Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

Resources
2007 Legislative "Heroes and Zeroes"
2007 "Worst Republicans In The State"
2007 "Worst Democrats In The State"
CT Congressional Delegation and the Progressive Agenda
CT Clean Elections Funding Explained
Federal Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
State Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
 
 
My Left Nutmeg

Look but don't touch

by: ctblogger

Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:20:42 AM EST


The Chris Dodd drama continues...
In an attempt to end the controversy over favorable treatment extended him by a major mortgage company, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd is opening his mortgage records for inspection today.

He will hold a press conference in Hartford, then provide access to the documents. No copying will be permitted.


The longer this drags out, the more this will hurt the senator...

UPDATE: Senator Dodd released the following statement:

Good morning.  Today, we'll be making public all of the documents that we possess related to the refinancings of our 2003 mortgage loans.  I regret I did not do this sooner and I apologize to the people of Connecticut for the delay.  

I planned on making these documents public after the Ethics Committee completed its work, but I should have realized that with national elections and the start of a new Congress it was unrealistic to expect the Committee to finish by now.


Read the rest of Senator Dodd's statement below the fold...

UPDATE 2: Senator Dodd's office has released a summary of the documents which you can also read below the fold.

UPDATE 3: With the release of his documents, Senator Dodd did a media blitz today. Here's his interviews on WTNH and WVIT.

ctblogger :: Look but don't touch
Let me start by making two important points.  

First, Jackie and I acted properly in our mortgage refinancing negotiations.  We did not seek or expect any special rates or terms on our loans and we never received any.  

Second, the rates and terms we did negotiate were widely available in the market when we refinanced.

In the spring of 2003, when mortgage rates were dropping to a near 50 year low, and we did what millions of other Americans did - we refinanced the mortgages on our home in Connecticut, which I've owned for 27 years, and our home in Washington, which we bought together in 1999.  There was an almost unprecedented level of mortgage refinancing in the spring of 2003 and lenders were aggressively competing to attract new customers or retain current borrowers.

We shopped around with several different lenders during that time, but decided to stay with Countrywide because they met the lower rates and terms that were readily available from other lenders.  We had been a good customer, and it was easier to refinance with them than to originate new mortgages with a new lender.  

We negotiated only with loan officers.  There was nothing special about the rates, fees, or points.  We were never offered special or sweetheart deals and if anyone had made such an offer- we would have severed that relationship immediately.

Today, we are making public over 100 pages of documents that include the details on our 2003 loans: the Connecticut refinance, the Washington, DC refinance and the home equity loan.  These documents contain all the information about the rates, fees, points and terms of our loans.  The documents also include the information about the float down of the rates that we negotiated for both the CT and Washington homes.  These are all the documents that Jackie and I used and relied upon when we negotiated the refinancings of our mortgage loans including the home equity loan.

We are also releasing a number of documents that our lawyers received from Countrywide last summer.  We had never seen these documents before.  

These two sets of documents are all of the documents concerning these loans that we have in our possession.  They have all been provided to the Ethics Committee.

Lastly, I'm providing an independent report from a firm that reviewed our loan documents, examined and analyzed loan rates across the mortgage industry and the real estate market at that time.  The report clearly concludes that the rates and terms of our loans were available to similarly qualified borrowers at the time.  

These documents put to rest any notion that Jackie and I received a special deal or sweetheart deal on our loans.

Allow me to address two other issues: the so called "friends of Angelo" list and the VIP program at Countrywide.  

Let me be very clear, we are not friends of Angelo Mozilo and we have never been a friend of his.  We have never communicated with him or anyone else other than loan officers at Countrywide about our mortgages.  The first we ever heard of the "friends of Angelo" list was through press reports last summer.  Apparently, Countrywide put us on this list, but it was without our knowledge or consent and as you'll see we negotiated market rates and terms.

We were aware of the VIP program.  We asked what it entailed and we were told that it was nothing more than enhanced customer service.  For instance, being able to get a person on the phone instead of an automated operator.  

We believed this was nothing more than a courtesy for highly qualified borrowers.  We have since been told the VIP program includes thousands of customers.  

Since we shopped around for competing rates at the time of our refinancing and since Countrywide was offering competitive rates and terms, we had no reason to believe that we were getting anything that wasn't widely available to similarly qualified borrowers.  

Let me conclude by saying - knowing what I know now, I regret having ever done business with Countrywide.  As I said earlier, I also regret not making these documents public sooner.  I respect the Ethics Committee process, but I also have an obligation to the people of Connecticut, who have a right to expect the highest standards from their elected representatives.  And again, I am sorry that I did not do this sooner.

Lastly, Jackie and I have also decided that we will refinance our homes and, in an abundance of caution, we will be seeking a third party to negotiate the new loan terms on our behalf.

I am proud of my service as a United States Senator for these past 28 years.  I understand there will always be people who disagree with my positions on certain issues, but I do not want anyone to ever believe that I would trade my office for personal financial gain.  To believe that is to misunderstand everything that is important to me and everything that has motivated my work serving the people of Connecticut.



Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Doesn't make me feel any better... (0.00 / 0)
But what do I know about Countrywide's fine customer service, eh? /snark


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


What Dodd doesn't understand ... (4.00 / 2)
It's not just the Countrywide loans that's a problem. It's also the actions Dodd has taken in favor of banks, mortgage lenders, insurance companies and other financial institutions over the years.

As it stands, Dodd's legacy will be the Congressman who ushered in the collapse of the American banking industry with disastrous legislation like the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Two members of Congress championed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and took credit for its enactment over President Clinton's veto:

Republican Christopher Cox, then a Congressman from Silicon Valley, California. Cox collected campaign contributions from high tech executives who also happened to be fraud defendants.

Democratic Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, who became very popular among banks and securities companies who were fraud defendants and among insurance companies who pay the investor settlements in financial fraud cases.

Dodd enjoyed the eager support of many top Democrats in favor of restricting investors' access to the courts.

Not everyone thought this was a keen idea, however. Consumer groups, states attorneys general who enforce the securities laws, the AARP, and the securities regulators in all 50 states sent messages to Cox and Dodd that the bill was a bad idea that would weaken safeguards against fraud. ("Less protection for investors." Consumer Reports Sept. 1995.)

Rick Roberts, a former Securities and Exchange Commissioner under the first President Bush, warned in September 1995, "if you look at the whole picture, congress is taking away the right to bring an action if there is a fraud; it's cutting the level of information investors receive; and third it will try to slash the SEC budget so there are no public remedies. If I was an investor, I would be getting very queasy about plugging my money into the securities market."

Rick Roberts and many others predicted more than a decade ago that we were heading toward a banking disaster. Dodd ignored them. The banking meltdown now has Chris Dodd's name all over it.

Dodd is Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and he has the power to push for meaningful banking reform in Congress. Even Dodd himself, as well as other banking committee members like Chuck Schumer, agree that we need reform. The question is, why hasn't Dodd done anything about it?

Is is so that he'd keep his VIP status at Countrywide? Or so that his wife could serve on the boards of financial service companies, bringing in a million dollars in compensation? Or so that these companies would set up HQs in CT? We need to understand all this, and then we need him to be a leader on meaningful banking reform.  


7/2003 ARM resets in 5 years..that would be 7/2008? (4.00 / 1)
Jackie and Chris have "decided to refinance (their) homes", which seems unremarkable, given that they had an ARM that guaranteed their rates for 5 years and the rates re-set last July or so, I gather.  Who wouldn't at least try to refinance?

Is a 5 year period before a re-set typical?  I thought it was really usually 2.5 years or so.  Is the period at the low rate truly unremarkable considering the "competitive" market which Dodd remembers from 2003?

How much would Dodd have saved over the average person who could only get reduced rates for 2.5 years?

Just kind of wondering.


Ours was 2 years... (0.00 / 0)
But Countrywide didn't think we were VIPs, I guess?


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
5/1 ARMs are extremely common (4.00 / 1)
You usually only see 2 year ARMs for borrowers with poor credit.  (These loans are often called "2/28s" since the rate is fixed for 2 years and then variable for the remaining 28 years).  The Dodds had great credit scores, so it would have been unusual for them to take a loan with only a 2 year fixed rate period.

It does sound like one of the loans has probably reset, although one is still fixed for another 4.5 years.  Therefore, it is actually a big deal that they are going to refinance.

-DP


[ Parent ]
Thanks for explaining how it works (0.00 / 0)
I guess most of the news reports focused on the loans where people had less than awesome credit ratings.  I didn't know about the five-year and longer re-sets.  (I rent.)

[ Parent ]
I was a couple of years out of the Army (0.00 / 0)
at the time and still trying to fix my credit from then. lol

Thanks for explaining.


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
Dodd's strategery (4.00 / 1)
Getting the bad news out there now so that in 2010 he can say its all been done and re-done to death.  We'll see if this "strategery" works.

Doesn't Matter (0.00 / 0)
When he runs for reelection he'll win and win big.Nobody on the Democratic side will challenge him and the Ct Republican Party is such a joke I wouldn't be suprised if Schlesinger was their candidate.

This little poll isn't scientific but Dodd,even with all his warts,isn't Joe Lieberman and will cost to victory and help the entire Democratic ticket Statewide if he chooses to run in 2010.

http://www.courant.com/news/po...


[ Parent ]
He'll win... (0.00 / 0)

if he can continue to take progressives for granted. I don't know about anybody else, but I am getting plenty sick and tired of voting for someone just because they aren't a Republican and are perceived to be "the lesser of two evils".

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a

[ Parent ]
Dodd vs Schiff... (0.00 / 0)

Ladies and Gentlemen... in this corner, the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, who when he wasn't supporting legislation enabling the financial meltdown of 2008, he was asleep at the switch...vs... in this corner Connecticut Republican and economist,Peter Schiff, who early on issued the clarion call, warning us about the meltdown...

Gee, I wonder who Independents will flock to!?

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a


[ Parent ]
Jake (0.00 / 0)
Peter Schiff is not even registered to vote in this state.Furthermore his Daddy is in Jail for Tax evasion.

Dodds been damaged a little by his peoples mishandling of the mortgage questions but will sail to victory.


[ Parent ]
Keith... (0.00 / 0)

I heard Schiff mentioned as a possible candidate. I was just pointing out what I perceive as Dodds' vulnerability.

The registration issue that you point to, can be fixed easily and as far as the matter of the financial improprieties of Schiffs' Daddy...well, let's just say that he and Dodd could call it a wash.    

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a


[ Parent ]
Healy is an idiot (0.00 / 0)
If I were Chris Healy, chairman of the Republican Party, I would be telling every reporter in CT about Dodd's role in passing the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, and his vote in favor of Gramm-Leach-Bliley etc.

The problem is, Republicans are so stupid that they actually support those actions. Their stocks are dropping by 50%, the city of Fairfield lost millions in the Madoff scandal, and these moron Republicans keep harping that government regulations are a bad thing.

If McKinney ran against Dodd, though, I think McKinney would be savvy enough to use these arguments against Dodd, and attack him from the left and as a reformer. If he did that, McKinney might actually win.

Also, I don't think Dodd being on the ticket actually helps Democrats, because any Republican running as a reformer can point to Dodd as the poster child for bad government and use Dodd's incompetence to criticize any Democrat who Dodd endorses or any Democrat who supports Dodd.

Then again, Dodd can neutralize pretty much all of this criticism by passing meaningful banking reform in Congress. I hope he does.

But if he doesn't, I hope someone runs against him and beats him. Or better yet, maybe he just resigns and lets a better Democrat run for that seat.

But we really need banking reform, and Dodd should be the one pushing it in Congress. We'll see if he does.  


[ Parent ]
Senators are not royalty... (0.00 / 0)
 but you would sometimes think so, the way they are fawned over by party machinery. I used to be strongly opposed to term limits on philosophical grounds; but our two Senators have become poster boys for them. It's time for the rank and file to let Party leadership know that we feel it is time for a change.

But let justice roll down like waters...Amos 5:24a

I wonder... (0.00 / 0)
If there is a way to lay out term limits on Federal level politicians at the state level? Is that Constitutionally legal? Is there precedence for or against?


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
A Republican, or a primary challanger, might have a chance (0.00 / 0)
... if Dodd doesn't reform the banking industry.

The city of Fairfield was devastated by the Madoff scandal. When people realize that it was Dodd's legislation that made Madoff possible -- by making it easier to defraud investors -- I think voters will be pissed off enough to consider someone else.

Dodd's approval ratings are their lowest ever. So people are kind of getting wise to his fake outrage over the banking scandal. He's appalled! Appalled!!! .... at all malfeasance.

Then he does nothing about it. He blames the Treasury Dept., the SEC, the President. But he's the chairman of the banking committee. He has the power to fix a lot of these problems, especially now that there's a Democratic president, 59 Democratic Senators, and widespread public support for it. Even the industry agrees it needs reform.

There are no excuses anymore. If he doesn't reform banking now, -- and really reform it, not just create some loophole-ridden b.s. law -- it would actually be better to have anyone else in that Senate seat, even a Republican.  


I am thinking his position on Health Denial (0.00 / 0)
is more likely to hurt him. The people know and recognize corporate welfare when they see it. But that is just my opinion.


Drinking Liberally in New Milford
ePluribus Media


[ Parent ]
Town Of Fairfield NOT Devastated (0.00 / 0)
We lost our $17 million investment that had a "face value" of $42 million. Everyone is calling it a $42 million loss, but come on. It's bad, but not devastating.  

[ Parent ]
individual investor group lost big too (0.00 / 0)
There was a group of orthopedic doctors and their staff members from Fairfield who had a 401k plan with Madoff worth $11 million, which was almost completely wiped out.

Call it whatever you want, but I don't think people are too happy about it.


[ Parent ]
Dodd has a Mortgage? (0.00 / 0)
Wow.

I thought they gave the K Street houses away for next to nothing.

(Ya lern somthin evree dai.)


Just like the rest of us (4.00 / 1)
I am glad that Chris Dodd finally released all of the documents.  After all the suspense, it was incredibly anti-climactic.  He got two run-of-the mill mortgages with the same rates advertised in the newspaper.  He paid the same fees anyone applying for a loan at that time would have paid (actually, he paid a bit more).  If this is a sweetheart deal, I think I will pass.

If there was any surprise yesterday, it was just how normal the Dodd family's personal finances look.  If you read between the lines of the independent third-party report, you get a picture of a family that looks a lot more like you and me than some rich millionaire.  Both of Chris Dodd's houses are mortgaged.  The Dodds justified the loans based on his Senate salary alone.  They watch their credit and pay their bills on time.  When rates dropped in 2003, they refinanced to save a few dollars per month.  Speaking from personal experience, every dollar helps these days.

I know that someone is going to jump all over me for saying that someone with two houses and a six-figure salary is just like the rest of us.  Clearly, they are doing alright financially.  But my point is, I cannot find anything--other than wild partisan speculation--that says Chris Dodd did not play by the same rules as the rest of us.

When it comes to the Senate Banking Committee and legislation to help ordinary Americans like me, it actually makes me feel better to know that the Chairman has to sit down and pay his run-of-the-mill mortgage each month just like me.

-DP


 
8 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Ned Lamont
- Dan Malloy
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100)
- Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox