Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

My Left Nutmeg

More on the CT GOP's efforts against Voter Registration

by: Aldon Hynes

Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 10:42:42 AM EDT


(The GOP smear job against ACRON hits Connecticut... - promoted by ctblogger)

Since I wrote my previous blog post, The RNC Brings Voter Suppression to Connecticut there have been a few interesting developments.

More and more people are sending me information about this and about the RNC efforts across the nation to suppress voter registration and voter turnout.  This included a PDF of a letter from Lucy Corelli, the Republican Registrar of Voters to Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal about a complaint she filed with the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC).  In her letter she writes


I am filing this complaint because I believe in the fair and democratic process.  I feel fraudulent behavior should be discouraged and eliminated.  Everyone who is eligible has the right to register and vote but this abuse of our system makes a mockery of one of our most precious rights.
Aldon Hynes :: More on the CT GOP's efforts against Voter Registration
In her complaint she solemnly swears or affirms to the best of her knowledge and belief that


On or about August 1, 2008 we received from the Secretary of the State's office approximately 1200 voter registration cards from ACORN.  Over 600 of these were rejected because of duplicates, underage, illegible, and invalid addresses.

As part of the complaint, Ms. Corelli submitted about twenty questionable voter registration cards.  Some of them were illegible or incomplete, and were probably properly rejected.  However, writing illegibly or failing to fill in a form completely is not normally considered a criminal offense.

Other cards had conflicting information.  For example there were five voter registration cards for Tyree Winfrey which were rejected because he had a different signature on each card.  I called the number on the registration card and a woman answered the phone.  She said that Tyree couldn't come to the phone and asked what the call was about.  When I explained, she said that Tyree has muscular dystrophy and it is not surprising that his signature is considerably different on each card.

Two cards were submitted for Jerry Berrouet, one from June 13th and another from July 15th.  I called the number listed on the phone on the June form, and it was not in service.  A woman answered the phone number Mr. Berrouet had provided in July.  She said that she had not seen him in about two months and no longer associates with him.  It is not clear why Mr. Berrouet has moved, yet like the case of Mr. Winfrey, it appears that there is most likely a better explanation for the differing cards than fraud.

Even if some of the cards are found to be fraudulent, there is no evidence presented that the people collecting the cards on behalf of ACORN took part in the fraudulent activity.

ACORN explains that they collect voter registration cards and review them for possible problems.  The cards that are problematic are submitted separately with a note about the possible problems.  They do this because it would be inappropriate, if not illegal, for them to hold onto voter registration cards that they find questionable.  It is the responsibility of the Registrar of Voters to determine voter eligibility.

What is more concerning are the six hundred cards that were rejected.  Were they rejected because they were incomplete or illegible?  Did the Registrar make a best effort to determine the validity of the cards?  Are there six hundred people that think they are registered to vote that are not because of some problem at the Registrar of Voters office?

I will be submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the Stamford Registrar of Voters Office to obtain copies of the six hundred rejected voter registration cards to try and find out more information.

If this were the end of the story, it would be bad enough.  However, there's more.

I also received a copy of a letter sent to Fourth Congressional Candidate, Jim Himes from Christopher Healy, chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party.  It starts off


I am writing you to ask for your help in support in calling for an end to the voter registration campaign initiated in the Fourth Congressional District by ACORN - Action for Community Organizations for Reform.

This week, two complaints have been filed by Republican Registrars in Bridgeport and Stamford concerning the efforts of ACORN representatives.

This is problematic in many different aspects.  Perhaps most troubling is that it shows a disregard for due process and the American belief that people, and organizations are innocent until proven guilty.  Yes, two complaints have been filed.  As noted above, there is good reason to question these complaints, and I believe that the SEEC will do an appropriate job in investigating the complaint and taking proper action.

The other concern is that instead of trying to make sure that "Everyone who is eligible has the right to register and vote", Mr. Healy is calling for an end of a very successful and at least by every indication I've seen, properly run, voter registration effort.

We do need to make sure that there is no abuse of our electoral system, and this includes making sure that allegations are properly investigated and rash actions which would suppress voter registration are not taken.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
FOI Request (0.00 / 0)
I will be submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the Stamford Registrar of Voters Office to obtain copies of the six hundred rejected voter registration cards to try and find out more information.

That's a three-hundred-dollar document request, dude! I understand that ACORN keeps scanned copies of their registration cards, and they might be willing to provide them to you for free.

I'd ask Stamford for a list of both active and inactive voters from earlier in the year (pref. before ACORN did their drive). Some cards may be duplicates or updates for people who hadn't voted in years, and so their "duplicate" registration would have moved them to the active voters list.

Anecdotally, having spent some hours helping in my local registrar's office this season, probably 15-20% of the cards that come through the mail or via walk-ins are from people who were already registered -- and those are people who took the initiative themselves. A 50% dupe rate seems at the high end of the range of what's reasonable for a massive drive in low-income areas.

Stamford also, it bears mentioning, maintains a dual-entry system for their voter data (if you ask for a disk file, you don't get the standard SOTS system file), so I'd be curious to see if they're rejecting cards as "duplicates" by the standards of their own system, while such cards may qualify as "changes" under the SOTS system. (Even if the new card has the driver's license # where the original used the last 4 digits of the SS#, it accepts the added information as an update.)

–7.25 / –7.28 | http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tw...


ACORN Statements as covered by Uncounted (4.00 / 1)

From ACORN President Maude Hurd, "If John McCain thinks that community organizers caused the foreclosure crisis, he knows even less about the economy than previously thought"

Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field, but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.

Fact: ACORN flags incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in, but these warnings are often ignored by election officials. Often these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards.

Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card, so there is NO incentive for them to falsify cards. ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations

There is more, read it all here:  http://uncountedthemovie.com/b...

because Connecticut voters count: http://www.CTVotersCount.org


GOP's efforts against Voter Registration (0.00 / 0)
I think it behooves the media to check out what the current control totals are for registered voters to see if between now and the election there are large decreases. Anything over 2% or 3% should be a red flag.

Aldon is so right about ACORN. Their quality control seems incredibly good, let me repeat (with apologies to Joe Biden), incredibly good. ACORN informs the registrars of suspect cards when a batch is submitted to the registrars. By law, ACORN is required to pass on each and every card filled out. It is the extra effort of pre-screening the cards by ACORN that should be lauded. That's the real story: Vigilence, thoroughness, and integrity. What more could you want from an organization? Just that the same standard be applied to the possibly frivolous legal action by a Republican registrar of voters. We should be asking our Republican and Democratic registrars to acknowledge ACORN's efforts.


[ Parent ]
 
0 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links


Connecticut's War Dead

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- A Public Defender
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Chris Murphy for Senate
- Susan Bysiewicz for Senate

- William Tong for Senate


Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin



More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Powered by: SoapBlox