Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

CT Senate Passes Lyme Disease Bill 36-0!

by: CTPatriot

Sat May 30, 2009 at 19:22:58 PM EDT


With gratitude to all members of the MLN community who responded to our plea for help, I’m delighted to report that HB6200 “An Act Concerning the Use of Long-term Antibiotics for the Treatment of Lyme Disease” was brought up for a vote in the state Senate yesterday and passed unanimously, 36-0. This bill will play a vital role in protecting the doctor-patient relationship:

The legislation states Connecticut doctors will not face retaliation if they choose to diagnose chronic Lyme disease and treat it with long-term antibiotics.

"It does not say a professional should do something," Harris said. "It just says they cannot be disciplined for doing so."

Several senators spoke in favor of the legislation and told personal stories of battles with Lyme disease.

"It's not a one size fits all disease," state Sen. Dan Debicella, R-Shelton said, noting an unidentified family member has struggled with the illness. "The way it impacts one person can be very difficult from the way it impacts another."

Most interesting is that the one Senator who had originally tried to prevent the bill from coming up for a vote by removing it from the consent calendar changed his/her mind and voted in favor of it. While the Senator’s identity remains unknown, a clue as to who it may have been was found in a related article from today’s Stamford Advocate:

But state Sen. Len Fasano, R-North Haven said before the vote that he was torn over the bill.

Fasano said he understands the plight of Lyme disease victims but has also heard from physicians in his district who are very concerned about the precedent set by the legislature's choosing to ignore "evidence based medicine" and come down on the side of chronic Lyme believers.

Doctors affiliated with Yale University’s Lyme disease research center have long been among the most ardent deniers of chronic Lyme disease, so it should probably come as little surprise that a Senator in close proximity to the medical school was heavily lobbied against the bill by local physicians.

A copy of the official press release from Lyme disease advocacy groups who were involved with the legislation is included below.

 

CTPatriot :: CT Senate Passes Lyme Disease Bill 36-0!

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Maggie Shaw Newtown Lyme Disease Task Force Lancaster60@aol.com

Pat Smith Lyme Disease Association Lymeliter@aol.com

CONNECTICUT DOCTOR PROTECTION BILL FOR LYME PASSED THROUGH SENATE UNOPPOSED

 

Newtown, CT, May 29, 2009 − Patient groups across Connecticut and the nation were jubilant as the Connecticut Senate passed the Lyme disease doctor protection bill today, 36-0, following its unanimous passage in the Connecticut House of Representatives on April 30, 2009.

HB 6200 contains language that will protect CT licensed Lyme treating physicians from prosecution by the State of Connecticut Medical Examining Board solely on the basis of a clinical diagnosis and /or for treatment of long-term Lyme disease. The bill provides the definition for Lyme disease which includes “the presence in a patient of signs and symptoms compatible with acute infection with Borrelia burgdorferi; or with late stage or persistent or chronic infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, or with complications related to such an infection.” It also defines clinical diagnosis as determined by a physician “…that is based on knowledge obtained through the medical history and physical examination alone, or in conjunction with the testing that provides supportive data for such clinical diagnosis.” In addition, it provides for updating the Lyme disease definition if other strains are found to cause Lyme disease.

The final bill was the result of months of negotiations between Legislative Leaders, the Connecticut Department of Public Health and the undersigned patient Groups. According to Maggie Shaw, Newtown Lyme Disease Task Force, who has been spearheading the Connecticut effort, “Patients in Connecticut and their families will experience some relief as a result of the passage of this bill and Governor Rell’s hoped-for decision to sign it into law. Instead of having to drive for hours to other states, Connecticut residents may actually be able to receive treatment in the State for their debilitating symptoms, since the bill opens the door to a more friendly treatment climate for physicians.”

Pat Smith, president of the national Lyme Disease Association, who has been working with legislators in Hartford to secure passage, underscored the importance of the bill to patients everywhere: “This bill hits at the heart of the Lyme problem, recognizing chronic Lyme infection, long-term treatment of Lyme disease, and recognizing and defining clinical judgment by physicians. Legislators are to be commended for being knowledgeable about the problem, focusing on finding a solution acceptable to disparate groups, and taking action to make this bill a reality, a win-win for patients, doctors and the State itself.”

The Groups extend their appreciation to all the Senators, especially the sponsors. In particular, we thank Senator Jonathan Harris (CT-5), Co-Chair of the Joint Public Health Committee, and Senator Martin Looney (CT-11), Senate Majority Leader, who took time from their busy schedules prior to passage to meet with the Groups on the importance of the bill.

In the House, thanks go to Representatives Jason Bartlett, Kim Fawcett, Public Health Committee Co-Chair, Betsy Ritter, and Representatives Chris Lyddy, Peggy Reeves and all of the legislators who supported this bill. Passage in both houses would not have occurred without the support of patients, families and members of the Lyme community who wrote letters, made phone calls and testified in support of the bill and without the critical input and support of the Connecticut Medical Society. The International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society, which consists of Lyme treating physicians, also supported the bill.

The Groups have confidence that Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell will fulfill her commitment to Connecticut residents and quickly sign this important piece of legislation into law, which would make Connecticut the second state after RI to pass a specific Lyme disease protection bill. Representatives of the Groups met with the Governor’s office earlier this month.

For wording on the bill, please go to http://www.cga.ct.gov/ HB6200 (File # 903)

Lyme Disease Association, Inc.
Newtown Lyme Disease Task Force
Ridgefield Lyme Disease Task Force
Time For Lyme, Inc.
Eastern Connecticut Chapter, Lyme Disease Association

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Many thanks to all who helped make this happen (0.00 / 0)
I am especially grateful knowing that many who helped make this legislation pass unanimously are chronic lyme sufferers whose lives and energy levels/abilities often have been profoundly affected by the disease.

Thanks to each and every senator and rep who refused to bow to pressure from interest groups and helped pass this bill unanimously.

Interestingly, seems as thoughthis bill could open doors that have the potential to create economic opportunity in CT as a chronic tickborne disease research and trestment center.  (Lyme itself is just the beginning of the sh*t these ticks carry.)


What The Advocate Failed to Say . . . (0.00 / 0)
Len Fasano is described as saying that he understands the plight of Lyme disease victims but has also heard from physicians in his district who are very concerned about the precedent set by the legislature's choosing to ignore "evidence based medicine."  The so-called evidence in this case was provided by a well-paid panel stacked with people who failed to disclose their considerable conflicts of interest in their efforts to deny coverage to chronic Lyme sufferers; these people even went so far as to prosecute doctors who were prepared to treat these patients.  

The Advocate does not report the full story:

On May 1, 2008, Connecticut's Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, announced that ". . . his antitrust investigation has uncovered serious flaws in the Infectious Diseases Society of America's (IDSA) process for writing its 2006 Lyme disease guidelines and the IDSA has agreed to reassess them with the assistance of an outside arbiter.  

So much for fair and balanced reporting. . . .


When is this review going to take place? (0.00 / 0)
That's over a year ago.  Has any panel been named to conduct this review?  I browsed through the agreement on a lyme website recently and it looks like in exchange for this review panel, Blumenthal has agreed not to take certain actions.  I hope this does not represent a stalemate.

A quote link from the Lymebrary describes the maneuvers to discredit well done science:

http://lymequote.blogspot.com/

It would be helpful to name names and understand the sources of the pressure that has resulted in the legislature having to provide doctors with the freedom to do what they on the front lines judge is best to do.

There are many, many things in medicine where the research is not fully developed, and yet that does not stop people from getting sick. Doctors don't have the choice of waiting years until a perfect answer is known, and that is the flaw in Fasano's sound byte response.

I prescribe a walk in woods and tall grasses in deer country for Fasano.  Once he's had the disease, his views will change.

What IS clear is that the IDSA guidelines are flawed.


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox