Why do wealthy families escape paying their fair share? The underlying problem is Connecticut's income tax rates are not progressive enough to offset the regressive nature of the sales and property taxes. Indeed, most Connecticut residents (61 percent) pay the same 5 percent income-tax rate as the wealthiest millionaires.
As policy makers contemplate the impact of severe state budget cuts that will certainly harm many Connecticut families, they must, at the very least, take action to make sure that Connecticut's wealthiest residents are contributing their fair share toward the most vital functions of state government.
The solution, as advocated by Connecticut Voices for Chidren, is a more progressive income tax. Adopting higher income tax rates for married couples who earn more than $250,000 (and individuals who earn more than $132,500), as proposed by the legislature's Finance Committee, would raise an estimated $1.226 billion in additional revenue to close the budget deficit, while affecting less than 7 percent of Connecticut taxpayers.
Even under this proposal, income tax rates on Connecticut's wealthiest residents would still be lower than the rates in most neighboring states. Of the 41 states with income taxes, only seven have a lower marginal rate for the wealthy than Connecticut.
And even with this rate increase, the share of income paid in state and local taxes by Connecticut's wealthiest 5 percent would still remain smaller than what is paid by the "bottom" 95 percent of families. That is, this change would only begin to make the state and local tax system less regressive.
In the long term, a progressive income tax could help to reduce the state's over-reliance on regressive property taxes, creating additional revenues in more prosperous years that could be used to more fully fund education at the state level. |