Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

When will the media report on Lieberman's 387,000 dollar problem?

by: ctblogger

Sun May 03, 2009 at 10:55:34 AM EDT


For the exception of one paper, that THANKFULLY followed the story from it's origins, in the aftermath of the FEC's decision on Lieberman's 387,000 slush fund, the press' silence on the darkest chapter in Lieberman's 2006 primary campaign speaks volumes about the state of hard-news journalism in Connecticut.

Today's article in The New Haven Register outlines the scandal that the rest of the media is ignoring:

The campaign of U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, I-Conn., has agreed to pay a $50,000 civil penalty for numerous violations in its disbursement of a large amount of petty cash in the senator's 2006 primary fight with Ned Lamont.

The recent agreement comes three years after a complaint was filed by Lamont's campaign committee.

[...]

The Federal Election Commission opened an investigation in late 2006 after the Lamont campaign charged the senator had not accounted for a "slush fund" of $387,000 in expenditures labeled only as "petty cash."

The expenditures, mainly for get-out-the-vote canvassers, were made in the two weeks leading up to the hard fought primary vote in August 2006 - a campaign that ultimately cost $40 million.

The FEC found that the committee took out large amounts of cash on 14 separate occasions and gave it to "campaign consultants and volunteers who put cash in envelopes that were disbursed by canvassers, frequently in amounts well in excess of $100."

Campaigns may make expenditures of not more than $100 to any person or for a single transaction out of the petty cash fund, but are required to keep a written journal documenting the payments. Any payment over $100 needs to be made by check.

Also, the names and addresses of persons paid an aggregate in excess of $200 in a year are also expected to be reported and receipts maintained.

The FEC said the campaign failed to properly disclose the recipients of disbursements over $200 and to keep full records; misreported payments to two consultants and misreported a $75,000 disbursement. It also disbursed cash to recipients in excess of $100 and failed to keep accurate records.


Lamont's former spokesman Liz Dupont-Diel connects the dots in the following quote...
...at the time they filed the challenge, said an explanation of the expenditures was in line as "massive quantities of Lieberman 'volunteers' were showing up to disrupt our events and engage in dirty tactics."

For those not keeping score, in order to show the seriousness of this scandal, we'll need to go back in time...

ctblogger :: When will the media report on Lieberman's 387,000 dollar problem?
During the time in which Lieberman was dishing out money on the streets, paid-off goons so-called volunteers started disrupting various Lamont events...and at times getting physical.

Picture 23

For instance, remember the horrifying incident at Ted's where Lieberman's paid mercenaries went wild...

Ned walks into Ted's Steamed Cheeseburgers for the event, and the 3 or 4 booths inside are already packed, as are some of the counter seats, with about 15-20 teenagers and one older gentleman, many of whom had asked for and received Ned Lamont stickers from the Lamont staffers organizing the event. Ned says hi to the owner. As Ned starts talking, the teenagers reveal Lieberman T-shirts. The older gentleman starts yelling "Are You an Al Sharpton Democrat or a Bill Clinton Democrat?" and something along the lines of "because Bill Clinton has the support of everyone and Al Sharpton only has the support of..." trailing off. Ned decides to leave, with his staff fearing for his physical safety.

The entire scene moves outside, where about 6 reporters are there, witnessing the entire spectacle. A near melee ensues as at least 5 of the Lieberman kids continue to yell and scream at Ned and get physically abusive with Lamont staffers, even bloodying a photographer's nose.

A Lamont supporter at the scene noted the Lieberman staffers looked "red in the face" with anger.

Ned attempts to talk with a 90-year-old WWII veteran pilot from Virginia who wanted to discuss his opposition to the Iraq war. The Lieberman kids scream accusations about Ned's patriotism, spewing right-wing bile accusing him of not caring about our troops, and questioning whether he would (not verbatim) "let our citizens die again," assumedly a reference to 9/11.

One reporter goes up and tries to ask some of these kids whether they are volunteers or paid staffers for the Lieberman campaign. The kid screams in response, "Let me see your credentials!" The reporter produces said credentials. The kid replies "those are fake." None of the 15-20 Lieberman kids there would admit to being paid staffers. Nor would they tell the reporters their names, or any other personal information.

Ned eventually escapes. In the meantime, the teenage Lieberman staffers continue to yell and scream at the Lamont supporters who had shown up just to have a cheeseburger with Ned. Ned returns about 10 minutes later, when things have calmed down.

The reporters were, to a person, understandably horrified at the spectacle.

...or what about our introduction to hitman Liebergoon Richard Goodstein's leading role in the drama (a.k.a the "big bald guy").

The next stop is just a few miles away at Ted's, a famous cheeseburger shack in town. Ned greets some supporters on the patio outside, and then we file inside to get our steamed burgers. It's small and crowded in here, and though the drill is to stay as far out of the candidate's way as possible, I get pinned right up against Ned in the crowd. Then, all of a sudden, everyone in the restaurant, in the booths and at the counter, everywhere, simultaneously pulls on a white Lieberman T-shirt. It takes a second to process what's happening. "Oh, my God," Ned says. "It's the Lieber people." They start heckling Ned aggressively, using campaign attack lines about taxes and how for sixteen years, until right before this campaign, Ned belonged to a country club in Greenwich that has almost no black members. Most of Joe's supporters in Ted's are kids, but there's one big bald guy, the only adult among them, who starts a loud, frenzied inquisition right in Ned's face. "Are you a Bill Clinton Democrat or an Al Sharpton Democrat?"

"They're not mutually exclusive," Ned says.

"No, I'm asking. Answer me! Clinton or Sharpton?" Ned tries to answer, but the guy interrupts: "I worked for Abe Ribicoff. He couldn't play golf at your country club in Greenwich!" When Ned starts to turn away, the guy says, "Don't turn your back on me, Ned!

"Let's keep this civil for the last five days of the campaign," Ned says, and he starts making his way among the Lieber kids, shaking their hands again.

The big bald guy is right in my face now. I ask him where he's from, what his role is here, and he shouts and wags his finger and demands my credentials, yelling to the crowd that I'm not a legitimate reporter and I must be with Ned. Suddenly, I realize the goal here is to provoke Ned into overreacting on-camera. And if not him, then someone on his staff. And it's working; I want badly to take a swing at this lunatic, and I'm not even on the campaign. I flash back to yesterday and the Banana Man and the thug yelling at Tom Swan, "Hit me! Do it!"

Oh, it's gets better. Here's video of Goodstein and Lieberman's hired help in Greenwich days after the incident at Teds:

With Goodstein having a long well-documented connection with dirty tricks, the DC lobbyist (who's now a MSNBC democratic talking head) was the perfect person to lead the Lieberthugs for team Joementum in the days leading up to the primary.
Notwithstanding the episode at Ted's as well as the nonsense from Goodstein and Lieberman's goonsquad in Greenwich, there was clear evidence that Lieberman was throwing a massive amount of money of the street....which was clearly evident with the sudden large amount of "volunteers" who walked the streets of New Haven, Bridgeport, and other large cities in the days before the primary.

...and we're just talking about how Lieberman used a PORTION of the 387,000 in COLD HARD CASH.

Till this day, we still have no accountability when it comes to how Lieberman used all of his slush fund...387,000 used up in just 12 DAYS. That breaks down to 32,000 per day WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY and almost three years later we still have no answers...and the so-called media in our state is still silent.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Lieberman is a crook (0.00 / 0)
... too bad the FEC didn't explain it that way. The $50,000 fine is a joke too. The FEC says it didn't FIND any wrongdoing by Lieberman ...

The FEC report, which is in the form of a conciliation agreement with the Friends of Joe Lieberman, said it "has no information and has made no finding that Sen. Lieberman engaged in any wrongdoing in connection with the alleged campaign violations."

The reason they didn't FIND any wrongdoing is because Lieberman didn't keep records of the disbursements!

The payments were not itemized, nor did the committee maintain the required documentation.

Lieberman supposedly paid at least 400 people an average of more than $500 each in cash -- no checks. First of all, any amount over $100 is supposed to be by check. Secondly, how does the FEC know Lieberman didn't pay fewer people a lot more money? Maybe the money went to pay rent for members of Joe's family! Who knows what it was used for -- the FEC clearly doesn't.  

The lesson for campaign managers is this: you can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to hire goons, pay in cash, keep lousy records, but just make sure set aside $50K for FEC fines. (NONE of which comes out of Lieberman's pocket -- it's all other people's money.) My prediction is you'll see a lot more of this.

 


How happy would contributors be (0.00 / 0)
to learn that their donations may have been used in an illegal way -- or that their contribution may have gone to pay an FEC fine?

Something Joe should consider if he runs for office again...


[ Parent ]
And what website broke the Goodstein story? (0.00 / 0)
and it hit Talking Points Memo and Huffington Post before I even took my morning shower.


Boy, that video makes me pine for the "good ol' days" (4.00 / 1)
I had such a great time that day.  Dickie was such an insufferable ass, it really felt good to hammer him like the lobbyist slug he was! Good times...

Connecticut Bob

Greenwich Time Twists the Truth- Again (4.00 / 2)
Buried in Monday's edition on page six there is an 80-word article- yep, you got it right: 80-word article- about Lieberman's paying a $50,000 fine.  Of course, on the "national page" there is a much longer article with a big headline and a photo of John Edwards about an investigation of Edwards' campaign spending.  How typical of the right-wing shills at Greenwich Time/Stamford Advocate!

So they play up real big a story about John Edwards.  But a major story about Joe Lieberman's being caught paying out untraceable cash to thugs to harrass Ned Lamont gets buried in one of the very smallest articles it is possible to publish.

This is so reminiscent of the way the played it with Chris Shays' assault on the D.C. police officer.  It was an entire week later that Greenwich Time and Stamford Advocate finally published an article about Shays' verbal abuse of the cop, and it came only after several days of complaints from Democrats to the newspaper.

And they think they run a reputable publication!  Pulleeze!


These are the rules that... (0.00 / 0)
Holy Joe and his ilk have used for years. They will not change because as you see, they are rewarded for following these rules.

What about Lynn Fusco? (4.00 / 3)
Lynn Fusco was the treasurer of the campaign.  Why isn't someone asking whether she she should be in charge of CPTV.  She was recently elected Chair of the Board of Trustees of Connecticut Public Broadcasting, Inc.

If she cannot keep track of $357,000 in small bills how can she possibly keep track of our small contributions to public radio and television?

I am baffled by the lack of reporting on this issue nationally and locally.


CT Public Radio/TV has gone steadily downhill ... (0.00 / 0)
... and this helps explain why. I stopped donating money to them when I got fed up with their horrible coverage of the Lamont-Lieberman campaign in 2006. I won't ever donate another dime to them unless a new regime takes control and they start doing some real news coverage. Connecticut sorely needs it.      

[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox