America Now "core principles" -- 3 of whom were elected to replace Republican incumbents in 2006 and 2008 based in large part on their support for real health care reform.

There's no reason not to ask CT's entire House delegation to commit to oppose meaningless reform-in-name-only that does not include a workable and robust public option. Contact your Rep at the phone number below and ask them to pledge to vote against any bill that does not contain a public option that is (1) available nationwide, (2) on day one, and  (3) accountable to Congress and the voters, and report any response to the FDL whip count tool here.

CT-01: John Larson - Phone: 202-225-2265
CT-02: Joe Courtney - Phone: 202-225-2076
CT-03: Rosa L. DeLauro - Phone: 202-225-3661
CT-04: Jim Himes - Phone: 202-225-5541
CT-05: Chris Murphy - Phone: 202-225-4476
tparty :: Whipping the Public Option in CT
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Any Congressional Democrat who does not support the public option (0.00 / 0)
should look for work in the private sector.

More than that (4.00 / 2)
This isn't just about "support" for the public option. It's easy to "support" a public option but still vote for bad legislation that does not include one, if that's the only choice on final legislation.

This is about establishing a firm line in the sand, asking Reps to refuse to vote for any legislation that doesn't include a public option, building a bloc of progressives willing to vote against reform-in-name-only, and by doing so increase the chances that one ends up in the final legislation.

Make the public option a necessity for passage.


[ Parent ]
The Term "Public Option" has become a smoke screen . . . (4.00 / 1)
Citizens are in no mood to take most of the pablum that currently is masquerading as a "public option." If not single payer, the only acceptable health care alternative worth having is one that enables people to choose a government run, Medicare-like plan which is designed to compete with private (for profit) insurance -- thus driving down costs. Other so-called Public Options simply are designed to protect special interests and simultaneously fool the public into believing that reform is at hand. Double speak is alive and well in 2009!


[ Parent ]
just now on twitter: Himes reiterates support for public plan (4.00 / 1)
@ccag @jahimes reiterated his support for #publicoption and #HCAN at #healthcare09 meeting w/constituents today

I just got this message from @jahimes today: (0.00 / 0)
"@ConnecticutMan1 I support a public option. I've said that whenever and wherever asked. I signed HCAN principles months ago."


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
But what kind of public option? (0.00 / 0)
The public option that his so-called "New Democrat Coalition" has advocated appears designed to sharply hamper a government plan's ability to be both cost-effective and widely available.  Far from the type of cheap, broadly available insurance option that I and Dr. Dean advocate, an extension of Medicare, the "New Democrat Coalition", according to information posted on this site, wants to prevent it from effectively competing with for-profit plans.

Isn't this an example of what Krugman pointed out?  


[ Parent ]
show me the money (0.00 / 0)
How can we afford to pay for all of this?
Shouldn't we get better info before signing?
Who will make medical decisions for groups and how will that be determined,  
and the same Q for each of us personally? (by age, by the latest study?)
Will legislature and other public officials have the same care offered to the general public?

We"re already paying for it (0.00 / 0)
Medicare administration costs are 3%.For Profit insurance administation cost are between 18-22% of every dollar.

If you think your Dr. is making medical decisions autonomously now you're just fooling yourself. I'd much rather have a "government bureaucrat" who answers to congress than an insurance industry hack who gets bonuses and raises for DENYING CARE dealing with my Dr or any other health care provider.

 


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox