Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

Resources
2007 Legislative "Heroes and Zeroes"
2007 "Worst Republicans In The State"
2007 "Worst Democrats In The State"
CT Congressional Delegation and the Progressive Agenda
CT Clean Elections Funding Explained
Federal Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
State Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
 
 
My Left Nutmeg

Senator Dodd meet-up with bloggers

by: ctblogger

Tue May 05, 2009 at 11:10:18 AM EDT


Dodd_Bloggers05

On what could be seen as a follow-up to his Q&A session with the MLN community, on Sunday, Senator Chris Dodd held an informal meeting with bloggers at the Playwright in New Haven.

From his thoughts on the credit card bill to lessons learned from his role in the fallout of the AIG bonus fiasco, any and every topic was open to discussion...and to his credit, the senator answered our questions in-depth.

In my opinion, big question during the meet-up centered around the issue of torture. Near the end of the session, I asked the senator on his  thoughts regarding the release of what's now being called the "torture memos". Specifically, I asked Senator Dodd if he thought the use of waterboarding amounts to torture and if so, should Congress a). hold hearings to address the matter and b) hold those in Bush administration who gave the green light to the use of this technique the accountable those for their decisions.


DODD: I don't know who the genius was in the room that night when they were discussing this, but if you're going to make a decision to release the documents, I presume everyone of us here would then have a follow-up question, which is: What are you going to do with that information? And if the answer is, "Well, nothing, we're just going to release the documents," I'm amazed, and some of us in the room say, "Wait a minute, you've got a problem." If you're going to release them, you're going to have to answer the next question: What are you going to do with them?

I believe that waterboarding is torture. ... Pat Leahy of Vermont has been arguing for a select committee - or a commission, I forget which he's talked about - to go and review all of this. I agree with him on that. There's some debate about whether he does it or the Intelligence Committee does it - somebody ought to do it. [...]

In a sense, not to prosecute people or pursue them when these acts have occurred is, in a sense, to invite it again in some future administration. If you think it doesn't mean anything, that you can basically do what you want and we'll somehow just say, "That was yesterday, today's today." Had that handful of people who advocated at the Nuremberg Trials embraced that view - Nuremberg became the symbol of who we were. Even these thugs got a lawyer. Even these thugs had a trial, despite their acts. So we became a symbol of jurisprudence and the rule of law. [...]

Q: Even if it goes up as high as - A lot of this stuff seems to point toward Cheney's office.

DODD: You gotta go where you gotta go.


You can view more of Senator Dodd's answers to my questions below the fold.

UPDATE: The Politico picks up on the story.

UPDATE 2: Think Progress picks up on the story.

UPDATE 3: Picked up by HuffPost.

ctblogger :: Senator Dodd meet-up with bloggers
With the AIG bonuses still fresh in people's memories, I asked the senator about what type of oversight is being done by Congress (in regards to TARP) in order to make sure that taxpayers dollars will not be used by banks in this matter again.

With the House of Representatives passing their version of the credit card bill, I asked Senator Dodd on his thoughts on the senate's version of the bill getting passed.

With the fallout from the AIG fiasco, and the series of missteps he did in terms of communicating his role in the matter, I asked Senator Dodd about what lessons he learned from the entire episode.

I want to thank the senator for taking the time to sit down with members of the online community and taking our questions. You can read more on the meet-up (as well as watch the interview in it's entirety) over at Connecticut Bob.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Please include me next time! (0.00 / 0)
I'd be very interested to join a group of bloggers in this sort of discussion/interview.


I can't find your email address (0.00 / 0)
Send it to me if you don't mind.

Connecticut Bob

[ Parent ]
OMG you're on the virtual front page of the Danbury Snooze Times (0.00 / 0)
MyLeftNutmeg.com: Dodd says he's open to torture hearings

Hey they're not wimps like the NYT.. they POSTED YOUR WEBSITE NAME IN FULL

.Adding Another Dimension of Vituperation Toxicity to Blogging since 1999!.


Dodd (3.00 / 2)
I want to like Dodd. I just watched the whole 55 minutes. Disregard my comments as you will, and consider that part of me is jealous that I wasn't asked, but I understand why Dodd's office asked certain bloggers, and not others.  

Dodd speaks with an impressive ability. He quotes Justice Jackson, and uses a golden tongue to pay homage to the deepest ideals of the American Republic, talks of the relationship with constituents - communication as an act of faith.

But it's all talk. He must do more. Judge by action, and not words. Being a supporter of something forever - like public financing - is insufficient. I want results.

Visually, in CTBloggers' clips, he stands alone at the Playwright, his back to the wall, an empty cup in front of him.

Please understand that I have the highest respect for the fact that you all volunteer, and do not receive any remuneration for this, and that time is tight. I applaud you all for your efforts. Understand, though, that I am going to be critical of those efforts, and Dodd's attempts to subvert them for his own political gain, no less than I would be critical of any other journalist and politician relationship.

First and foremost, how did Dodd's office reach out to you and set this up? Power controls by access.

Second, bloggers, if you want to take the place of paid journalists, and step into the role of watchdog on government more realistically, ask the hard questions:

- Why did Dodd fail to filibuster the retroactive grant of immunity for telecomms as he promised he would? It passed with retroactive immunity. This was a grave injustice.

- What about his refusal to zealously advocate for his anti-war constituency? What about his trip to Syria? What about unmanned aerial drones in Pakistan? 70k troops in Iraq forever? His support of Israel's Gaza bloodbath?

- No one had a list of his campaign finance contributions and went after him when he talked about major credit card companies.

- He talks about Glass-Steagall, an appropriate follow up question would have been what his relationship with Sandy Weill of Travelers was? Did Sandy Weill lobby him when Travelers wanted to merge with Citibank? In 1998, when this was happening, and subverting Glass-Steagall, Weill had given Dodd $2000 ($1k in 1996, $1k in 1998). Weill gave Dodd an additional $2k in 2003.

- What about single payer healthcare? He gives Obama a thumbs up, but read the latest from Chris Hedges on Buying Brand Obama.  

- Capping interest rates? The stability in the banking industry he talked about had also to do with the ceilings on usury.

- He's talking about home mortgage contracts, and asking us if we read our mortgage paperwork. Yet no one asked him about his Ireland cottage deals? Or Friends of Angelo? What about the unanswered questions surrounding the Countrywide deal?

Make Dodd uncomfortable. He sat through this interview without flinching. He even told Ed Anderson - "I'll take advantage of your question." Dodd dominated the conversation, running through his talking points. Dodd did this because he is astute enough to understand that you all gave Lieberman a serious headache, and he doesn't want that.

- CTBob asks him if he is running for re-election. Of course he is! What do you think the interview session with the bloggers is? This is why the volunteer blogosphere is not in the position just yet to replace the realm of the professional journalist.

- CTBloggers question on torture was solid, but I want to know when Dodd knew of torture, and what his action was, and how we can be sure this is not still occurring at Bagram, Gitmo or other extraordinary rendition sites now.

Did you feel a knot in your gut before you asked a question? If you didn't, you weren't asking the right questions. I'm not advocating for gotcha journalism, but for professional standards. Dodd needs to be held accountable, and there is not a chance in hell he would ever give me or Kevin Rennie or Paul Bass a full 60 minutes to ask him questions.

I didn't hear Paul Bass' voice once. I see Paul lurking behind Ed Anderson at about 45:00 minutes, writing about the event. But 60 minutes with Paul Bass and Chris Dodd would sound much different than this.

The last time I talked to Dodd, I got 30 seconds, and I asked about the use of illegal munitions (dense inert metal explosives, supplied by the US to Israel, used on the Gaza strip), he had no answer. He had never heard of Dense Inert Metal Explosives. A journalist's job is to stump a politician.  

Professional interviewers know where to cut him off, feel and anticipate the pauses in his speech, and interrupt with new questions, follow-ups.

Don't be seduced by the proximity to power and the access that he granted you. The fact that he reached out to you is a pure public relations ploy. His reasoning about the failure of newspapers to cover is cute, but he didn't reach out to those in the blogosphere who could actually make him uncomfortable.

And for Dodd staffers who read this, the next time you want to do a session like this, invite me, or Paul Bass, or Melinda Tuhus, or Melissa Bailey, or Christine Stuart to come along, too.        

 


more than just MLN bloggers were asked to come ... (4.00 / 2)
It was great that Dodd opened up for questions, and I'm glad that ctblogger and others took the time for the interview. The points Dodd made about torture and changing credit card laws ARE important for voters to hear.

Ultimately, though, talk matters less than results:

Judge by action, and not words. Being a supporter of something forever - like public financing - is insufficient. I want results.

I think everyone agrees with that statement. We ALL want results. If Dodd -- or anyone -- thinks that a conversation with the Senator is good enough to make us all happy and satisfied, they're nuts.

Financial reform. Health care reform. Energy reform. Campaign finance reform. Tax reform. Or else ... let these Congressmen face pissed off voters on their own (and I'll be one of them). If they don't produce, nothing any of us bloggers writes will matter anyway.  


[ Parent ]
although (0.00 / 0)
It is entirely possible that if the bloggers on hand did throw Dodd curve after curve, he never would've acknowledged that we have to go as high up in the Bush administration as needed to prosecute for torture.

[ Parent ]
ctblogger's Downratings (0.00 / 0)
I noticed he punished me the same way when I dared to criticise the propaganda piece Rosa DeLauro had him front-page a few months ago. Now, I don't know him too well, but it seems uncharacteristic of him to get bent out of shape like this. I thought your comments were spot-on, profound even. Especially this:

Don't be seduced by the proximity to power and the access that he granted you. The fact that he reached out to you is a pure public relations ploy.


"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
It's not a downrating (0.00 / 0)
It's more of a reflection of my thoughts on his comment (portions of which were completely spot-off). If I was pissed, I would have rated him a zero (which I only reserve for trolls).

[ Parent ]
you deserved it (4.00 / 3)
If you sacrificed a Sunday afternoon with your family to drive more than an hour out of your way, both ways, to videotape this interview to post on a not-for-profit blog that you run without pay -- and some asshole accused you of taking a bribe, I'd downgrade you too.  

When you make asinine comments you deserve whatever ridicule you get.    


[ Parent ]
Bribe Comment Was Satire (0.00 / 0)
And, by the way, not stated but posed as a hypothetical question so as not to be an accusation.

I'm glad Al has the dedication to work as hard as he obviously does for this and his blog. But I don't want to see this place used by these pols. Maybe he should have politely refused and spent his Sunday with his family. Isn't that what he probably might have done with Connecticut's other Senator?

A few weeks ago there was the front page story of Jim Himes meeting with the bloggers at some place in Norwalk, and I noticed that the comments to that one pretty much amounted to a big yawn.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
At the Himes meeting ... (4.00 / 3)
... it was as much about bloggers talking to the Congressman -- telling him what we expect -- as it was him giving us answers.

In other words, Jim sat there and listened to us. We talked, we argued, we commiserated. At the end of the meeting, he knew how we felt about a lot of issues. He understands far better what our expectations are now than he did going into that meeting.

At this interview with Dodd, it seems like the bloggers there had a chance to get their message across too. You don't want to pass up an opportunity like that.

That said, we all know how the game is played, but this time, there simply aren't any excuses. If Democrats don't deliver, they're gone. Dodd won't be able to say, "I voted for the bill but it failed" and so you're stuck with the same old crap. The same old crap will get you voted out of office, so these Congressman better start talking to their reluctant colleagues and get them to come through.  

I hope Senator Dodd and our other Congressman understand what the stakes are. Enough is enough. We need results.



[ Parent ]
Thank You (0.00 / 0)
And I truly hope it will make a difference with them. The Rosa DeLauro "We Must Win In Afghanistan - Support The Troops" thing was so not like this place.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
. (4.00 / 1)
Dodd won't be able to say, "I voted for the bill but it failed" and so you're stuck with the same old crap. The same old crap will get you voted out of office, so these Congressman better start talking to their reluctant colleagues and get them to come through.  

I think it's the opposite situation -- that his constituents want bigger changes than the Senate will pass, and that Dodd should wage a few symbolic (but losing) fights instead of hewing so closely to the opinions of his co-workers. See: the telecom immunity filibuster for one feel-good example.

–7.25 / –7.28

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
You owe ctblogger an apology lakezorian (4.00 / 1)
not an excuse.

I've come to your defense when others downrated you for the 9-11 conspiacy theory stuff you promote but there is no way to excuse that comment and  it deserved a big zero.


[ Parent ]
Hey, for me it was a pleasure to meet (4.00 / 3)
the good Senator, his campaign manager, Jay Howser. And of course to hang out with good ol' Chuck.

Look, going in I had easily a half a dozen tough questions prepared and ready. And obviously it would have been easy to put Dodd on the spot and make headlines. But knowing how to crash a presser, I can always do that, and instead I decided that I didn't want to beat Dodd up, but instead ask him to do his job and deliver.

So in place of Hardball, we had a conversation with Dodd, in which I tried to suggest ways in which he could deliver that might help him out of his political morass. Like really taking on the Credit Card companies with a cap on interest rates, and changes to interbank fee contracts. Or starting a federal task force to put some of the Housing Bubble fraudsters in jail, where they belong, b/c I'm pissed that so many people made out by creating such a financial mess. Or cheaper student loans!

Okay Ken will say I'm guilty for not having tried to rough up Dodd. But frankly, for the next six months I'm more interested in what Dodd might be able to do for me, than in working right now to run Dodd out of office. Isn't that where I should be at?

And that future day of reckoning is still on its way.

Come November they'll be polling not just Simmons vs. Dodd, but also Simmons vs. Blumenthal, and maybe Bysiewicz. And reality is that if Simmons is up 10% on Dodd, but down 10-15% against Blumenthal, this Democrat is going to start making some noise. And I won't be alone. Because none of us want to lose a U.S. Senate seat to the GOP for the next six years, not because of one man stubbornly refusing to retire.

Dodd needs to deliver. Not just for me or you, but for his own political future.

I've got six months patience to give him that chance. Is that a mistake?


[ Parent ]
no-brainer (0.00 / 0)
Pretty obvious why you weren't invited - they weren't looking for hardballs.  Calhoun told them not to f...in' call you.

[ Parent ]
For the record (4.00 / 8)
I am the New Media Director for the Senator's office and the one who set up this meeting. For the record Paul Bass was not only invited, but attended. Christine Stuart was invited and sent Paul in her place. A lack of invitation had nothing to do with looking for softballs but rather I simply didn't have your contact info. We also want to keep the gatherings small so that everyone gets a chance to ask there questions in the limited time we have in the Senator's schedule.

I would also like to state that in no way did we limit the topics, restrict the conversation, or demand things be left off the table. It was an open conversation and I think those in attendance would agree.

We hope to have more of these conversations in the future. If you, or anyone else would like to be a part of them, please send me an email with your name, handle, and who you write for and i will gladly add you to my list!

I would also like to say on a personal note, that I sincerely appreciate the effort and level of discourse that is demonstrated not only in this community but the other CT blogs as well. Now that there is not a single representative of CT's old media in DC, we have come to rely on all of you to report the news from Washington. Please feel free to contact me if I can help you in any way to do that.

adam_wells@dodd.senate.gov

Look forward to hearing from you!


[ Parent ]
Thanks Adam (4.00 / 5)
I appreciate your efforts in reaching out to the local blogosphere, and I look forward to future meetups with the senator.  

I concur that there were absolutely NO ground rules laid out beforehand nor was there ANY attempt to limit, steer, or restrict the conversation with the senator.  We could have asked him anything at all.  

Personally, I found it very refreshing to be able to chat with Sen. Dodd without the competitive local media there to drown out any attempts by us to ask our questions and monopolize his time.  The media has plenty of opportunities to talk to elected officials, while we (the unpaid volunteer bloggers) have to donate our time and efforts to meet with the senator, and we appreciate the courtesy of this meeting.

I'd absolutely like to do this again whenever possible.  

Connecticut Bob


[ Parent ]
Thank you for your response (0.00 / 0)
Adam

I find it refreshing that a Senator's staffer would respond so directly to constituent issues.

I will gladly accept your offer to attend the next session that Sen. Dodd hosts for bloggers. Please let me know the time and place, and I will be there. If it so happens that we can't arrange a time and place, I would be more than happy to engage in a 20 minute phone interview with Senator Dodd with the same open conversation ground rules, where no subject is off the table.

Please feel free to contact me through my website.

In the meantime, you could satisfy my current curiosity and answer any of the questions I posed in my post above.

Again, I look forward to seeing your presence regularly on MLN. It is a change of pace to have a Connecticut Senator so responsive to citizen concerns.

Peace,
Ken Krayeske


[ Parent ]
You're kidding,right Ken (4.00 / 2)
Where are these superman "journalists" you're talking about Ken?

Where was this bravery in the runup to the Iraq War?

How about during the 2006 Senate race?

Wasn't it you who were the one who said "If these guys(referring to the "journalists"n the room with you)had asked these questions I wouldn't have to" or something very similar to that at that now infamous Calhoun press conference?

Look Ken,it was an email exchange between Adam and me that got the ball rolling on this blogger meeting.I was also invited but was too ill to attend but to be honest if I was asked (which I wasn't) whether to extend an invite to you I would have advised against it simply because I think you would have taken the opportunity to attempt to make the meeting about YOU which, whether you like it or not, has come to be what everyone expects of you.

PS- Ken, Don't you think the fact that Paul Bass,Christine Stuart and Andy Bromage were all invited kind of blows your Holier than thou bullshit here right out of the water?


[ Parent ]
Pro v Citizen Journo (2.00 / 1)
Paul Bass attended, but didn't participate in the exchange, pigeonholing Dodd afterwards for a few minutes. He called it part of Dodd's image rehabilitation tour.

Dodd's office is already attempting to use Christine Stuart's CTNewsjunkie.

Andy Bromage didn't attend, so I don't know whether he would've watched or participated.

But David Simon, the creator of the Wire, and a former reporter at the Baltimore Sun, had this to say about new media today on Democracy Now!:

[H]igh-end journalism is a profession. It requires daily full-time commitment by trained men and women who return to the same beats day in and day out. Reporting was the hardest and, in some ways, most gratifying job I ever had. I'm offended to think that anyone anywhere believes American monoliths, as insulated, self-preserving and self-justifying as police departments, school systems, legislatures and chief executives, can be held to gathered facts by amateurs presenting the task-pursuing the task without compensation, training or, for that matter, sufficient standing to make public officials even care who it is they're lying to or who they're withholding information from.

Indeed, the very phrase "citizen journalist" strikes my ear as Orwellian. A neighbor who is a good listener and cares about people is a good neighbor; he is not in any sense a citizen social worker, just as a neighbor with a garden hose and good intentions is not a citizen firefighter. To say so is a heedless insult to trained social workers and firefighters.

As for great journalists who I am talking about, let's start with Amy Goodman, then go to Robert Parry, Russell Mokhiber, John Pilger, Robert Fisk, Matthew Rothschild, Dave Zirin, William Grieder, Sy Hersh, Gail Collins, Harvey Wasserman, Jeremy Scahill, Greg Palast or James Ridgeway. They were all there in 2002 and 2003 in the run-up to the war.  They remain in the thick of things now.

I highly doubt that Adam Wells (and if you would Adam, please correct me) would go ahead and schedule Dodd for a 60-minute sit-down with Greg Palast or Amy Goodman.

I'd love to see it, but I'll wager CTBob's next Guinness and a plate of fish and chips at the Playwright that it won't happen.  


[ Parent ]
Ken (4.00 / 3)
Did you learn nothing from your own experience. How many of those high minded "Professioal Journalist" came to your defense when you were being savaged and please find me one that did, even a tad, without qualifying it  by calling you a schmuck  before offering even a faint glimmer of a defense of your actions.

As for your hero Kevin Rennie,Next time you come in contact with him ask him who fed him the Irish Cottage Story.You didn't really think he was smart enough or talented enough to do the research required to uncover that on his own,Did You?

PS- I reckon you've made yourself so toxic now not even Cliff would grant you an interview.


[ Parent ]
oh please, Ken, get over yourself (4.00 / 2)
I saw Simon interviewed on the Moyers show. I really like Simon, and I even agree with his idea of a nonprofit model for newspapers, but it takes a dead-tree reporter to say something like this:

I'm offended to think that anyone anywhere believes American monoliths ... can be held to gathered facts by amateurs ... pursuing the task without compensation, training or, for that matter, sufficient standing to make public officials even care who it is they're lying to or who they're withholding information from.

As the Dodd interview makes clear, bloggers DO have sufficient standing to make public officials care about who they are. And they should. Many of the original CT bloggers -- ctkeith, CTBob, Maura, TParty, CTBlogger, Branford Boy, CGG, spazeboy, mattw, etc. -- helped Ned Lamont beat a three-term incumbent Senator in the 2006 primary and shook up the political world.

Not to mention changing the debate in CT on gay marriage, health care reform, and a whole host of other issues. To thumb your nose at such "amateurism" shows that you don't have a clue about the value of this medium. It doesn't take a "professional" journalist to track down and read a piece of legislation and know that it's crap.  

Professional journalists have every advantage, including access, a ready-made audience, and a salary. Bloggers have to earn access and earn an audience -- on their own time and on their own dime. They do it the hard way -- by writing about things people care about and by attempting to get at the truth. The "citizen journalists" at MLN, which includes you, by the way, and everyone else who contributes here, are doing precisely the thing that David Simon admitted he failed to do -- make a difference.

I'm not saying we don't need professional journalists, but even in "the good old days," many newspapers served as tools for corporate interests. (Go read Upton Sinclair's The Brass Check sometime.) They still do. The profession can use extra sets of eyes and ears wherever they can find them.

 


[ Parent ]
The Profession (2.00 / 1)
Extra eyes and ears are fantastic, and I have no doubt about the fact that bloggers add to the democratic discourse. And it is clear that bloggers are gaining the standing to make public officials care about who they are.

Yet as I contemplate my interactions over the course of my career with federal officials, it seems to me what Dodd did for MLN (a blog with 14,000 readers a month) is so abnormal in the course of newsgathering as to merit special consideration and analysis.

I sometimes wonder if MLN would be more valuable were it to be able to raise funds to pay someone to do original reporting.  There remains a difference between professional and amateur, hence the distinction, and this Dodd interview just proves it to me.  

The aggregator and commentary function that MLN serves is important. But the amount of original content that MLN develops is limited, less than half of all the posts on the page. Look at the front page right now - it is all media analysis except for the Dodd bit.

Most of the reporting here is done from the internet terminal. Just to see where I come in, I just analyzed the 52 or so posts I have done on MLN - 26 come from me directly (original, multiple source reporting at city council meetings, Congressional interviews, musings of my own imagination, etc).

The other 26 pieces are those stories where I report on Media (WNPR, WPLR, etc), my interaction with media, or where I simply echo-post a story from another source.

Out of 22 photos, I took 14 of them, and the remainder come from across the web.  

So 50 percent of the time, I am quoting someone else's work, 50 percent of the time, I am part of the echo chamber. I'm not sure what everyone else's numbers are, but I think the ratio is probably that for many, or less. If we look at a newspaper, the original content to echo-box content ratio much lower.

As I was looking through my archive here at MLN, I have four congressional interviews - Larson, Courtney (two diff posts, same interview), Himes (as a candidate) and Murphy (via WNPR). Congressional interviews are difficult to come by, and mostly impossible to secure for more than 10 minutes. Congresscritters are notoriously difficult to pin down for even five minutes.

If I look exclusively at the six years or so I spent as a full-time reporter for weekly, daily or monthly periodicals (none of which I had a federal beat for), I can easily count the one-on-one interviews I have had with federal elected officials from Connecticut:
Dodd (1 - phoner, 1998), Lieberman (1 - quick question at an event - 2007), Gary Franks (20 minutes in office interview to promote his new book, much of that time he spent watching golf and ignoring me), Nancy Johnson (1 - question at post-Bush visit, although I covered her constituent and campaign events many times, they never really included Q&A sessions), Courtney (2 phoners), Maloney (1 - at a campaigning event), Larson (2 phoners, 2 in person - one when he was running for Kennelly's seat, one when he was fundraising for Himes), Rosa DeLauro (1 question at a youth development session).

Understanding that you have to cover certain stories in order to even have an opportunity to interview Congressmen, I never even got a question to Shays or Simmons. The one phoner I did land with Dodd was when I worked for the Hartford Advocate in late 1998, and it was about limiting credit card interest rates for college students (aren't we still working on this?).

To get a  question in on Nancy Pelosi, I had to stand in a line for a book signing.  The powerful tend to insulate themselves. I have called out-of-state Senators and Congressmen and gotten no reply many more times than I have ever gotten a comment, although this happens often when you are dealing with out of state legislators.  

I may be missing a couple interviews with Congresspersons I don't recall now, but but this sums up my experience as a professional reporter - even when you are writing about pet projects of a federal legislator, it is highly difficult to land an interview with them.

Several of the in-person ones come from my covering events, for specific purposes, being out reporting, hunting down a story.  This exercise just reinforces to me exactly how rare it was what Dodd did for MLN bloggers. A U.S. Senator just doesn't go ahead and sit down for an hour with people who are going to ask him questions if he doesn't think it is safe territory.

What other Senators can you see doing this? Olympia Snow? Max Baucus? Lieberman? John Kerry? Schumer? Ted Stevens?
I just don't see it. This is why I am immediately suspicious of Dodd and his motives in granting you access. He wants to control the message, and in this medium he thinks he can.

This is the point that I am attempting to make.  

 


[ Parent ]
The Dodd interview isn't rare (4.00 / 2)
Go look at YouTube sometime and you'll see tons of interviews with politicians. Or just look at the work ctblogger has been doing -- interviews with Dodd, Lamont, Murphy, Himes and  many, many others. It's now becoming NORMAL for politicians to seek out bloggers to communicate directly with a highly engaged segment of their constituency.

Second, bloggers don't just re-use the work of other media. We separate out the bullshit from the truth. Scarce, for one, has a sort of hypocrisy radar. I don't know how he does it, but when a politician goes on TV and spouts bullshit, and the mainstream media ignores these blatant lies, you can bet Scarce picked up the interview and is going to post it somewhere for that politician to be duly ridiculed.

ThomasHooker does the same thing with the some of the local newspapers, as well as original reporting of his own.

Corporations (including the defense industry) have a vested interest in getting politicians to go on TV and spout their corporate positions to the general public (why do you think we can't have a real debate on health care?). So, we have a vested interest in calling out these lies.

As for getting paid, yes, if we could make a living doing this as a nonprofit organization that would be ideal. Maybe MLN should do what NPR does and have fundraisers a few times a year. I would chip in money to have CTblogger do this full-time.

And if you want to get paid for the work you do, ask the people who read your blog to chip in. If they value your work, they might do that.

I think your biggest gripe, though, is that ctblogger and other bloggers didn't ask the questions YOU wanted to ask -- the one about "dense inert metal explosions."

Well, that's not the one I would have asked either in a one-hour interview. We're in the middle of the biggest economic crisis and health care crisis since the Depression, and Dodd's bailiwick is financial services and health care (including insurance) -- that's where he has the greatest influence. He also has been one of the Congressman responsible for deregulating the financial industry and creating this mess. So he has a lot to answer for in that area. Dodd also has something to say about prosecuting people for torture, given his dad's experience in WWII, and this is a huge topic right now in our country. The bloggers covered credit cards, torture, and touched on the AIG thing, so that's pretty good. And like Adam said, this is going to be an ongoing conversation (I hope to be at the next one).

So, if you were going to ask about "dense inert metal explosions," then I don't think we missed much with you not being there.

 


[ Parent ]
If you look (0.00 / 0)
I suggest multiple other topics in the previous post, like single payer healthcare. Dodd is nowhere on this issue.

Progressives should not be supporting Dodd. He is part of the problem, and not part of the solution. When progressive do get an audience with him, they should put him to the test on progressive issues.


[ Parent ]
by previous post (0.00 / 0)
I meant
Tue May 05, 2009 at 15:28:23 PM EDT

[ Parent ]
torture and credit card reform aren't progressive issues? (0.00 / 0)
 

[ Parent ]
Ken (0.00 / 0)
in 2000 you supported Nader over Gore

In 2004 You supported Nader over Kerry

In 2006 you quit the Lamont campaign and the only candidates you visably endorsed were Green party members.

In 2008 I can't remember anything you did or said that would lead one to believe you supported Obama or any other Democrat.

Please excuse me if I the the record of your advice on whom progressives should support and which issues and what strategies will move us foward is pretty much worthless.



[ Parent ]
The question at bar is how much is original content? (0.00 / 0)
It's great to separate wheat from chafe, but the interrogatory should be how much wheat are we growing ourselves, without having to look elsewhere to separate truth from BS?

What happens when no one is producing wheat, what are blogs to do? When the Hartford Courant has just two reporters left, where we will get content to critique?

Or, in other words, do we start building an infrastructure now to go out an gather our own original content? That was what this interview with Dodd was, and my "Dodd" comment was a bloggers "media critique" response to that generation of original content.

Our original content has to improve on the previous model. Perhaps the comment sections are what improve upon it. I don't know.



[ Parent ]
Courant et al (0.00 / 0)
...are practically just reprinting press releases from people with a stake in what gets into the paper already -- we're already getting a lot of those same press releases, to be honest with you. See a nice thorough critique of the current state of affairs here.  

–7.25 / –7.28

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


[ Parent ]
we? (4.00 / 1)
do we start building an infrastructure now to go out an gather our own original content?

Who do you mean by we? You don't seem to trust anyone but yourself to do the job.  


[ Parent ]
Hey Ken (4.00 / 1)
Do yourself a favor and count the times you use the word I in the comment you just made.

When your done counting think about what that means.


[ Parent ]
me, me, me, you, you, you, us and them, everybody, everybody, everybody (0.00 / 0)
Exactly how else is one supposed to write about personal experience except in using the first person? Opinion originates from experience - how else is one to communicate personal history so as to provide a basis for their point of view - except by using "I"?

Long before this singular pronoun was an uncredentialed, notorious, grandstanding, impotent and itinerant rabble rousing, self-centered attention seeking whore, this person was a reporter.

In the experience of that reporter, the only time any politician ever sat down for an all-subjects-on-the-table, no ground rules interview (and even then, editors had priorities) was when they were seeking election or re-election. And before that interview, you spent days doing homework, because you didn't want them to manipulate the truth during your time together.

Ask any reporter you know if this is a familiar tale. Let's wager CTBob's Guinness and fish and chips once again that it is.

The point, once again, is that politicians do things for personal gain.  Chris Dodd has been such an effective chairman of the banking committee that for 12 years, public interest groups have been trying to cap interest rates on student loans, and he hasn't rallied his elite club to do so.  For us to get his back now, when he has known about these issues for decades and let them fester is preposterous.

Rather than a question about dense inert metal explosives (which he already proved his ignorance on - and how MLN continues to avoid the acceptance of perpetual war as a Middle East policy espoused by our Democratic representatives when it is likely that the origin of this blog came from anti-war resistance is beyond me), so rather than talking to Dodd about DIMEs, an appropriate question for our Senior Senator might have been about his inability to pass meaningful interest rate reform during the past decade. It wasn't. He cakewalked through an hour. That is the problem.  

Dodd postures that he wants to reform the system, then he genuflects before the political pressure from his party, or from the almighty campaign finance dollars coming from banks.

We mustn't let him get away with that. Sure, now he says he is leaving the door open to prosecute Cheney. But when the chips are one the table, like the FISA filibuster, he will fold.


[ Parent ]
Hey Ken (0.00 / 0)
You were a reporter for a alternative newspaper and were paid less than a dishwasher.

If you'd Stop posturing for one second and deal in reality perhaps people would laugh with you instead of at you.


[ Parent ]
Awww... (0.00 / 0)
Paragraph 3 and below didn't seem like posturing to me.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
Re: (4.00 / 5)
I sometimes wonder if MLN would be more valuable were it to be able to raise funds to pay someone to do original reporting.  There remains a difference between professional and amateur, hence the distinction, and this Dodd interview just proves it to me.

Well, no one's stopping you - or anyone else - from doing this, are they?

Unless you'd rather continue to spend your valuable "professional" time complaining, as you've done voluminously on this thread, about what people who aren't you aren't doing.


[ Parent ]
Mor on this later (0.00 / 0)
The computer ate my response post, and now I am due elsewhere.

Lake Zoarian: CT Bob paid for his own Guinness and the rest of us had water. Also, everyone knew what it was, what who wanted, and why we were there.

Ken: Basic preamble from the Senator was that newspapers are dead trees and blogs are the new media. Of course you need to be there. ctnewsjunkie and newhavenindependent are the "reporters" others are writers, bloggers, journalists, etc. We need decent (literally) non-lefties at these things too.

I considered this the first of several...ongoing...

I will post more after I come back from dressing as Little Edie at the Grey Gardens documentary screening in Milford.

"I am not a Blogger...But I play one on the internet."


Chris Dodd Thanks CBS For Biased Coverage (0.50 / 2)
In the context of the ongoing discussion over this diary, I thought it would be relevant to add this link:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/k...

Dodd responded by thanking Rodriguez and her CBS colleagues for their slanted coverage on the issue: "I think pretty good. And you've laid the groundwork for it because people are irate over these issues...I think we have a wonderful opportunity, now, to make a difference here and get a handle on these issues that have been gouging consumers for far too long."

Also, he's actively under attack right now. Tomorrow there will be a protest against him outside his office in Hartford. Besides the below link, I found notice published in the weekly paper "Voices". and, no, I'm certainly NOT a freeper, it's just what came up when I searched Google using the term "done with Dodd".

http://www.freerepublic.com/fo...

'We're Done With Dodd' Rally Planned For May 16 Outside His Hartford Office

Sean Murphy of Woodbury, the head of Connecticut Resistance, announced today that the group will hold a 'We're Done With Dodd' rally on Saturday, May 16 at 12:05 sharp, outside Senator Chris Dodd's offices at 30 Lewis Street in Hartford. Connecticut Resistance is the coalition dedicated to uprooting entrenched politicians and restoring government by the people.

"Dodd must go, and the sooner the better," Murphy said. "It is not a matter of party affiliation-he is just a lousy senator. This rally is a chance for the people of Connecticut to show that they have had enough of him.

"The real villains in the current financial mess are the politicians who let it happen," said Murphy. "Chris Dodd has been in Congress since 1975. He was in charge of the banking committee when the crisis hit, but instead of doing his duty, he moved to Iowa to run for president."

Former State Senator Joe Markley of Southington, an anti-tax leader and rally organizer, will serve as Master of Ceremonies.

"You don't often get a second opinion on a politician," Markley said, "but we did on Dodd. He alone among the candidates truly made Iowa his home-got a house for his family and put his daughter in kindergarten there. He spent nearly $20 million on his campaign, and met thousands of Iowans one-on-one. Caucus night, Chris Dodd finished dead last, the only candidate to run behind No Preference.

"According to the Iowa Democratic Party website (www.iowacaucusresults.com), he took 0.02% of the vote: that's two voters in ten thousand. Seems Iowans sensed something wrong with Dodd, the sleazy stench of political hack, perhaps, that we've smelled so long we grew used to it."

"Now the people of Connecticut are on to Dodd," Murphy said. "Only four people from our state gave to his campaign in the three months, according to his own filing. Instead he gets his money from the very industries our country relies on him to oversee. The only people who will help Dodd are the ones he has power to control. We owe it to America to get rid of Dodd. "For me, this rally is the next step after the Tea Parties. We need to expose and defeat corrupt politicians who have sold us out. Our speakers will be private citizens, not politicians or candidates. We welcome everyone who wants to join us on May 16, regardless of political views or party registration. Retiring Chris Dodd is a cause we all can get behind. We hope to make a strong point while having a great time, exercising our power and our rights as citizens."

WHO: Connecticut Resistance

WHAT: We're Done With Dodd Rally

WHERE: 30 Lewis Street (Dodd's office), Hartford, Connecticut

WHEN: Saturday, May 16 at 12 noon



"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

All due respect... (4.00 / 1)
but are you that stupid? Do some research before posting this type of shit.

For example, here's a bit of background on the reporter your first referenced piece.

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center

If I need to explain the MRC to you...well, then I don't know what to say.

That added with you highlighting the "Connecticut Resistance" led by Lou DeLuca crony Sean Murphy realy speaks volumes (and also explains why I gave your latest B.S. rant a big fat 1 for UNPRODUCTIVE).


[ Parent ]
OK (0.00 / 0)
No, I didn't know what the Media Research Center is, and I just searched it out. Not my kind of folks, no. And I know a little about the DeLuca scandal that ruined him, but had no idea who Murphy is. It's just more examples that Mr. Dodd has image problems right now, can you deny that?

But here's the point I'm trying to make- I see a situation where there is an information outlet (this blog) that has the potential to bring people who care and are paying attention, insight into what's really going on, unbiased and uncontrolled by anyone with an agenda. Real freedom. But lately all these big-time politicians' Information Operations staffers are taking the initiative  to use (and I think that's the appropriate term) these pages for their own purposes. That's a pretty strong criticism, and my reaction would likely be the same as yours, if I were in your shoes. But it's one I feel I ought to make, because whether it's DeLauro, Dodd, or Himes, these stories read like free publicity. Maybe I'm mistaken, but My Left Nutmeg doesn't seem like it was set up for that purpose, and it's the main reason I came here in the first place, I thought I would find people open minded to the truth and impervious to propaganda and deception. And I'm also talking about my 9/11 work, although I found this place as a result of the Lamont days three years ago.

You control this site, and you'll make it what you want it to be. But when I titled the comment that was dissappeared "The MLN Editorial Review Board", I was trying to say something about this trend, and I mean no disrespect, if you were offended, I'm sorry.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Might as well quote Sean Hannity ... (4.00 / 1)
Lakezoar, here's a tip: When people are criticizing Dodd, look at what they're criticizing him for:

Start with MRC: They criticized CBS for promoting Dodd's credit card bill! The credit card bill is a GOOD thing. MRC also slammed CBS for exposing the coal industry's role in global warming! MRC is a joke.

Then there's Murphy, a tea-bagger fighting for "tax justice" -- which means tax cuts for the rich.

If you're going to quote sources, quote sane people.

We progressives have our own beef with Senator Dodd, and we're hoping that he'll be responsive to our concerns. It seems like he's trying to be, and he deserves a huge amount of credit for that. In the coming months, we'll know more about how sincere he is and how effective he wants to be.


[ Parent ]
Dodd's in big trouble (0.00 / 0)
You can demonize the people out front opposing him, but it doesn't change the fact that Dodd is in trouble, and it's largely his own fault.

The presidential campaign made visible a streak of arrogance, not simply in Dodd's belief he could compete, but also in his decision to move to Iowa, an indication he took Connecticut voters for granted.  His rejection there was so absolute (he spent nearly $20 million on the campaign and received 0.02% of the vote--literally one vote in 5000) that the reverberation reached us back here.

He's also been ethically careless.  Whether or not he's crossed the line in any particular case, the number of questionable situations has become so large that he will no longer get the benefit of the doubt.  He will have to come entirely clean on everything--the Countrywide loan, the Irish cottage, his wife's income--which is not his nature (he's more of the 'best defense a good offense' type) and may not do the trick in any case.

We even have the testimony of his fellow Democrats (at a time when no one realized the words might haunt him) that his presidential run distracted him from his duties as chairman of the Banking committee and prevented the committee from tackling its work.  He's in a deep hole, and I don't think he has personality (even if he has the opportunity) to climb out of it.


 
14 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- DanMalloy.com
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Jonathan Harris (SD5)
- John Hartwell (SD26)
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100) - Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Di Masters (HD111)
- Michelle Mount (HD112)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox